/lit/ - Literature

>>17994698
Because it’s not lot related to chase after pol daddy figures. Take your IDpol where it belongs

Uhmmmm BASED?

>>17994698
Why should I listen to this guy when he raised a whore daughter and gave himself brain damage with drugs?

Jordan taught me to pull myself up by my foreskin and live on beef and benzos

>>17994698
Because he’s a charlatan and a drug addict. Anyone who sees him as a surrogate father figure need only look at his daughter to realise what kind of man he is

>>17994707
>jp
>idpol
Lol he is a psychologist.

>>17994698
>muh he talked about subjects he didn't know about therefore all he says is wrong and he is le cringe human being
>muh he used [legal, recommended by a (((psychiatrist)))] drugs.
>muh his daughter is a whore

Because all of this invalidates everything he can possibly say. Just as Marx is irrelevant because he raised suicidal sons and therefore nothing he ever wrote should be read.

>>17994725

I think anyone seeing him as surrogate father precisely mirrors their own real defective parents

You just know

>>17994725
>Because he’s a charlatan and a drug addict. Anyone who sees him as a surrogate father figure need only look at his daughter to realise what kind of man he is

None of those are valid critiques of his ideas. Personal failings do not refute someone's work, neither does your interpretation of his daughters life - who you do not know.

You sound like a women, a Twitter leftist or a teenager. Either way I'd suggest reading some books before posting again.

Best of luck, kiddo.

>>17994778
>Personal failings do not refute someone's work
It kinda does when that work is building up a cult of personality fanbase of no nonsense tough love

>>17994778
Try to explain such an epic public psychiatric failure using lobster mans ideas

>>17994724
lol

>>17994792
>building up a cult of personality fanbase of no nonsense tough love
imagine strawmanning this hard.

>>17994778
>None of those are valid critiques of his ideas. Personal failings do not refute someone's work, neither does your interpretation of his daughters life - who you do not know.
I didn’t set out to critique his ideas, I set out to critique his drug abuse and the fact that he talks about knowing the answers to societal issues yet he almost died of a benzo addiction and thus is in conflict with his own belief system. If he was so sure of his own positions would be not apply them to his own life? Also, being a psychologist it’s likely that he would have been cognisant of the personal and psychological development of his own daughter. A daughter who grew up to be a whore who ruined her daughters life by destroying her family, makes money from horny desperate weirdos by posting sexually charged pictures and charging money to join cults based on eating meat and owning libs.

>You sound like a women, a Twitter leftist or a teenager. Either way I'd suggest reading some books before posting again.

This doesn’t require a response.

>>17994707
Lit*
Not lit related

>>17994731
His fame comes from Koch Industry funding, just like Abigail Shapiro’s brother

>>17994814
lmao new to the internet I assume?

>>17994737
Marx is pretty irrelevant yeah

>>17994877
I suppose you're an oldfag returning from the time where no nonsense tough love was still a thing. When was it? 2014? 2016?

>>17994698
i liked that time he made up some lie about almost dying from drinking some apple cider when it was all just benzos lmao

>>17994893
Just saying, he made the rounds on pol for his muh Alberta bootstraps bucko content

>>17994778
Sperg-tastic post, truly.

>>17994778

>>17995020
People that can't win the argument makes ad hominem arguments to try to cover that up.

>>17995037
It depends on the argument. Saying that a person who claims to be a behavioural expert can be called into question is a valid criticism. Saying someone shouldn’t have an opinion on economics because they are sexually promiscuous is not valid.

>>17995068
It's more like saying someone who is a pedophile should not be a school teacher

>Acshually the goldman Sachs and raytheon DO hire brown transvestites if they have the merit, leftists btfo I'm saving the freaking west!

>>17994803
there is no heaiecrhy in terams of myntale and fisicle abilitys

>>17994719
because his daughter was first giving signs of being mentally ill at 13, which he dealt with by taking her to a drug dealer.

>>17994724
Well said, heh.

You guys are way too hard on Jordan Peterson. He seems like a nice guy. who has suffered a lot of pain lately. I hope his wife is okay too.

I feel bad because he gets hit hard from both the left and right and only really Joe Rogan normie guys like him. He’s not even really that transphobic either.

>>17995232
Kek

>>17994778
I actually agree with your point, but your rhetorical skills could use some work.

>>17995733
>he’s not even really that transphobic either.

>>17995890
Isn’t his stance officially that he would use pronouns if asked but not if the government forced him to?

Doesn’t seem that transphobic to me... there are literally people who want to beat trannies to death in North America. He’s really not that far to the right of the issue lol. Idk, I’ve never read Peterson so I wouldn’t know

idk if it's worse that there'd be one obsessed retard spamming peterson threads or instead enough underaged autist to be doing it organically still in the year 2021. This shit is so played out, there's nothing new to say. Move on to a new daddy figure already

What even is this thread?

>>17995733
>He’s not even really that transphobic either.
Implying disgust for trainoids is abnormal.

Wash your penis.