/lit/ - Literature

>>18531776
Synopsis?

>>18531776
Aren't they equally able to get jobs already?

>>18531776
>Economic Case for X
buzzword attracting bugmen and hylics, economics was not a concern prior to the Reformation and you wouldn't have had much more success making an economic case for X than you would have had making a meteorological case for X. BTW I don't think it's an accident that last four digits of your post are 1776 - the year when masonic satanic empire of United States was founded

>>18531781
>An economist demonstrates how LGBT equality and inclusion within organizations increases their bottom line and allows for countries' economies to flourish

>We know that homophobia harms LGBT individuals in many ways, but economist M. V. Lee Badgett argues that in addition to moral and human rights reasons for equality, we can now also make a financial argument. Finding that homophobia and transphobia cost 1% or more of a country's GDP, Badgett expertly uses recent research and statistics to analyze how these hostile practices and environments affect both the US and global economies.

>LGBT equality remains a persistent and pertinent issue. The continued passing of discriminatory laws, people being fired from jobs for their sexual orientation and/or gender identity, harassment and bullying in school, violence and hate crimes on the streets, exclusion from intolerant families, and health effects of stigma all make it incredibly difficult to live a good life. Examining the consequences of anti-LGBT practices across multiple countries, including the US, Canada, the UK, Australia, India and the Philippines, Badgett reveals the expensive repercussions of hate and discrimination, and how our economy loses when we miss out on the full benefit of LGBT people's potential contributions.

>>18531776
Does this break down the sociopolitical implications of Trans-activists claiming that their Trans-ness makes them unhousable?

>>18531798
>BTW I don't think it's an accident that last four digits of your post are 1776 - the year when masonic satanic empire of United States was founded

>>18531803
>An economist demonstrates how LGBT equality and inclusion within organizations increases their bottom line and allows for countries' economies to flourish
How badly did he need to fudge the numbers to get this one to swing?

>>18531798
Kek shows us watchers the truth.

>>18531776
...powerful.

>>18531814
Completely disregard the cost of troon treatment, especially in countries like Canada where they are even more of a net negative on society, for one.

Be nice to trannies or you'll be poor mkay?

is the reasons corps love gays so much because they don't have kids so they can spend all that income on other things?

>>18531803
NUMBERS GO UP
NUMBERS GO UP = GOOD

>>18531841
As consumers, yes, but they also love them as employees because having no family and less stable relationships means gays can work more hours.

>>18531841
corps would be interested in supporting fags even if it didn't have any positive effect on GDP. they'd still pander to the LGBT community in hope of capturing a bigger share of a fixed GDP

>>18531841
>corps love gays so much because they don't have kids so they can spend all that income
corps produce toys, food, clothes, books, etc.

>they don't have kids
I have bad news for you
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sperm_bank
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surrogacy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adoption

>>18531864
>I have bad news for you
still much lower percentage numbers

>>18531803
What are these discriminatory laws? Is the screeching justified?

>>18531841
>easier to market to
>impulsive
>troonies will spend a small fortune rearranging their peepees
>more likely to be some sort of antidepressants
>ps the corps and the elites are working to destroy society so they ‘build back better’
>what better way to do this than sodomy and usury
>read libido dominandi by dr e michael Jones

>>18531781
>>18531803
So an even shorter summary: compromising your morality is financial lucrative in an immoral world. Who would have thought.

YO BUT THINK OF ALL THE GAYS THAT CAN BE MID MANAGEMENT AT YOUR SOULLESS COMPANY? OK?!

>>18531798
based post

>>18531864
There's less than 22,000 children currently living with an LGBT parent.

>>18531803
>he thinks disparate impact style laws make the number go up
KEK

>>18531776
Does anyone really believe this book would have been published had they found out that LGBT are a pure deficit on society?
Economy is such a fucking joke, any book mentioning it in the title should be burned.

>>18531889
>>ps the corps and the elites are working to destroy society so they ‘build back better’
you want to know something I read about which jewish organisations were allowed under Hitler's Germany? The Labour zionists, most of the jews you hear about that were part of those that avoided the camps through things like the havara agreement were these degenerate zionists, those that were much much more traditional and conservative got sent to the camps, those that wanted to found israel didn't like them, they wanted a "new type of jew" for the twenty first century....

