/lit/ - Literature

>>18623463
Try your luck here
>>>/pol/
>>>/r/eddit

Dostoevsky

>>18623468
but reddit is commie central?

Communists have ruined this world

>>18623463
Jordan Peterson.
Ben Shapiro.
Joe Rogan.

>>18623474
reddit is liberal millennial central

>>18623463
>>18623478
>>18623481
Stefan Molyneux.

You hate them because you know deep down they are right. You likely are well off and know a revolution would not bode well for you or your family, resulting in forced labor or extermination. The hate actually has nothing to do with the ideology or its aims, but your security in life and the realization that all that secures your lot in life - property rights, laws, money - are made up spooks divorced from the natural world as much as the delusional modern leftist is.

Essentially your seething amounts too
>NOOOOOOOOOO HECKIN GRUG CANT TAKE MUH SHIT, BECAUSE UHHHH ITS MINE THATS WHY

>>18623493
the "natural world" is a spook as well. funny how you stirnercels call everything a spook except your own beliefs and ideologies, but not surprising from a reader

>>18623493
I want to be penetrated by big commie cock!

>>18623497
me too anon me too

Stop wasting your time with hateful literature, listen to Bach.

>>18623493
Communism is mental illness

It is also madness to even reason with them. All fascist organizations understand that only extreme violence is proper reaction to the Red Menace

>>18623493
Damn I’m not even a right wing guy you sound like a huge faggot whose face I’d spit in. If you’re trying to recruit people to your side you’re doing a fucking awful job mate.

>>18623519
heckin based!!!

>>18623463
Most anti-communist writer? Probably Ayn Rand. Very anti-communist but still a good writer? Dostoevsky.

>>18623488
being anti capitalist is the hot meme there though, tonnes of massive subs that reach the front page are leftist

>>18623544
exactly, they're just liberals LARPing as "communists", but that's just your regular anti capitalist sentiment, which is quite quotidian
communists don't exist anymore and they never will, these people are just playing a game.

You’re a fucking faggot if you’re a communist. I was part of the DSA for like 2 years before I realized how insanely gay and cringe that shit was. I’m serious, I didn’t meet a single cool person and besides me I can’t imagine the guys who weren’t trans at those meetings we’re getting pussy. I feel like insane amounts of shame and embarrassment that I went to those meetings lmfao.

>>18623463
back to /pol/ idiot

>>18623560
Make him faggot

First, we are not against all kinds of revolutions. We are against all kinds of plans and actions, regardless of their means being violent or non-violent, that are intended to link up communism with administrative power. Needless to say, such plots attempt to push for the establishment of the so-called “democratic coalition government” (pro-communist regime). We are opposed to all forms of linking up communism with administrative power, regardless of names or substances, refusing to be hoodwinked by their masks of either internationalism or nationalism, and avoiding being confused by their deceptive methods of either direct democracy or popular front.
The Communist Manifesto remarks as follows: “Communists openly declare that we seek to achieve our aims through, and only through, forcefully subverting all the existing social orders.”
What we are striving to protect are our Japanese culture, history, and traditions. According to the interpretations of their dialectical materialism, all these are certainly included in their “all the existing social orders to be subverted.”

Second, we are the last defenders and the ultimate representatives of the Japanese culture, history, and traditions that must be protected, and we consider ourselves the elite and spearhead of such a mission. We are diametrically opposed to all kinds of thinking that advocate for or imply a “better future society,” because future-oriented actions deny the matureness of culture, negate the nobility of traditions, and seek to transform the irreplaceable “now” completely into a process toward revolution. Embodying the historical continuum, manifesting the essence of history, demonstrating traditional aesthetic form, and making oneself the last sentinel; such a behavioral principle was the very principle that governed the conduct of the Kamikaze Tokkotai who left a testament citing: “Behind us, there will be an endless column of successors.” Such an idea of believing “an endless column of successors” is exactly one that is theoretically antithetical to the idea of “a better future society.” This is because every “successor” was an actor convinced that he was a member of the last sentinels taking the last stand, practicability not being a concern.

