/lit/ - Literature

Serious question: why the fuck do you even care? Why would you waste even a shred of time caring about something that doesn't effect you and presents no harm to anyone?

>>18134639
intellectuals are desperate to be part of the ruling class, and historically this was hugely developed only in humanism, hence all the thinkers nowadays are humanistic, atheist. Humanism is based on the fantasy that humans are better than animals, because humans have ''''''''''''''''''''rationality'''''''''''''''''''.

For instance, when americans voted for trump, they were '''''''''''''''''''''''''rational''''''''''''''''''''''''''

Humanism was strongly tied to science because it's science which improved the '''human condition'' [ie hedonism] and the humanists sold humanism in a bundle with science.

Communists rode the science meme and they fucked up big time, so now leftists are antiscience, in order to salvage their Human Rights

. Leftists are torn apart by science, because science id double edge for them, they want the science authority to avoid communism falling into relativism, but they hate science when science contradicts them

>>18134653

Harm to anyone? They hormonize children of 8 years.

>>18134658
And how does that effect you? How do you know it's not beneficial to the individual?

>>18134657

There is a way to enter in reason a leftist?


>>18134663

It's not benefical to the child, there are hormones. It affect me because I am paying that treatments with my taxes, knowing that is impossible to turn a man in a woman.

It's like impotence (for now)

>>18134681
reading too many conspiracy theories my guy

>>18134681
>being against trannies because of muh tax money is paying for it
lmao this is so weak you boomer, any normal person is against it because it's bad for society

>>18134663
> How do you know it's not beneficial to the individual?
And there goes your claim to the side of rationatlity

refute this logic

https://philarchive.org/archive/BARRAS-6

>>18134658
And you think somehow logic will save the day? Funny.

>>18134735

>bad for society

Exactly, i wrote that. Children getting hormones. The pax thing is a way to say "my goverment laughs about prosperity"

>>18134746
> ought

>>18134746

They can't birth. Huge bones. Diferent genetic that womans.

Logic refuted.

>>18134757

I have some ideas to change the game, but I need time.

>>18134639
>why logical is important
>>18134653
This
>>18134657
>all the thinkers nowadays are humanistic, atheist
Okay I guess post- and anti-humanism totally weren't massive trends in Western thought. Reed moar
>>18134658
There is no trans cabal forcing 8-year-olds to get HRT.
>>18134663
This, I know many people who view their 'natural' puberty as a sort of trauma, something they wish they never would have went through.

>>18134681
>It affect me because I am paying that treatments with my taxes
No you aren't. In the US we don't have public healthcare, for one. Second of all, you don't seem to be miffed at all that nearly all of your tax dollars go to the military.

>>18134735
>it's bad for society
Good.
>>18134757
This also even though I probably disagree with you on the notion of trans people

>>18134794

I'm in Argentina, here we have public healthcare. We spent like 10.000.000 of pesos in testosterone to womans. Also, we don't have military, so, we are with the pants lies down.

>>18134739
In what way am I forgoing rationality?

>Hi, everyone, I need a book that will confirm and bolster a position I already hold, I definitely want this because I'm clearly correct and not just because I want my point of view reinforced

Just kys you retard

>>18134658
Choirmasters have been getting young children to harmonise for centuries. It'll never cease, I'm afraid.
Also, OP: learn to compose a sentence, you absolute specimen.

>>18134639
There is no human race, it's a species constituted of several sub-species.

>>18134894
By disregarding an in controversial principle tied to the fundamentally presumed morality regarding care for children.
You’re entirely disregarding the need to protect a group who categorically needs protection. You haven’t come out and said it, but it follows logically that you don’t care about their safety, unless you consider ingesting chemicals to be as meaningless as investing water in which case your aren’t disingenuous but just immensely stupid, I wouldn’t put either past you tho desu

>>18134653
>no harm to anyone

Yikes.