/lit/ - Literature

Bad take. Ideologies aren't falsifiable (i.e. they can morph to explain any phenomena). For example, something like "White Fragility' is a subroutine that demarcates outside criticism and redefines it within terminology set forth by the ideology (identity politics).

You can't tell if something is ideological by what it doesn't describe; you tell by how it describes literally everything and reappropriates language to do so.

>>18176063
The quote is talking more about performative rhetoric as opposed to practical, day-by-day action.

>You can't tell if something is ideological by what it doesn't describe; you tell by how it describes literally everything and reappropriates language to do so.
So what brand of white supremacist are you then?

>>18176249
The kind where I'll hate my own children because I married outside my race.

You're a retard (and an ideologue).

>>18176249
Why are black people unnecessarily verbose? Do they think it indicates intelligence (without realizing they really come off as charlatans to non-midwits)? They also like to say "so-called" (like it's a marker for deep thought, but anyone with a brain knows it's just a substitute for such).

They certainly love rhetoric though (too bad they don't read Plato and learn to distinguish sophistry from other types of discourse). I guess that's why the hustler preacher is such a common archetype in their culture.

lmao this pseud thread

>>18176624
"so-called pseud thread"

>>18176426
Kek

>>18176249
white supremacy and systemic racism don't exist. you're a through-and-through ideologue appropriating language and benefiting from the privilege of your existence as a first-world citizen. the whole purpose of your ideological modus operandi is to compensate for the meaningless and inferiority of your presence as a being-in-the-world and to feel wanted by others. you aren't oppressed, nor do you face any actual problems in your life.

>>18176003
1. every normative theory inherits a meta-theoretic basis
2. meta-theoretic systems can't be reified into "daily life"
3. every statement depends on a theory
4. every statement depends on something that can't be reified into "daily life"

>>18176249
you're using language and rhetoric invented by the Rockefeller Foundation and Ford Foundation.
>>18176552
i call it second-order mimesis. they aren't capable of the creative, preter-rational, first-order mimesis, which is real artistry. they're only capable of naïve, obvious, nonsubtle, second-order mimesis.

>>18177854
>>18178071
>>18178079
> le detached lower case
> sloppy and unnecessary use of philosophy vocab to make mundane ideas appear sophisticated.
I was half expecting to see a 'lol' or 'have sex incel' somewhere in all those words I didn't read.

>>18176003
>anarchist black panther
wow he combined two of the biggest cope ideologies

>>18178180
>how i know you don't read
btw "mimesis" isn't that complex of a word.

I CAN'T SNREED

>>18176003
>white supremacist society
lmao nice bait retard kys