/lit/ - Literature

>>17733032
Kiss Me Deadly by Mickey Spillane

you aren't interesting

Deleuze - Nietzsche and Philosophy (it sounds like you just hate slave morality, more than anything)

perhaps the 'nomadic' aspects of Deleuze would appeal to you, also

>>17733032
Who do you think you are? Heidegger?

>>17733048
I'm interested in this nomad thing; what books

>>17733061
A Thousand Plateaus

>hate

ayn rand probably

>>17733061
>The annals of official philosophy are populated by "bureaucrats of purereason" who speak in "the shadow of the despot" and are in historical com-plicity with the State.3 They invent "a properly spiritual... absolute State that... effectively functions in the mind." Theirs is the discourse of sovereign judgment, of stable subjectivity legislated by "good" sense, of rocklike iden-tity, "universal" truth, and (white male) justice. "Thus the exercise of theirthought is in conformity with the aims of the real State, with the dominant sig-nifications, and with the requirements of the established order.
Sounds kinda based I'm picking it up
>>17733078
What is her best book

>>17733107
the fountainhead

>likes Stirner
>hates anarchists
Are you have brain damage?

>>17733165
Stirner wasn't an anarchist. He attacks them in his book as being moralists like Proudhon, and his attacks on communism completely throws out retardation of merging the two currents out the window. You must one those reddit egoists who haven't read Hegel, or realize, that Stirner translated The Wealth Of Nations. Stirner only became an anarchsit philosopher after his death. The same retards that call Stirner an anarchist think Taoism and Zen is "anarchism" Nor does he call for overthrowing the state, and an conscious egoist could certainly use the state for their own ends.

>>17733165
>Are you have brain damage
>Are you have brain damage
Do you?

>>17733198
>Friedman criticizes Keynes
>Therefore Friedman is not a capitalist
this is your reasoning

>>17733165
Stirner was an anarchist,but if totalitarism pleases you then there is no reason left to be an anarchist

>Why are you a fascist
>It pleases me to be a fascist and support fascism
That's literally it

>>17733032
>Supports Capitalism
>Hates anarchists

This person needs to read Stirner and Nietzsche again, then read the Bible with a more critical but also more mystical lens, then needs to get laid jesus fuckin christ

>>17735602
You haven't read Stirner, have you? That's not what Stirner is saying at all

>>17735726
>mystical
You mean delusional?

>>17735740
Yes?
Something wrong with that?

>>17735759
wow bro you're so based for subscribing to retarded beliefs

>>17735770
Thanks I'm having a lot of fun with it.

>>17733032
you aren't interesting

>>17735740
Nope, I mean mystical.
>>17735759
>>17735784
Fuck off that's not your (You)
>>17735770
God is neither real nor not real.
>>17735797
Atheists mad

Dont know, maybe basic education and less internet

>>17735801
>I mean mystical.

>>17733032
Evola maybe