/lit/ - Literature

>let's argue about the exact same thing again;

>>17710850
Sounds better than listening to rants from mulatto transgenders about how all white men are cis scum xenophobes

>>17710847
The idea in Calvinism is that humans can't humble themselves. The holy spirit humbles us. Our preaching and teaching is but a tool for providence to play out.

>>17710858
Is this some kind of dichotomy you've set up in your head? I don't see how the same dumb argument people have been having for literal centuries relates with the three ring idpol-circus you're implying is... what, this discussion's opportunity cost? I feel like I'm talking to a literal idiot.

>>17710858
Take your meds.

>>17710858
Is there a clearer sign of a healthy mind than this level of obsession with your opponent? Besides, for you to take the unfailingly self-destructive and long term crippling decision of self-defining by opposition, you first must self-define by attitude, as in, if you wish to self-define through opposition towards some political entity, you first must cement yourself as a political actor in the grand, or maybe even minor scheme of things. And to be honest, until you reach the significance of at least a proto-Ben Shapiro podcaster's sidekick, don't worry your mind with these obsessions.

>>17710911
>>17710918
What do you want to talk about? Why it’s a moral responsibility to insert things in your anus?

>>17710927
No. That's what I'm confused about. I have absolutely no desire to talk about that, and I don't understand why you do or how it relates to this thread.

>>17710938
I doubt he knows either, anon. It's the mark of a legitimate zealot: the categorical inability to look at any issue except as how it relates to "the cause."

>>17710938
Yes, because what would you like to talk about?

>>17710858
Obsessed

>>17710993
Congratulations on making an oomer meme TLDR.

>>17710960
Are you belittling the act of survival?

>>17711013
You want to turn this into a discussion on how well the internal logic of your zealotry justifies itself, and I have no interest in it. What are you hoping to accomplish by asking that question—whether or not I agree with you that the white race is under assault? It very well might be, but I don't participate in that intergroup clusterfuck. It's your continued insistence on trying to slither everything into an idpol shit-fling extravaganza that I'm trying to highlight here. I'm pretty sure that you'll take this as an invitation to justify why the white race's survival is in question, so I'm going to say right now that if you do, you have completely and utterly missed the point. It's this dynamic, in and of itself, which is objectionable to any of sound mind. It's present on every possible side of contemporary politics, and it's the actual big bad lurking behind the mask of the Other. I don't endorse strict adherence to the Marxist overtones of Debord, but the entire dynamic can be subsumed under the rubric of the Spectacle.

What I'm trying to say is that you're being manipulated by a machine beyond anyone's control, and instead of striking out at the machine itself, you allow yourself to be misdirected, and choose to strike out at other specto-drones fulfilling the same directive from the opposite end of the spectrum.

>>17711170
What are you doing here?

>>17711184
Same thing I've been doing here for the last fourteen years: trying to have good discussions with esoteric people.

If humans don't have free will how does anything God has ever done made any sense

>>17711284
How has anything God has ever done*

>>17711284
It has all been for his own glorification.

>>17711189
You’re not very productive in distilling your own personal verbal diatribes, are you? I feel you’re a victim of self.

>>17711320
Yet he loves us?