>>18623567
Third, we discerned that post-War revolutionary thinking has always revolved around the collective rationale of the weak. No matter how violently it shows itself, it reflects the mentality of the weak, which is inseparable from the collectivist rationale of certain groups or organizations. It sows the seeds of unrest, suspicion, antipathy, hatred, and jealousy, and uses them as materials for intimidation. It is a group movement that puts together the vilest and most ignoble sentiments of the weak and uses them for certain political purposes. Holding the banner of a vacuous, naïve, and deceptively pleasing ideology, basing it on and connecting it with the lowest sentiments of the weak, by which to win over half of the votes and “democratically” rule over various kinds of small groups and organizations, and through it to oppress the minority and permeate all fields of the society, that is their way.
We take the stance of the strong and start as a minority. Qualities of the Japanese spirit such as brightness and cleanness, generosity, integrity, and high morality are our possessions. Again, practicability is not an issue, because it is not our intention to place our very existence and action in the process toward the future.

Fourth, why are we against communism?

Firstly, communism is absolutely incompatible with our national identity i.e., our national culture, history, and traditions, and is theoretically incompatible with the existence of the Monarch, which is a unique and irreplaceable symbol of our historical continuity, cultural uniformity, and ethnic homogeneity.

>>18623571
The Meiji state had sought for an eclectic combination of the polity of Western Europe and the national character of Japan, and adopted an imitated political system of constitutional monarchy. Post-War Japan pulled away from this combination and chose to introduce a relationship of the two that is neither too close, nor too distant, characterized by parliamentary democracy and a symbolic Emperor, which instead highlighted the fundamentally cultural and non-political nature of the historical monarchic tradition. What should be restored is not the grotesque eclecticism, let alone something like Republicanism that destroys cultural continuity.

To manifest the true and rightful nature of the Emperor, we approve of the freedom of speech that is regarded as a virtue of the parliamentary democracy of modern Japan. This is because the essential character of Japanese nationhood that is both new and old and that deserves to be discovered, emerges precisely at the connection point between the whole Japanese culture system — guaranteed to the largest extent by freedom of speech — and the Emperor system as a cultural concept.

>>18623574
On the other hand, the pro-communist and the weak merely utilize freedom of speech as a means, process, and tactic, and argue that progressive values that theoretically promote revolutions lie in freedom of speech itself. This is a misperception. Although freedom of speech is the demarcation line of mutual compromise between human nature and politics, it also satisfies the minimal instinctual requirements of humankind at the same time. (Please refer to my thesis The State of Freedom and Power.)

At present, we do not possess a realistically better political system than parliamentary democracy composed of multiple political parties, as one that guarantees freedom of speech.
This compromise-based and purely technical political system, its shortcomings of lacking idealism and real leadership notwithstanding, is most suited to the protection of freedom of speech, and it alone is capable of countering and resisting totalitarianism which necessarily incorporates speech censorship, secret police, and detention camps.

Secondly, we are opposed to communism for the sake of protecting freedom of speech.
We aim to smash the nationalist mask of the Communist Party of Japan; in other words, to shatter the illusion of its humanistic-socialism that claims to achieve the protection of freedom of speech, through the Japanese way, for the first time in the world, as this political experiment of theirs, even if it is implemented as literally described, will immediately and patently reveal its horrifying one-party dictatorial nature once it succeeds.

>>18623565
*makes him*

>>18623580
Fifth, resorting first and foremost to speech struggle, economic struggle, and political struggle are their customary tactics, and “discussion” is but a ploy embedded in their tactics. Our fight only needs to be one round, and it must be a fight in which we put life and death at stake. After fighting the round we gamble with life and death, it is up to history, spiritual values, and moral principles to make the judgment. Our anti-revolutionary movement is a shoreline operation against the enemies. The shoreline refers not to the geographic shoreline of Japan, but the spiritual bulwark of us as individual Japanese. With the courage and confidence to go against the prevailing trend, we shall not mind becoming hated and despised enemies of the revolutionary masses. Bracing against the abuse and revilement, ridicule, taunts, and provocations from the masses and remaining steadfast and undeterred, we are resolved to commit our own lives to reawaken their eroded Japanese spirit.

We are the embodiment of the traditional aesthetics and virtues of Japan.
January, the 44th Year of Shōwa.

>>18623463

Runaway Horses

>>18623567
>>18623571
>>18623574
>>18623580
>>18623588
literally KYSed himself because he couldn¿t cope with being a gaylord, SAD!

