/lit/ - Literature

>>18005434
He's too secretive. Our generation's shining literary beacon is Rice Cock Waldun.

>>18005482
Waldun is rightwing?

>>18005519
I define the left and right-wing dichotomy as the pole by which one's beliefs are most closely aligned with the truth. Waldun's prose and subcontext are undoubtedly divinely inspired and given that he is a right-wing writer. With your posts, often revolving around Egoism, Nihilism, and Hedonism, you are left-wing given how detached from the truth you aren (or, in other words, cringe as opposed to based).

>>18005543
*you are (...).

>>18005543
I’m not nihilistic.
The truth is revealed by Stirner and Epicurus. You misunderstand them completely. I can only hope you’re joking.

>>18005571
Nietzsche's philosophy is the nihilistic counterpart to Kierkegaard's life-affirmation

>>18005571
From what I can recall you like Nietzsche which most likely makes you a cringe nihilist, especially if you base your values on egoism and hedonism

>>18005582
Ah yes,nietzsche the hedonist

>>18005611
I was talking about butters' beliefs

>>18005576
Wrong.

>>18005582
Wrong, wrong and wrong.
Firstly, Stirner’s book was poorly translated, though you probably haven’t gotten past the cover “Ego and...” that’s not the title. This is. The ego is the self. Though the man wrote mirthfully, he was not the *egotist* advocating fool Ayn Rand.
Secondly, Nietzsche was concocting an actually reasonable way to deal with the end of deisms. Kierkegaard’s method was to pretend nothing happened.
Lastly, Epicurus isn’t a hedonist. That was Aristippus. Epicureanism is negative hedonism, and similar to Daoism
Don’t mischaracterize them or me in the future, please

>>18005662
>Wrong, wrong and wrong.
>Firstly, Stirner’s book was poorly translated, though you probably haven’t gotten past the cover “Ego and...” that’s not the title. This is. The ego is the self. Though the man wrote mirthfully, he was not the *egotist* advocating fool Ayn Rand.
>Secondly, Nietzsche was concocting an actually reasonable way to deal with the end of deisms. Kierkegaard’s method was to pretend nothing happened.
>Lastly, Epicurus isn’t a hedonist. That was Aristippus. Epicureanism is negative hedonism, and similar to Daoism
>Don’t mischaracterize them or me in the future, please

>>18005662
If you actually read Stirner you’d be cool. None of your dumbass posts (I’ve unfortunately read many of them) indicate any knowledge of the text.

>>18005668
You’re saying you will continue to mischaracterize?

>>18005696
You’ve read Rand, I see. Don’t type to me.

>>18005736
>You’re saying you will continue to mischaracterize?
yes because I don't respect your positions. Even gnostics are deserving of greater respect. I fucking hate gnostics.

>>18005742
You worship the demiurge and are going to his hell

>>18005754
No I'm a protestant dual aspect idealist panentheist with based characteristics so no I don't think so.

>>18005759
I didn’t say you were a Papist

>>18005742
significantly more cringe than butterfly himself desu ne
it's one thing to be a tripfag, but far more pathetic to let a tripfag reduce you to a seething zombie like this

>>18005773
I appreciate that. Papist whores and their piss-poor theology. Drives me sick.
>>18005776
eat a Brazilian cock

>>18005434
Dennis Prager is much influential. I don't know why /lit/ doesn't talk about him more. Probably because how leftist it is here

>>18005785
because a subversive zionist jew

>>18005785
This.