>>18531803
>>18531999
This reminds me of how activists wrote that we could "Unleash Black America" c. 1960s and have a massive increase in economic growth if we just weren't so hateful. Predictably this never happened, instead we just funneled money to mostly-white liberal government employees to enforce ever-changing "mandates" and upholding ever-changing "Values".

>>18531984
https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/lgbt-parenting-us/
>48% of LGBT women are raising a child
>170,000 children are being raised by 111,000 same-sex couples
>22,000 adopted children by 16,000 same-sex couples
>adopted

>ECONOMIC CASE FOR EQUALITY

>everything in life is about how much money you can make
no thanks

Just don't behave like a fucking fag at work problem solved. Regular people don't feel the need to describe their fetishes at work.

Fun fact: homosexual men are generally right wing on economic issues and earn more than the average non-fag.

>>18531781

>Gay men are on average more affluent, are more likely to have both partners working full time and enjoy shopping so catering to them will get you money
>pretending to care about trans rights will make your straight customers feel good
>lesbians are holding up the world market for high waisted mom jeans
>bisexuals like to feel special.

>>18531776
I'm pretty sure gay Jewish pedophiles are the richest demographic in the world.

>>18532061
>homosexual men are generally right wing on economic issues
Damn, they support traditional modes of profuction including communitarianism and corporatism?

>>18532033
>170,000 children are being raised by 111,000 same-sex couples
This is a heinous crime that needs to be rectified.

>>18532108
production and distribution*

>>18531841
families spend a damn lot of money on their kids though. consumerism isn't just plastic widgets and make up

>>18532127
Fags don't have to take time off to care for their children

>>18531864
>Linking wikipedia
you fucking bug

>>18532108
>>18532119
yes, why do you think they're so adamant on the issue of marriage and having adopted children?

>>18531776
»Wow...this book opened my ass...

>>18531776
I fucking hate liberals.

>>18531776
Im not going to lie being gay sounds pretty cozy, desu, but gay sex just makes me puke

>>18532108
Not quite. Fags are libertarian when it comes to economics because they have no family, shaky relationships, and no sense of community, and they are incredibly selfish, narcissistic, and borderline sociopaths.

When they say “equality” they don’t mean legal or social equality, since they are already protected classes.
“Equality” means “let us use your public schools and media to groom your children into our cult, we can’t survive otherwise.”

>>18531776
>M.V. Lee Badgett
>tfw you don't need to look at the early life section anymore, you just know

>>18531803
>1% of GDP to prevent trannies from ruining society
Sounds like a great deal to me

>>18532299
>they have no family, shaky relationships, and no sense of community
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_of_choice

>>18532108
>Damn, they support traditional modes of profuction including communitarianism
Yes, community is for fags

>>18531891
>MUH MORALITY
Spotted the slave

>>18532168
You posted cringe.

>>18531803
Based

>>18531798
>economics was not a concern prior to the Reformation
That's a bit of an exaggeration considering things like the Peasants Revolt. Look at the Ordinance of Labourers (1349) for example. It's very spiritually elevating to talk about economics being of no importance until everybody is eating their pets.

>>18532033
How often do dykes go for natural service vs the turkey baster?

>>18532127
yeah but they have lower luxury spending and more spending on necessities

>>18532810
You think corps don't benefit on people spending on necessities?

>>18532347
Family of choice and the traditional family are qualitatively different. The traditional family has biological parents who won't let a child do anything they because they know better than the child that it is against his best interests, whereas the chosen family lacks parental figures and members are chosen who have an individualist understanding of love and let's you do whatever you want, and the criteria is so arbitrary that a chosen family is basically just a circle of friends who let each other do whatever they want.

>>18531776
What the fuck is the point of this book?
Seriously do faggot have nothing better to do then complain at everything?
And I also think that >>18531798 is correct.
Let's hope that empire dies sooner rather then later.

>>18531841
Purpose engineered biopolitical clientele for the democratic party and multinational corporatioms a docile mass of consumer cattle who dont breed think or question authority.

>>18531776
What is some science or theory i can read which can help me check my privilege and learn more about the awful plight the diverse and vibrant culture of these warm body politically correct victimhood unit NPCs i mean these most noble and progressive of creatures?

