/lit/ - Literature

>>17508782
Twitter.

>>17508782
bro find a girlfriend

>>17508782
Discord. I remember briefly joining an accel shitpost server but I left it without speaking and I have never been able to find it again. It got posted on /lit/ though like a year ago or two.

i rarely see landposting these days. just make your frickin threads, cunt.

>>17508782
fuck you nobody cares

>believes in accelerationism
>can't hack it on an anime imageboard

ngmi, lad. you ought to be running the place.

>>17508833
I’m not sure if I believe in it, I want to do some more reading first

>>17508803
I cannot refute this

>>17508816
This. Land has been passe for a few years now. Which is a shame because I always enjoyed the acc stuff. I think the visceral prevalence of bioleninism and overall decline in human stock made the vision too preposterous. Not enough renegade scientists to bring about eldrtich capitalism AI when they have hoards of subhumans breaking their windows to make them hire trans POC in their HR department.

lol the ccru book from op is basically a joke. like, its meant to be. just read marx man, acc is basically marx with reversed normative commitments

>>17508967
acc is not Marx. It's only Marx if you consider Marx to be Marx by proxy of Deleuze, which is debatable.

>>17508782
Do not migrate. The landposting is amusing.

>>17508998
Land gets a lot of mileage out of Marx though.

So the other day guenonfag was saying the Vedas had no author as they were unwritten by man, but also denied that the Vedas wrote themselves, and someone likened that to Land's idea of Capital, and guenonfag said he didn't know what that was. You accfags aren't doing enough to maintain board culture.

>>17508876
>I want find a place to shit post so I can know if I should take it seriously
ówò

>>17508816
>>17508922
>>17509149
>>17509192

This. Land can only improve recent /lit/. I think we should discuss acc more, not less.

>>17509306
We can't. Every single thread is flooded by "accfag is a faggot" and niggers saying and taking seriously the whole 'AcCeLuRaTe da CoNtRudIcKtIoNs' shit.

>>17509330
How is that different than every other thread on any other topic?

>>17509342
this but unironically.

>>17508816
>>17508922
>>17509149
>>17509192
accfags are fucking based. acc threads from 18 and 19 were so fucking great which even gave birth to schizojak. but unfortunately now most of the accfags left and I don't even see the same quality anymore.

>>17509391
2021 is the comeback year. Let's drown out shitty Nietzsche threads and /pol/ zoomers with Landposting and schizo shit.

The problem I am finding is that there is so much necessary reading to be done before being able to discuss it. I cant imagine any serious acc-poster being much younger than mid twenties, unless he is jsut the edgy one book poster kind

>>17509391
>>17509416
Why not just keep it to one general acc thread?

>>17509291
This is the method of literary analysis /lit/ has taught me.

>>17509472
That's literally how I form beliefs now, I read something and if it seems interesting I start shilling for it here to see in which sort of ways I will be called a retard

>>17509465
that's not very accelerationist of you, bro

>>17509492
accelerationism has no praxis, thus one can not be 'very' accelerationist, one can only be driven by a process that cannot be stoped.

>>17509422
Land leans so heavily on Kant, Deleuze, Schopenhauer, and Nietzsche, (and Bataille) all of whom people already pretend to read, which makes discussing anything of Land nearly impossible since it's a few degrees of simulation. Consider what this passage means to /lit/:
>The existence of God would be an even greater disaster for him than for us. How infinitely trivial the crucifixion of Jesus appears besides the degrading torture of being God. After all, existence is so indistinguishable from defilement that one turns pale at the very thought of an eternal being's smell.
Is this based? Is it cringe? Is it true?

>>17509526
the virgin understanding accelerationism vs the chad hitting the gas pedal

>>17509547
Gonna add this quote to my "Land and Deleuze are crypto-gnostics" pile. There's an interesting parallel in Land's Kapital and the Demiurge, I think.

>>17509562
This is why people shouldn't discuss philosophy on an imageboard. Meme takes with no bases are allways accepted. Go and get hanged, nigger.

>>17509575
never

>>17508782
unironically Facebook groups

>"All of us want to work less." - #Accelerate: manifesto for an accelerationist Politics
This (combined with Negarestani's twitter) is why no one takes you people seriously. Land is fun for the edgyness but thats almost it.

>>17509600
that's L/acc a trend that died a while ago. Negarestani has placed himself far away from accelerationism.
Land is more than his book on Bataille and his work pre 2010.
You come to a acc thread knowing fuck all of acc.

>>17509617
You got me
I have only read some blog posts and the #accelerate book by that Avenessian and freind book.
But my point still stands. From the near outside it still looks pretty cringe.

>acc posting sent me down the rabbit-hole of Deleuze from which I have yet to emerge again
I'm not sure if it's a good thing but i'm still thankful for that.

>>17508922
Holy cringe. Look at this fucking samefagging.

>>17509871
who cares faggot?
go back to your guenon thread.

>>17509659
Big same amigo

>>17509659
cringe, give it a couple years. once you're out of the deleuze/shankara pipeline you might have something to contribute to philosophy besides reheated heracliteans

>>17509617
>Negarestani has placed himself far away from accelerationism.
What does believe now?

>>17510011
bunch of Hegel and Quine. Look for his book 'Intelligence and spirit'.

>>17509562
kek this is hilarious

>>17510035
As if Badiou and Meillassoux and Brassier and Gabriel weren't enough. What brings these recent continentals to analytic philosophy so often?