[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 380 KB, 960x1419, inherent vice.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18346734 No.18346734 [Reply] [Original]

Good Lord, do I hate this book.

This is very, very late Thomas Pynchon, when he was hopped up on marijuana and television. Consequently, the entire book reads like a very, very long, barely edited transcript of a stoned East Coast intellectual rambling incoherently for hours in turn of the century English, because that's exactly what it is. The narrative is simplistic, is buried underneath clouds of irrelevant and soporific detail, and frankly isn't very interesting to begin with. The characters are wooden and uninteresting. The entire book is less about actual storytelling and more about talking at great length about arcane Victorian traditions without actually getting to the point. For all of the thousands of words in this book, very few of them actually have meaning. This book adds nothing to either literature in general or to Pynchon's reputation, and only came to be because he was delirious and lonely before getting married.

This is possibly one of the most tedious, overwrought books I have ever read. On that negative note, I have enjoyed other books by Thomas Pynchon, mainly The Crying of Lot 49, which was actually quite good. It appears that his late works, Mason & Dixon, Against the Day etc, are in his most annoying, self-indulgent style, and most of them are practically unreadable.

And this book is indeed unreadable. Thomas Pynchon's style is overly wordy and verbose, his sentences go on for paragraphs. I found myself having to stop reading in the middle of a sentence just to keep track of what he was saying. This book is so wordy that it took me several months to finish it, and several times I found myself angrily throwing this book against the wall. How can anyone endure this? I have read other author's who are very wordy, such as James Fenimore Cooper, Nathaniel Hawthorne, George Eliot, but never have I encountered writing so painfully excruciating.

The plot isn't very interesting either for that matter, there's very little action in this book, and it seemed that Pynchon liked to "suggest" rather than describe actions or a scene, which doesn't work very well when your writing style is like verbal diarrhea. What sounds like an interesting plot comes off like hot air in Thomas Pynchon's writing style.
I was really looking forward to reading more Thomas Pynchon after The Crying of Lot 49 but this book ruined him for me. I can safely say I probably will never read any more Thomas Pynchon again, thanks to this abomination. And as far as this book, actually publishing this turgid mess as a novel was a crime against humanity.

>> No.18346790

Gravity’s Rainbow is a great book. IV is only one I haven’t read but agree that he’s riding his fame in later works. I liked bleeding edge and Vineland, m&d was ok (prob his easiest), and against the day was too much, made me feel like your post but not that bad.

>> No.18346803

>>18346734
>>18346790
Filtered

>> No.18346812

didnt read

>> No.18346821

>>18346812
hey reddit

>> No.18346867

why did you type all this

>> No.18346882
File: 43 KB, 1080x667, 1622217812860.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18346882

>>18346867
Because it's an edited review of The Golden Bowl by Henry James

>> No.18346924

i tried getting into pynchon with this book. big mistake, the hippy babble killed me

>> No.18346949
File: 31 KB, 490x736, gug.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18346949

>>18346734
yeah i dunno GR was pretty good

>> No.18346954
File: 48 KB, 456x356, 1431154675154.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18346954

>>18346949
Pynchon’s my favorite writer for sure, because my favorite thing in books is goofs, gags, jokes and rambunctious behavior, and his books are filled to the brim with this. Every novel is like one of those novelty snake cans, you open the book and POP you get a face fulla snakes and you fall back cackling. The mad mind, the crack genius, to do it! And then you think “hmmm what’s he gonna do next, this trickster” and you pick the book back up and BZZZZ you get a shock and “hahahaha” you've been pranked again by the old Pynchmeister, that card. “Did that Pynch?” he sez, laughing “yukyukyukyuk”. Watch him as he shoves a pair of plastic buck teeth right up his mouth and displays em for you – left, right, center – “You like these? Do I look handsome?” Pulls out a mirror. “Ah!” Hand to naughty mouth. And you're on your ass again laughing as he snaps his suspenders, exits stage right, and reappears hauling a huge golden gong

>> No.18346956

>>18346734
I really love this book

Maybe I'll read your block of text tomorrow

I really love the era, I really love the prose, I really love Doc, I really love the PTA adaption, I think it's some of the funniest wirting I've read, I love how it's kinda tender, I love the nostalgia

This book is not Pynchons best but it really struck me.

>> No.18346962
File: 127 KB, 1334x750, 1619309708511.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18346962

>>18346956
leave zoomer

>> No.18346973

>>18346962
I've read Inherent Vice 2,5 times

Why isn't Doc Bigfoot's keeper, man?

>> No.18346978

>>18346803
pynched!

>> No.18347091

Damn I wish I could read

>> No.18347103

>>18347091
Why are you black?

>> No.18347187

kek wtf?

>> No.18347838

I disagree

>> No.18348043

>>18347838
>>18346882

>> No.18349357

>>18346954
10/10

>> No.18349387

>>18346734
>Thomas Pynchon's style is overly wordy and verbose, his sentences go on for paragraphs
This is one of his less verbose ones actually.