>>18532010
Hmmm interesting I wonder why

communism and capitalism are two sides of the same, international, jewish coin.

>>18533219
>And then one day, for absolutely no reason at all...

>>18533219
The Criminal Codes, especially all the articles relating to moral corruption of children which could see these fuckers sent to prison for nearly a decade, but which are completely ignored by everyone who is charged with enforcing them.

>>18533219
>Perhaps one of the most disturbing attempts to undermine families can be seen in a slick video produced by LGBT in the City, a multi-media organization that produces talk shows and videos related to LGBT issues and is sponsored by such monster corporations as Telus and TD Bank. To say LGBT in the City has a hedonistic focus would be a grotesque understatement and it might be argued that at least one of their videos encourages the sexualization of children, specifically in the form of an eight year old boy mockingly named “Lactacia.”

>In a slick video released on Facebook with over one million views so far, a hyper-feminized/sexualized 8 year old boy (who some have compared to a drag version of JonBenét Ramsey) is featured partying in a hypersexual adult LGBT environment and telling kids watching that if their parents or friends do not support their desire to be drag (or trans), they need to get new parents and friends. Professional quality video and editing made this call to young children to the queer lifestyle all the more appealing. As “Lactatia” speaks to his peers, while an all too happy host leers, bold text leaps out at the viewer saying “YOU NEED NEW PARENTS! YOU NEED NEW FRIENDS!” You too can be a drag queen or transgender superstar and perhaps head out on the town to party with the wild LGBT boys and “Lactatia.” If your parents won’t get on board, they can simply be replaced with a new “glitter family.”

LOOK AT ME, WE ARE THE CAPITALISTS NOW

>>18531776
I mean have you tried bringing up nietzsche or any western philosopher for that matter around your local lgbtsjwtfnpchiv/aids cultural marxist cattle? In no time you will see their little stupid cowlike eyes light up in panic. Soon enough they will start with the usual subhuman bleating "wasnt he sexist? Arent you being dangerously eurocentric? Why read books by dead white men when you could have been streaming the latest diverse and inclusive workplace comedies at netflix hulu and disneygo? Didnt you know reading is ableist towards people who are too retarded to read? How does this further the short term electoral ends of the democratic party? Have you been taking your SSRIs and HRT? it is very important that you take the medication dr goldstein prescribed otherwise we will have to report you to corporate for mandatory sensitivity training as per the domestic terrorism act of 2021".

>>18532717
(you)

>>18533422
>>18533635
You people underestimate the staying-power of the LGBTQ+ "communities" - these are your eventual employers and your mandated scholars; the only way to survive in the surveillance state that will be (has been) implemented for their safety is to publicly adopt their language and mannerisms (Althusser once said that you must cloak yourself in your enemies language). The pendulum is never swinging back; not even the CCP can put the troonery in check.

>>18533717
I mean cant we just make them go away somehow, you know load them into trucks drive them out to the countryside, make them dig a nice big trench? Wouldnt the very air we breathe feel much cleaner?

>>18531803
Only 1%?
You are telling me that we can gas all these (((people))) and it will only cost us 1%?
Draft the papers I'm signing it

>>18531776
>M.V. Lee Badgett
>Woman
>Jewish
>Entire career is based around "minorities"
>name is literally Budget

Also
https://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=2590401

>>18533422
Based and Antelope Hill pilled

>>18533219
https://twitter.com/AydinPaladin/status/1396959010461454338
https://twitter.com/AydinPaladin/status/1396959564575256579

"I knew I was bisexual from about that age. My first crush was on a girl. I did not know how to approach her and have only been in long term het relationships, but I don't think going to Pride events really made me feel better about anything. IF anything, it scared me, personally."
"I had a bunch of thoughts like "oh, if I ask her out, then we're supposed to go flaunt it like this and hump in public?" and obviously, that's not the truth, but it was very confusing as a teenager. In retrospect, I should have asked her out, and it's not Pride's fault...but..."


https://twitter.com/AydinPaladin/status/1396967105216618497
https://twitter.com/AydinPaladin/status/1396968609965092865
"I spent a good portion of my life thinking I was a lesbian and just because I'm not, I don't get why I'm not part of the club."
"Which ultimately is a good thing; I don't want to be in your club."