/lit/ - Literature

>>17915088
The words are coming out all weird

>>17915088
What if words were turds?

>>17915088
mental hospital

>>17915088
The Logic of Sense

>>17915088
Back to Heidegger's Grand Livre/Turn, a re-reading of Nietzsche and a close study of Derrida.

>>17915096
>In his Pseudoproblems in Philosophy, he asserts that many philosophical problems are meaningless.
Alright I'll just take this random nigga's word for it then lmao

>>17915096
also
>logical positivism
into the trash it goes

>>17915088
Being and Time, Division 3

>>17915130
You're not supposed to agree with the verification principle in 2021 which barely figures in that book. Deleuze's transcendental empiricism was influenced by Hume, an empiricist. Turns out Carnap was working out similar themes ahead of Deleuze, and those can come apart from the verification principle.

>>17915202
this post is so moronic i don't even know where to begin. Carnap and Deleuze are not working out "similar themes" simply because they have an intimate relationship to the Empirical Tradition (whatever this even means anymore after the 20th century).

>>17915218
Have you read the Aufbau?

>>17915221
Have you read Deleuze? What does Transcendental Empiricism hold in common with Carnapian Nominalism? Besides a vague reference to explication/the virtual?

>>17915237
Why don't you characterize transcendental empiricism for us? I have an answer, but I'd rather you provide your own satisfactory definition of it than I give one for you. Then we can discuss Carnap in relation to Deleuze.

Logic of Sense or back to Anti: Oedipus I'm afraid of A Thousand Plateaus

>>17915512
QRD on a thousand plateaus.
How is it in respect to Anti-O?

>>17915528
You're asking me? But I already told you I'm too afraid to read it. All I know is they abandoned Oedipus as what they're fighting against and they've introduced rhizomes, segmentary (molar) lines, molecular lines, and lines of flight (which are molecular) as new vocabulary. Lines of flight are basically difference and are captured in order to actualize an identity and their escape is a process of deteritorialization or something. I don't very much about any of this, I promise.

>>17915585
dont know how to feel about an anime girl being posted, but
good. They dropped the wird psychoanalysis shit and elaborate more on the philosophical aspects free from oedipus. this is good. why are you scared?

>>17915723
I'm afraid I'm too stupid to grasp it, or even worse, too stupid to realize I'm not grasping it.

>>17915585
>>17915528
In AO they were analyzing a specific form of power in society, then they became interested in how power exists in societies and hierarchies in the broadest sense. There’s an interview Guattari gave in NYC in the 70’s where he talks about it. The works are very much connected, despite their reputation of being disparate.

>>17915088
Become a tranny.

>>17915088
we go back to Frege and Husserl

>>17915096
Where are you now?

>>17916080
Being and Time, Division 3

>>17915528
Much more elaborate because they got rid of psychoanalysis and rephrased/rethought the concept of body without organs as rhizome.
But the amount of references reading this book requires is enough to keep you busy for at least the next couple of years.

>>17916026
Cover looks eeriely comfy.
Not OP but this looks nice, thanks.

>>17916026
Is this the meme trilogy no. 2?

>>17915088
leave aside the pseud shit, don't skip the practice problems

>>17919789
I'm trying to finish up through chapter 8 of Principles, deriving Taylor's theorem right now. How is Papa compared to Baby Rudin in general? Would you recommend it specifically for learning complex analysis over any other book, given I have the background of the recommended Principles chapters, or is there some other analysis book that has a similarly refined 'logical flow' that would be preferable?

>>17915088
Simondon's doctoral thesis (Individuation in Light of Notions of Form and Information). It's the New Game+ version of D&R.

>>17916026
You've still yet to give a summary of these books. Til you do, you can't prove this isn't just a meme.

>>17920116
This isn't mcdonalds

>>17920272
Ok meme man.

>>17920116
>>17920272
>>17920404
We're waiting meme man

>>17919844
I recommend Rudin not because you get a better understanding (if you get it, you get it, just do the exercises and you'll be fine), but because it's well written. Simple, elegant and there's a lot of "awestruck" moments where the beauty of the subject shines through.