/lit/ - Literature

White heterosexual male Anglo utterly BTFO

Oh no non-white people existing in media what has the world come to

>>17738041
It's part of a trend that will only grow of infantilising everyone and everything.

>>17738092
That is if this thread is about the "older children" thing lol.

>>17738041
The drag queen in the white jacket is so hairy

>>17738086
The issue isn’t non-white people existing in media, it’s white people non-existing in media.

>>17738092
>>17738101
You're a fucking idiot. There is nothing infantalising about the phrase "older children."

>>17738041

>>17738152
Anglos got what they deserved

>>17738041
Most people now, and specially left-adjacent progressives, are very infantilized. We pretty much have a generation of adult children.

All adults were once children. Now they’re older.

>>17738224
>>17738239
The title isn't talking about adults it's talking about~12 year olds.

>>17738251
My point still stands.

>>17738275
Not really. You just made a statement and didn't back it up at all.

is this some sort of post-dogwhistle messaging where you have to construct your own underlying signal?

>>17738152
I really fail to see what's so bad about this. People are people all the same.

>>17738481
gr8 b8 m8

this thread is incomprehensible to me.
im just mad that some group of people in the media thinks that this art style is beautiful and is the future of our aesthetics, cause I've seen it anywhere, but anyone who actually likes it is someone I never want to meet

>>17738041
>gross art style
>non-whites of questionable sexually
>juxtaposition of the phrase "older children" with the art style vaguely insinuating pedophilia
Unironically just leftists being edgy. Its the liberal equivalent of "triggering the libs". They know exactly what they are doing but going to Motte and Bailey you if you complain about it.

>>17738127
Several people in the picture could be seen as white

>>17738481

>I'm not white, and I feel at home!

The implication is that if london were mostly white, then he could not feel at home. And whites no like nger feel at home there

>>17738604
ok chud

>>17738146
Depends what age range they’re actually referring to, desu
12-15 sure, np
20-30 big problem

>>17738983
>And whites no like nger feel at home there
that's because whites are whiny faggot pussies. london isn't your safe space lmao, fuck off wh*tes

>>17739024
>the reveal
It’s always the same isn’t it: posturing as reasoned and benevolent until your ‘logic’ is sufficiently challenged to cause you to show your true colors and revert to a sort of “muh dick, white boi” thesis underlying everything.
tl;dr kys faggot, all the seething the world won’t change the fact you can’t create decent society without whites

>>17738481
So the nazis did nothing wrong? I mean the jews are no different than germans after all

>>17739059
didn't even read your post chud, whites are dying off and there's nothing you can do about it. Cope

>>17739081
>didn’t even read
color me shocked, that totally doesn’t sound right for an intellectual such as yourself ;)

>>17739081
>didn't even read your post chud

>>17739097
>color me shocked
we'll color your country brown wh*te
you can't stop us

>>17738481
No

>>17739113
Tell all your friends on the BBC discord I wish you guys good luck in trying to get your asses fucked by negroes

>>17739024
You're also implying non-whites are whiny faggot pussies.

Oof.

>>17739113
I don't think there's anything sadder than white soibois larping as joggers lmao

>>17738966
>could be seen as

>>17739137
>>17739142
>>17739153
seethe chuds

>>17739162
>chuds

>>17739160
>afraid of subjunctive

>>17739173
yes chud, you are a CHUD

>>17739160
Since some of them are green

>>17739195

>>17738041
The title seems fairly self descriptive.

>>17739081
lol the only one coping is gonna be you trying to live out of a mud hovel