>>18623600
true anti-communist sentiment

>>18623600
seethe

https://counter-currents.com/2012/05/marxism-and-the-frankfurt-school/
>In all Marxist groups you get the rather weak, pacifistic, loving, humanistic people. The vicar’s daughter who believes human nature isn’t . . . right. If only we could be nicer to each other, if only we could spread more love. You get these people always in ultra left and communist groups, and next to them on the podium, next to them in the auditorium, [are] your utterly nihilistic, ruthless, virtually criminal types who want to use the structure of power when they get it to crush those underneath them, don’t give a damn about ideology, and are actually amongst the most misanthropic people you could ever meet. And you have these extremes of the innocent lovey and the sort of sadistic amoralist in the same group.
------------------------------------------
>All of the classical liberal thinkers from Adam Smith onwards who underpinned capitalism as an idea, Marx doesn’t think up an original theory in relation to them, he critiques them. All Marxism is a shadow; it’s a critique; it’s a sort of feeding on the carcass of something which exists before you. You critique it, you turn it around, you re-engineer it and you come to [unintelligible] on the basis of a negation. So the negation of that which exists before is the key to this type of thinking. And then you negate the negation, and then you negate the negation of the negation and you go on and on.
>The most radical version of state communism is Trotskyism, the idea that you have a regime that renews itself through endless and perpetual struggle. “There is no rest!” “there is no motion!” Trotsky wrote endless sentences like this “no love, no serenity, no stillness, no motion, only the struggle!” And of course Stalin took him at his word, which is why he purged them all from the party after 1928.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EFTe3AXo1o
>>18623574
based posts, love me some Mishima

>>18623463
You seem like an idiot with blind hatred for Communism without even understanding it but if you're capable of reading, stuff by Friedrich Hayek and Thomas Sowell is quite accessible.

>>18623519
Looks like I was right given you've basically admitted defeat.
>fug off they can't be reasoned with!
>>18623520
Marxism has nothing to do with convincing people. It establishes a material basis for history that examines conflict between classes as a centrifugal catalyst in human development. Grug vs weakling, plebs vs patricians, peasant vs feudal lords, guilds vs guild masters. All of human history has been a conflict where people act in self interest. If you are working at a factory, suddenly it occurs to you that you could own this whole building and reap the reward if you take it for yourself. Even the development and selfish nature of capitalism is Marxist. Marx reckoned that the workers would prevail in the inevitable class struggle as they were the larger class. Ironically so called marxist parties subverted and castrated any revolutionary potential because they wanted to "convince" people so they would be nice to them and let them talk about things in a civil way because they didn't want to hurt babies feelings and get spat in the face.

>>18623620
>they wanted to "convince" people
And they got severely blown the fuck out by smarter people than them.

>>18623493
>divorced from the natural world
Is Marxism social Darwinism now?

>>18623620
>All of human history has been a conflict where people act in self interest.
WRONG. Schmitt has shown that the Political is a friend-enemy dichotomy. People act (or better, acted before liberalism) for the betterment of their family, ethnic group and religion. It's why you get instances like the Crusades. There is no "Material" conditions in Norway for them to sail towards Palestine, BUT YET THEY DID.
The "Superstructure" SHAPED the "Base", not the other way around. Even he (Marx) himself said that his Materialist look couldn't explain ANY asian countries' history.
IT IS FLAWED AND IT SHALL REMAIN FLAWED!

>>18623637
>BUT YET THEY DID.
Meant to add "To impose their religious will."

>>18623629
Always has been, at least looking at Marx and Engels only.

>>18623493
I know how to pick the winning side and I utterly hate feminized pilpul academics like you
With that in mind, a revolution would result in you being tortured by me in the basement of the nu-Lubyanka, fucking neurotic triumphalist retard

>>18623612
>>18623614
>>18623620
>>18623628
>>18623629
>>18623637
>>18623640
>>18623650
>>18623652
shut up nerds nobody cares

>>18623653
SEETHE NEGRO
THE TIME SHALL COME, THEORY FAG

>>18623652
>I know how to pick the winning side and I utterly hate feminized pilpul academics like you
You clearly don't if you can't even see where your opponent falls. I'm not an acudummy. Academics are not working class and most would be forced into hard physical labor under a true marxist regime.

>>18623493
Daily reminder if you possess more than $5000USD in net wealth (including all assets), you would actually LOSE money from the implementation of global communism (communal appropriation and sharing of all goods and services between every single person on the planet).

