/lit/ - Literature

>>18074474
Natural law doesn't mean 'necessarily happens', it refers to natural rights and there is an actual theory behind it.

>>18074474
That's why the Soviet Union won, and why niggers keep winning. So, true.

>>18074474
I feel like all online rightists are just people that never grew up from 2014, gamergate and "gamerbro" politics, and that adolescent phase of watching sjws get destroyed videos.

>>18074501
Yes, because the Right has been neutered into believing in Christicuckery. You're right

>>18074474
Actually, no, retard Nietzsche actually rejected "might makes right." He accused socialists of doing that. He wasn't fan of violent, nihilistic beasts. The Ubermensch is not a vengeful person.

>>18074474
Small wins is all you faggots ever get. Natural law always prevails in the end.

>>18074523
Nietzsche praised Machiavelli. Nietzsche also despised passiveness

>>18074523
Might does make right tho. Why would I care what some moralfag has to say if I could squash them like an insect?

>>18074518
What are your mature political views let's hear them

Let's go boys

>>18074527
Being passive doesn't mean you have to be vengeful. That's just resentment.
>>18074527
He also praised Spinoza and Epicurus - what is your point?
>>18074537
Sure, you don't have to care. Just like nobody has to care about you. The feeling is mutual.

>>18074549
>Being passive doesn't mean you have to be vengeful. That's just resentment
I'm vengeful at Christcucks who believe that their God will ultimately save them and they don't have to do anything. Resentment is that person who engages in a game - losses and still is bitter about it. The Right hasn't given the Left a proper fight since 1939.

>>18074547
How is Schmitt relevant here?

>>18074474
>actually follow the trial
>jurors still convict him on all counts (including 2nd degree)
Violence and intimidation works, disregard any replies in this thread that says otherwise.

>>18074547
Explain Schmitt bro

>>18074562
Explain what Bergman would say about this, lets get this thread theoretical

>>18074558
Much of Schimtt's thought is essentially the aphorism 'might is right' placed in a legal context.

>>18074557
Why would you hate Christ cucks when it was good who created them in the first place? Why would you hate people who have no control of their lives, and are simply just programmed to do what their environment tells them. I doubt you always had your political views.

>>18074574
They can't

>>18074576
It's not

i wonder if this will encourage rightoids to wake up

>>18074523
The Ubermensch would still destroy without mercy, like Caesar to the Gauls.

>>18074587
That the law is governed by a sovereign who can 1)decide on the state of exception and 2) relies on extra legal force to enforce the state of exception, is a basic appeal to force and authority.

>>18074574
I just picked that picture from my folder because it fits the mood.

>>18074496
This.
Qtards will never be vindicated. Just like Americans will never win a war.

>>18074576
>t. has never read schmitt

I'm glad we agree OP.
That's why I see absolutely nothing wrong with white genocide.
Jews have proven themselves the stronger ones, they control every institution in the West, all this while only accounting for 0.2 % of the world's population.
They deserve to win.

>>18074610
Nothing to do with might is right. That's just efficient political organisation to achieve one's goals but it doesn't say or imply that it must be right in the sense of being just which is what might is right refers to

>>18074605
No, the Ubermensch would not. Nietzsche explicitly denounced the terror you defend because saw socialists doing it. He had praise for beasts like you. The Ubermensch creates his own values; he doesn't follow nonsensical "good v. evil" Christian spitefulness dichotomy that still infects your infantile brain. He even rails against your entire concept of punishment in the Twilight of Idols as "bestiality of thought." And he certainly have a high opinion of beasts.

>>18074588
No lol. If you look at american history the moment they might have fought back is extremely clear: when they were ethnically cleansed from their own cities, really starting in earnest in the 60s. That was it, and they decided to go to the suburbs instead of revolt because life was too comfy.

>>18074474
Tucker is based as fuck. How do they let him stay on air? You can’t even do the honeypot/controlled op type criticism because he’s redpilling boomers/normiecons, not trying to make some movement.

>>18074633
Hot. Kikes will get genocided like usual though.

>>18074642
Nietzsche was against the Social Darwinists of his time, but you are still painting a picture of the Ubermensch that isn't totally accurate. A Dionysian joy in destruction is central to the concept.

>>18074474
>You are a faggot
>If you say that is wrong I will cut your head
>Therefore I'm right in the statement that you are a faggot
Are you OP?

>>18074537
>>18074633
>>18074605
You have an underdeveloped/damaged prefrontal cortex.

>>18074538
I’m honestly a democratic socialist or whatever it’s called (I like Sanders and agree generally with pretty much everything Chapo Trap House says) and one of the biggest reasons that chuds piss me off is they intentionally try to poke at the sleeping bear that is black America and black people more globally. I don’t know how you can look at black men and not view them as pretty much superior to whites in every way. They’re stronger, bigger and more composed than us and less prone to weird cringey behaviour. Like 99% of the alt right is guys who are insecure about black “superiority” and athleticism. It’s Freudian. They’re the closest thing the planet earth has to a legit master race (definitely not a bunch of doofuses in lederhosen) and it would be best to not provoke them. Normally I wouldn’t care if the chuds did this, you know get blacks to massacre them, but sadly I’m also white and I don’t want to be lumped in with these retards.

>>18074640
Establishing legal precident is precisely defining what right is in a purely practical sense.

>>18074679
Lol