/lit/ - Literature

Mein Kampf

>>17848677

im a tranny

>>17848712
What do you think of this/\?

>>17848677
If we can get the field niggers to hate the house niggers they won’t team up and take over the plantation.

>>17848677
Not exaggerating, being completely and totally genuine when i say i hope her parents get raped and killed by a pack of niggers. For her own good. Then she won't grow up to be a self loathing sad sap, and her parents clearly deserve it regardless.

>>17848731
>[
What about this woman?

What books will teach me how to be a shitposting retard? Stirner?

>>17848737
Yeah same deal, although boys are much more likely to realize its horseshit even without tragedy, so it might not be necessary. Chances are those kids will grow up at least distasteful of social justice.

start with the greeks

>>17848677
How ironic that she seems to be standing in a shabby, run down passageway. Our culture is sick and the elites are taking it to the bank. The ignorant deserve the hell they craft for themselves.

>>17848677
None.
You would have to want to learn.

>>17848781
>the elites
you can just say the capitalists

>>17848731
This isn't /b/.

>>17848711
Best me to it anon, holy based more people need to know about this book

T. Castizo

>>17848791
Sneed

>>17848677
This explains the phenomenon.

>>17848731
based

>>17848739
It's something you're born with
also yes stirner

>>17848807
interesting

>>17848677
What’s it like being a media slave?

>>17848711
Caucasians of today are a far cry of what they once were. I can appreciate this work... but is it even relevant at this point?

>>17848911
Of course not.

>>17848911
>but is it even relevant at this point?
Even if it wasn’t, what does it relevancy matter, it is a fascinating and exciting look at history that you will come out from reading with a greater outlook on European history than you got from school, and in a shorter time. Things in the world will make more sense in the context of history, the book itself is of intrigue but so will the things it gives context for. At least for me, it is more in testing than any television show, music, video game, anime or other nonsensical distraction from the Protocols. But though most “caucasians” as you say are indeed not like their ancestors, someone great will come along eventually out of millions.

The decisive argument against the "colorblind" view of immigration is that racial groups have interests, and refraining from taking ethnicity and/or race into account when making immigration policy does not lead to any real egalitarianism in terms of the relative power distinct racial groups have; There is still privilege, although what group takes it over is determined by the free movement of people. For instance if you have a white majority that dominates society socio-politically as the "default" national identity, allowing large amounts of non whites immigrating into the country will lead to a new group forming a majority and inheriting privilege. This argument could be expanded to support white identity politics in general, ie the recognition that racial interests are real and that white racial interests are as legitimate as any other (as opposed to the current situation of the "left" supporting minority racial interests only and the "right" opposing them all)

>>17848711
So it's just anglo-saxon history?

>>17849123
No

>>17849170
So it's just "everyone relevant in history was white like me"?

>>17849179
No

>>17848711
Based

>>17848677
the big book of mental illness

>>17849107
>For instance if you have a white majority that dominates society socio-politically as the "default" national identity, allowing large amounts of non whites immigrating into the country will lead to a new group forming a majority and inheriting privilege.
whites have the lowest ingroup preference out of all racial groups
there are hundreds of studies corroborating this
by your definition there is no white privilege since whites do not vote in a bloq bigger than the next demographic