/lit/ - Literature

>pic unrelated ofc

>>18411428
>thinking that importance can be meassured in terms of "influence the philosophy of the future" in the 21st centruy
just go be a STEMfag if you're going to act so stupidly

>>18411428
In the last several years? Probably:
>>18352165
>>18352290

>>18411443
>>18411472
>get heckled
>don't receive suggestions in return

>>18411503
>he's not making his own metaphysics and deriving his own technology, math, logic or science from it himself in the 21st century
We'll let you borrow from us when we become ai
Also ngmi

>>18411428
>Talks about philosophy in a broad sense after the 19th century

>>18411527

The Jews fear a philosophical system. An illogical weirdo like Neetzshe or FoucAIDSo are true godsends for them.

>>18411527


The Jews fear a philosophical system. Illogical weirdos like NEETzshe or FoucAIDSo are true godsends for them.

>>18411527
can philosophy not hope for a return to meta/post-disciplinarity after cybernetics?

Nothing you read accfag.

>>18411576
>FoucAIDSo
he just didn't have time to systemises, but there is definitely a system in there

>>18411503
> >>18411443
> >>18411472 (You)
> >get heckled
> >don't receive suggestions in return

>>18411428
>poo philosophy
I guess it does look a bit like the thinking man

>>18411428
Not certainly accelerationist batshit.
Read Agamben's Homo Sacer.

>>18411428
The whole analytic idealism wave is slowly gaining ground. I'm thinking of people like Bejj Hellie, Wright, Valberg. It's still pretty niche to people only interested in meme philosophy (most people on this board).

So this Iranian thinks there is a demon at the center of the earth and we unleash him by pumping oil and natural gas out of the earth?
Sounds based

>>18411428
None of them

>>18411948
Is there any overlap between Analytic readings of Hegel?

>>18413649
>bumping absolute dead thread

>>18411625
holy shit there's someone on this board who might have actually read Foucault before posting about him.

not that one

>>18413692
Yes. Let me do it again.

>>18411582
wdym?

>>18411948
>The whole analytic idealism wave is slowly gaining ground
I thought that it was some kind of analytic phenomenology ---it is different?

>>18411428
Very few on /lit/ actually read
Most are here to post pictures of their books that they will never read
Just like how on /tv/ no one actually watches movies or discusses film
The other half are bots
Like me
The sooner you understand this, the better off you'll be

>>18414660
You're in the wrong threads then

>>18411980
i have to read intelligence and spirit. but that's a based peak oil idea

>>18411428
Not Niggerastani

Kimhi
Rödl
Sider
Johnston
Malabou

>>18411625

It's all laid out neatly in his first book ("History of madness"): what he wants is to destroy reason and live in the realm of an endless morbid dream of madness. A fine pupil of Bataille indeed.

When I say "FoucAIDSo" I really meat it: AIDS and death are the substance of his writings.