>>18623691
>Academics are not working class and most would be forced into hard physical labor under a true marxist regime.
I mean, yeah, that's the end goal of communism.
By the way, why does Marx keep the rightoid midwits seething 150 years after he's dead? Why do you guys keep talking about communism when we're all living in the 21st century?

>>18623740
>Why do you guys keep talking about communism
Now, I identify with third positionist movements, but I'd answer: "it's because it is an important ideology which has shaped many ideologies in the present".
Like, e.g.
>One of the things that’s most germane to the Frankfurt School is the Frankfurt School repudiates those elements of communist practice that liberals don’t like: the harshness, the camps, the belief in struggle, the secret police, the art of the people, and the crushing out of anything that the people don’t like.
https://counter-currents.com/2012/05/marxism-and-the-frankfurt-school/
It is, in it's genesis, Marxian; and it needs to be CRUSHED, TRANSCENDED.

>>18623481
Joe Rogan, famous author of literature

>>18623554
Again: https://counter-currents.com/2012/05/marxism-and-the-frankfurt-school/
>Now, from one level if you were an extreme leftist now in the Western world, in Western Europe, maybe parts of Southern Europe (yes and no), and North America, you’d look around and you’d think there was a cultural desert, that you’d lost completely, that communism had collapsed, that far left movements have no votes at all, except residually in Italy, to a much smaller extent in France, and a few places elsewhere. You’d think that the socialist dream, that life could be better and more equal and free and so on, had come crashing down completely.

>And yet paradoxically, these people have lost a world and yet gained another, because their values, in a subtle way, in a mediated way, in a transliterated way, are the values that exist largely of the society out there. And when you go down and remove Sky Sport or put something else on and even there residually, you will find, what a Marxist would call, “the reification of triumphant values,” in other words a soft left viewpoint put again and again and again, in every media, at every level.

>Now how has this occurred? That a force that in a hard way seems to have lost everywhere: its states have gone down; its military structures have gone down. Its Chinese and Asiatic version is producing a mass, super-capitalist version, with an increasingly “post left,” indeed even racial elite that manage the society technologically and whose ideology is frozen into a type of theology. Many Marxists are in despair in this era, and the Frankfurt School, that we’re going to have a bit of a look at in this talk, actually in some ways is a movement of despair both within Marxism and within Western thinking. Yet, this victory in defeat and defeat in victory that we have all around us is something that I want to look at.

[...]
>Now my interpretation of this is that hard Marxism, strict Marxist Leninism and various anarchistic and other variants often to one side of it, have failed, but the trajectory of the ideology itself has succeeded, has morphed, and has transfigured itself in a new way. You have the left has come into the center, taken it, turned it around, and what we’d call liberalism now, either with a small or large “L,” is not the liberalism of fifty to sixty years ago. It’s not even the liberalism of a hundred and fifty years ago. The truth is that the people who led Palmerstone’s Liberal Party had views which in the middle of the nineteenth century, could be construed as people who, if not to the right of this gathering, then wouldn’t have been too far away.

>The Protestant ideological moralism that underpinned liberal ideas of a traditional sort has been ripped out. So it’s become a materialist and secularist ideology prone to infiltration and change by forces from its own radical left.

>>18623511
Only good post ITT, politics is a waste of time https://youtu.be/dREHzujMtoI

>>18623735
>daily reminder
hello r eddit/twitter

>>18623463
Communists do not exist any more in the same way the ideologies of ancient Greece do not exist any more
Ideologies are not eternal they are tied to time and place
You must let go of these antiquated categories that dominated the minds and culture of your forebearers and inherit your own time and place
If you continue to retread the same ground you will find yourself in a pit from which there is no escape

>>18623787
Again: >>18623819

>>18623463
>Recommend the most anticommunist literature
>I just fucking hate commies
That's an entirely wrong attitude, faggot. You are asking for a Talmud to tell you "Wrong is wrong!", meaning you don't have your own arguments and weighted opinions, only pre-existing butthurt.
Smart people treat texts as a chunk of code to salvage, debug and refactor, even if they disagree with them as a whole.

>>18623463
>Recommend
>anticommunist
As some *constructive* criticism, check Hannah Arendt's "The Human Condition". It does deal with the necessity to differentiate between "labor", "work" and "deed", and as such analyses what were the fundamental flaws with the Marx's project.

