/lit/ - Literature

>>17394554
Didn't you read the blurb before you bought it? Retard.

>>17394554
For 300 pages of
>well maybe in the next chapter he'll stop writing like a complete twat
Other than that, you'll find out completely fascinating concepts and case studies that have the potential to revolutionize not only psychology and neurology, but also your daily life.

>>17394554

The furthest you can "naturalize" phenomenology without turning it into something completely different (and likely worthless).

>>17394572
But is naturalization the aim of phenomenology?

why do you keep making this thread. just read the book you lazy retard.

>>17394668

Of *a* part of phenomenology, sure. Genetic phenomenology requires some elucidation of the relation between natural facts and the natural attitude. Husserl himself did so in his analysis of passive and active synthesis.

bump

>>17394570
>Other than that, you'll find out completely fascinating concepts and case studies that have the potential to revolutionize not only psychology and neurology, but also your daily life.

really?

>>17394554
I keep telling you, this is literally it.

>>17395136
>really?

Yeah, he's kinda like a French William James but more interested in art and litterature.

>>17395600
what am i looking at here

>>17395890
Case studies on WW1 invalids and Gestalt psychology, which isn't necessarily what you'd expect coming at it from a philosophical background. There really should be a pic of something by Cezanne as well, because raving about Cezanne is 25% of the book.

>>17395614
nice thank you for the recomendation

>>17395600
"the visible and the invisible" is well represented by the middle panel though.

>>17396123
I haven't read that one yet. To be clear, I really enjoyed PoP and found it very insightful, although I wasn't expecting to read 200 pages on Kurt Koffka.

>>17394570
>fascinating concepts and case studies that have the potential to revolutionize not only psychology and neurology
it's not like it was written two years ago

Bump

I liked his argument against solipsism but on the whole the book filtered me because I'm too dumb to understand the writing style

Bump.

Bump.