/lit/ - Literature

Faggot

>>17485152
>thinks this is attractive
Homosexuals are too desperate.

>>17485191
Why homosexuals? She's a woman.

>>17485211
It looks like the ugly smelly kid in the class. The makeup just makes him look gross now.

>>17485211
covered neck = hiding adam's apple

>Character vehemently hates X
>Secretly he actually loves X
i always wondered why certain people naturally do this, i feel like it's so easy to just like what you like and learn to deal with it

>>17485152
The embodiment of mental illness.

Ain't nobody can convince me that this person isn't in dire need of mental health services.

Imagine being the parents:

"What does your child do?"

"Oh, he decided he would become a woman and be a whore for a living."

"Oh, how wonderful."

>>17485238
I think it's just a mannish-faced woman. The collar isn't high enough to cover up an Adam's apple, unless that person's Adam's apple is located abnormally low.

>>17485152
i would rape Ella Hollywood if she was in my apartment. no, i'm not gay

>>17485247
There is literally nothing wrong with this.
>nooo why aren't you a slave to societally constructed gender and have a boring wageslave job like mine noo you can just do that you're mentally if you make choices!!!

>>17485259
>le social construct
Thats a tumblr meme with no basis in any psychologicsl research

>>17485259
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH

You fucking simp.

I guess there's nothing wrong with fucking 3-year olds either by your logic.

>>17485242
In the case of latent homosexuality, the person tries to deny their attractions because their family, peers and society are against homosexuality. But they tend to over compensate and get aggressively anti-homosexual. “Shadow self” I hear Jung called it.

>>17485390
I just can't comprehend how can you lose so much time on this board and still persist in being a fucking pseud tard

>>17485424
Take it up with Jung. It’s an actual tendency. Some “homophobes” are just trying to hide themselves
Much like anonymous hides.

>>17485449
Yeah, like a really tiny amount you retard. But you fags literally just have "oh yeah, guess you're a homosexual yourself!"

It's like these types of people are barely even conscious.

>>17485449
It exists but I often see this used to silence ANY valid criticism. Faggotry is peculiar at the very least and to point it out doesn’t make you a faggot.

>>17485390
Hm, this is a bit like how I pretend to hate stupid people but am actually a retard myself

>>17485467
It’s a favourite trope of fiction. That supposed to be what this thread is about
But it’s plainly for spiderfuckers like you

That is quite obviously a man.

>>17485490
No butters, you know perfectly well that this is a shitpost thread about the oft repeated "le ur secretly gay" insult, completely unrelated to /lit/erature.

>>17486473
She's a cute man though.

>>17485152
>>17485424
>>17485467
>>17486509
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/14430824_Is_Homophobia_Associated_with_Homosexual_Arousal

>>17486551
Nobody is more aware of how repulsive gays are than gays themselves, I don't know how this is even a question that needed study.

>>17486571
But non-homophobic straight men do not get aroused. Only homophobic ones. So all homophobes are fags. Ergo. you are a fag.

>>17486551
>>17486574
Lol cope, you're a homosexual bro.

Define "homophobe," what type of people actually did this testing, are both very important questions.

>>17486587
Huh? Yeah I'm homosexual. But so are you bitch.

hatred is just a form of adoration
simple as

>>17486625
>Homosexual scientists make bunk study
>guess your gay bro
Do you literally believe every person who dislikes homosexuals is a homosexual themselves?

>>17486642
Sorry bro, just the facts. Reals > feels.

>>17486640
>hating the homosexual mardi gras in the middle of your city means you adore it

>be AGP
>think trannies are abominations
>pity them rather than any hate
Is this ressentiment?

>>17486652
>everyone who dislikes homosexuals is gay
You're functionally retarded. I guess when women dislike them they're also gay in some way? Nevertheless you show you retard gay brain by not even considering the basic factors of the test, what exactly do they consider homophobic (a word neither adopted or created by people who dislike homosexuals), what sort of obvious biases could have been in the test through choosing participants, and the fact that you don't know these (probably not actually read the test) is obvious you're merely using it to justify your own nature.

>>17486689
>>17486660
A tired thought-terminating cliche is all homosexuals really offer as a defense anymore.

They already have full acceptance and same-sex marriage; there's no real excuse for them to push for "more". They are simply useful idiots for globohomo.

>>17486689
You seem upset. If offered, would you Take The Test™? Or are you scared of what they might find?

>>17486699
You mean the "see gay guys kissing and react to it like a bowl of writhing maggots" test? Yes, you are disgusting.

>>17486715
Anon, you must undo the Jewish programming that has infected your brain. It is okay to love males.

>>17486724
Yes, that's why Aristophanes hated mincing faggots and Romans became famous for fag-bashing.

>>17486728
Aristophanes was making fun of men who took it in the bum. In most cultures one's masculinity was determined by one's sexual role, not the sex of their partners. The neuroses of the 20th century "straight" is due to a very novel, very modern association of androphilia with effeminacy.

>>17486743
>Aristophanes was making fun of men who took it in the bum.

...yes, we call these people faggots.

>The neuroses of the 20th century "straight" is due to a very novel, very modern association of androphilia with effeminacy.

Or maybe there is a instinctual disgust in humanity to bash a faggot's brains in; or, at least throw them into the margins of society.
If there's one thing Islam is right about, it is the proper solution to the homosexual problem.

>>17486699
>you sound
Literally most midwit response possible. All of reddit whenever their views are challenged have these snarky "you sound a little annoyed there," and so on.

No anon, I wouldn't take a test where I have to see gay porn (which makes one wonder the type of man who says yes to these tests, again, such obvious bias you never think of), and to put it plainly for you anon, no, I know for certain that I would not be attracted to the homosexual, as the other anon pointed out I would be repulsed.

Another problem with these results is typical of these completely ridiculous far-strung neurological theories which arose in the latter half of the last century. Such completely new all-encompassing neurological frame of understanding, in which no one follows and only ever have for proof these lone tests which are as sparse as their information. To think that there wouldn't be one person who dislikes gays that wasn't sexually attracted to them here, it's logically just ridiculous.

Why must fags not just be content with their defected life?

>>17486766
>...yes, we call these people faggots.
Why are you obsessed with anal sex? You think about it more than I do. I do not care for it a whit.
>Or maybe there is a instinctual disgust in humanity to bash a faggot's brains in; or, at least throw them into the margins of society.
Stop projecting your mental illness onto the rest of the race.
>If there's one thing Islam is right about, it is the proper solution to the homosexual problem.
The Islamic world has one of the longest traditions of explicitly homoerotic poetry in the history of humanity - abruptly destroyed by the importation of Western slave moralism!