>>18623558
Please tell me you have stories frog

>>18623468
>>18623493
>>18623554
>>18623600
>>18623620
>>18623740
>>18623806

>>18623819
>the same way the ideologies of ancient Greece do not exist any more
People still study and believe in greek ideology and/or get inspired by it. Even Xi Jinping studies The Republic.
>Ideologies are not eternal they are tied to time and place
Is Christianity an ideology? If so, it transcends time and place.
>You must let go of these antiquated categories that dominated the minds and culture of your forebearers
Umm... No? You evaluate ideas based on how True they are, and not on the falsity that is societal orthogenesis.

>>18623493
I work a decent job and have used every opportunity to get there in conjunction with hard work.
You and some lazy ne'erdowells want to take that away because you seethe at natural order, yet you can't even run 5 miles without huffing.

>>18623806
>asspain
>decrease
What the fuck the wealth there is all sorts of fucked, some villages dont even have fucking running water

>>18623493
Post body

>>18623463
here you go OP

should be a free audiobook on amazon

>>18623894
> JEWS ARE BASED!!! the post

Read Moldbug, because not only is he an anti-communist but he names further reactionary reading in his works. So you'll move to things like Hoppe, Mises, Carlyle, Robert Filmer, etc. The biggest mistake anti-communists make is only arguing economics, when it takes a full understanding of reactionary politics to refute communism. This also allows you to catch a commie everytime they try to conflate every strain of right-wing thought with capitalism.

>>18623463
Leo Strauss. Start with the essay Three Waves of Modernity, which can be found with a quick Google search.

>>18624256
me work decent job and have use every opportunity to get there in with hard work.

but Grug and some meaniea want to take that away because they have big brain and muscle than me. It no fair!

>>18623463
We the Living
The Kolyma Tales

>>18624609
>Hoppe, Mises, Carlyle, Robert Filmer, e
All are compatible with Marx. Especially Hoppe.

fuck off retard. Go back to /pol/

>>18624753
Marx would have been a /pol/ poster.

>>18624609
also if you want a nice anticommie quip to own the libs with on Stereo you can say correctly that racism correlates with economic instability

Write a book about a political party that comes into power that pledges to terrorize commie scum and make it easy for ordinary folks to kill commies whenever they feel like it, e.g. you're hungry and you want some meat, so you kill a commie and grill it and invite your neighbors over for a potluck.

Write a book about citizens successfully challenging the government to change the law to permit farming commies for human meat.

write a book about a group of business leaders that invest in an anticommunist Moroccan league of assassins that kill Communist rats in central Europe and farm their meat

>>18624552
>Hayek

>>18624801
That’s not an “own”

>>18623463
Jacobin
Monthly Review

basically, anything that calls itself socialist or "Marxist-Leninist" is going to be more anticommunist than anything a right-winger could ever produce. just look for most popular works with these keywords

>>18624909
Marxism-Leninism is a right-wing ideology in the modern sense.

>>18623463
(1/5)

Adam Smith

- Notable ideas and contributions:

Free market
>Self-interested competition in the free market, he argued, would tend to benefit society as a whole by keeping prices low, while still building in an incentive for a wide variety of goods and services. Nevertheless, he was wary of businessmen and warned of their "conspiracy against the public or in some other contrivance to raise prices"
Division of labour
>Adam Smith foresaw the essence of industrialism by determining that division of labour represents a substantial increase in productivity.
Absolute advantage
>He described the principle of absolute advantage in the context of international trade in 1776, using labor as the only input. Since absolute advantage is determined by a simple comparison of labor productiveness, it is possible for a party to have no absolute advantage in anything.
The Invisible Hand
>This metaphor shows Smith's belief that when an individual pursues his self-interest under conditions of justice, he unintentionally promotes the good of society.

- Notable works: The Wealth of Nations; The Theory of Moral Sentiments

>>18625248
(2/5)

John Stuart Mill

- Notable ideas and contributions:
Public/private sphere
>Mill believed that public action required different values from private life and that those in public office, as well as voters, had a responsibility to act on behalf of public interests rather than “private partialities.”
Social liberty
>It meant for Mill putting limits on the ruler's power so that he would not be able to use that power to further his own wishes and thus make decisions that could harm society.
Harm principle
>"That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilised community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others." However he believed that it only could be applied in a civilized society with free speech where harmful arguments could be publically debated discarded.

- Notable works: On Liberty

>>18625255
(3/5)

Carl Menger

- Notable ideas and contributions:

Marginal Utility.
>Menger contributed to the development of the theory of marginalism (marginal utility), which rejected the cost-of-production theories of value, such as were developed by the classical economists such as Adam Smith and David Ricardo.

- Notable works: Principles of Economics.

>>18625261
(4/5)

Ludwig von Mises

- Notable ideas and contributions:

Economic calculation & Economic calculation problem
>Mises describes the nature of the price system under capitalism and describes how individual subjective values are translated into the objective information necessary for rational allocation of resources in society. He argued that the pricing systems in socialist economies were necessarily deficient because if a public entity owned all the means of production, no rational prices could be obtained for capital goods as they were merely internal transfers of goods and not "objects of exchange", unlike final goods.
Quantity theory of money
>The QTM states that the general price level of goods and services is directly proportional to the amount of money in circulation, or money supply. Mises agreed that there was a core of truth in the QTM, but said the theory "fails to explain the mechanism of variations in the value of money".
Austrian business cycle theory
>Grounded in the economic theory set out in Carl Menger's Principles of Economics and built on the vision of a capital-using production process developed in Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk's Capital and Interest, his early development of Austrian business cycle theory was a direct manifestation of Mises's rejection of the concept of neutral money and emerged as an almost incidental by-product of his exploration of the theory of banking in Mises's Theory of Money and Credit and in subsequent exposition and extension by F. A. Hayek.
Praxeology
>Mises adopted praxeology as a general conceptual foundation of the social sciences and set forth his methodological approach to economics.
Methodological dualism
>Ludwig von Mises' insistence on methodological dualism was a reaction against “the ‘methodological monism’ preached by behaviorists and positivists who saw no basic reason to approach human behavior and social phenomena differently from the way natural scientists approach molecular behavior and physical phenomena.”

- Notable works: Human Action, The Theory of Money and Credit

>>18623463
>recommend me books that confirm my previously held ideas
never gonna make it

>>18625268
(5/5)

Friedrich Hayek

- Notable ideas and contributions:

Economic calculation problem
>Building on the earlier work of Mises and others, Hayek also argued that while in centrally planned economies an individual or a select group of individuals must determine the distribution of resources, these planners will never have enough information to carry out this allocation reliably.
Catallaxy
>Catallactics is a praxeological theory, the term catallaxy being used by Friedrich Hayek to describe "the order brought about by the mutual adjustment of many individual economies in a market."
Dispersed knowledge
>He explained that price signals are the only means of enabling each economic decision maker to communicate tacit knowledge or dispersed knowledge to each other to solve the economic calculation problem.
Price signal
>According to Hayek, in a system in which the knowledge of the relevant facts is dispersed among many people, prices can act to coordinate the separate actions of different people in the same way as subjective values help the individual to coordinate the parts of his plan.
Spontaneous order
>Hayek viewed the free price system not as a conscious invention (that which is intentionally designed by man), but as spontaneous order or what Scottish philosopher Adam Ferguson referred to as "the result of human action but not of human design".
Austrian Business Cycle Theory
>According to the theory, the business cycle unfolds in the following way: low interest rates from fractional reserve banks tend to stimulate borrowing, which lead to an increase in capital spending funded by newly issued bank credit. Proponents hold that a credit-sourced boom results in widespread malinvestment. A correction or credit crunch, commonly called a "recession" or "bust", occurs when the credit creation has run its course.

- Notable works: Law, Legislation and Liberty; The Fatal Conceit; The Road to Serfdom

>>18625279
Okey now,

Short answer:

Smith's The Weath of Nations;
Mises' Human Action;
Hayek's The Road to Serfdom

>>18623463
Give it a look OP, I lasted an hour or more to make all these posts without being a largemouth like most of anons in this board

>>18625248
>>18625255
>>18625261
>>18625268
>>18625279
>>18625294

minorised

Read this OP

>>18623481
kill yourself

>>18623493
That's a nice post but then I remember that Russia is now a soulless husk due to communism but would have been a power to rule both Europe and Asia

Russian people turned evil, communist one-party mentality and corruption, and without faith and morality, streets filled with drug addicts

China is the same, chinese are souless money hungry moralless animals

>>18623519
>communism is mental illness

based, but not for the reasons you think

>>18625268
kys

>>18623463
>Recommend the most anticommunist literature possible

Witness by Whittaker Chambers is high on the list -- a classic. Highly recommend.

>>18623463
For me, its Brave New World.

>>18625626
no, you first