/lit/ - Literature

Here is a philosophical metastudy work that i found by Brecker that covers the early threads pretty well:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1H2gXcdFbcUCsc9x3JEgKgSlBbc0RXOKC/view?usp=sharing

>>/lit/thread/S17258375
>>/lit/thread/S17285248
>>/lit/thread/S17313089

As always lads, feel free to ask me anything about Isaac Gorkoniker's family history.

>>17338653
This is the most undoubtedly, most absolutely based thing I have ever seen on this board. Good work anon. You've brought /hyperlit/ to the logical conclusion of its first chapter. /lit/ could use more people like you. Godspeed.

>>17338686
Okay so go ahead and read the Gorkoniker section from Brecker's Pseudae to make sure it aligns. Brecker may have taken liberties and i'm hoping somebody will refute him if he did.

Also picked up this gem over the weekend.
Definitely recommended reading.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13ll5uyQF4ISKFXqz64kVUZGMATtNS78h/view?usp=sharing

also
use this tool to generate prose for the Google Doc:
https://app.inferkit.com/demo
>https://app.inferkit.com/demo
https://app.inferkit.com/demo
>https://app.inferkit.com/demo

>>17338722
I read through it. It brought a tear to my eye to see my great-grandfather given such a glorious place in his book.

I feel bad to nitpick at Brecker's work because of this and honestly, his summarization is very accurate. There are a few hiccups, such as mistakenly taking me for Gorkoniker's grand nephew, but such things are almost not worth thinking about. The obituary Brecker quotes from is factually accurate in the events it gives, the dates are a bit off, but this is nothing to worry about and is no fault of Brecker's as concrete dates of Gorkoniker's exploits have never really been given before. I hope to address that in my upcoming book.

Again I'd like to thank Brecker for his work, it is truly masterful. I wouldn't hesitate to work with him if he offered.

>>17338819
i am desperately looking forward to the Gorkoniker biography. i'd like to summon Pugliesi scholars as well so I can expand on that. I plan to write a deconstruction of both Gorko and Pug after the Cranaesthetics googledoc is complete.

>>17338770
I out something in and I got pure gold

>Geoffrey Chaucer was an absolute glutton, he was as aware of this as any medieval French pimp - call it snobbery, call it anything, the guy absolutely loved potatoes and pork and anything his mother cooked in a casserole.

>In his work he had recipes like "potage de morue con croquette de foie gras de canard", not just soggy potato soup with lumps of pork fat in it, but actual real foie gras, frozen, in a kind of jar.

>His work is stuffed with food porn, with recipes for pork pies, hams, jam tarts and the like.

>So today we did the noble thing
Absolute kino.

>>17338819
also Brecker lurks so he'll appreciate your feedback.

>>17338871
Yes hello I am the foremost Pugliesi scholar in the western hemisphere.

>>17338878
dude its sweet.
dump your good ones into the google doc

also this one:
https://deepai.org/machine-learning-model/text-generator

>>17338653
Extremely based and hyperpilled
>>17338686
Brecker mentions Gorkoniker's ostrich. Surely there must be some documentation in Gorkoniker's Nachlass; a cargo manifest or perhaps receipts for bulk orders of birdseed, perhaps even a sketch of the famous avian.

>>17338986
absolutely.
i'd like to source some material from the engineers that constructed his aviary or even the ornithological understudies to his lecures.

these AI gennys are neat for making little parables.

>>/lit/thread/S17327817
There was some good discussion about Seaman in a recent thread
>the idea that the Sovereign sends gladiators into the future as a kind of hormesis to test would-be holders of imperium I can't even begin to wrap my head around. Is he saying something about the mortality rates of autocracy being a corrective feudalizing influence that necessitates the formation of exfamilial paternities? Maybe. Does he really like Gladiator? Absolutely
Has anyone else read Seaman's essay 'Cyberfeudal'? In real history Commodus isn't murdered by a general-turned gladiator who dies to leave behind a freer society, but Seaman seems to think that the Ridley Scott film is more than real. Despite Gladiator's appeals to republicanism, it actually capturing and dramatizing the process of feudalization as it chest-bursted through the Roman empire by means of mobile sovereignty-machines. Seaman thinks the 'real' Maximus was actually embodied not by the Hispano-Roman but the Visigothic, destroying the imperial flatline to replace it with the hieratic familiarity of the feudal-Oedipal.

>>17339130
You are a keen reader of Seaman and I can respect that. Yes that is essentially his argument, he even wrote a book about the way in which Odoacer was the father of the most sincere human age. He often seems to associate feudality with sincerity, though he does have designs on a post-sincerity sexual project.

>>17339130
Seaman is probably at the frontier of postpostmodern application regarding the sentience of concepts. I actually haven't finished Cyberfeudal yet.
While I was doing research for Prof Brecker's work, I found that there were a lot of decentralized Seaman works but few anthological volumes with which to amass a knowledge more concise than that afforded by crawling the archives for references to his texts.
Definitely suggest some Seaman, specifically his most groundbreaking or influential complete works.

>>17338986
>Surely there must be some documentation in Gorkoniker's Nachlass; a cargo manifest or perhaps receipts for bulk orders of birdseed, perhaps even a sketch of the famous avian

Who told you to say that?

>>17338641
what
why

2d or not 2d?

Posted this last thread, hope someone's interested this time. Picrel is a manuscript from Richeal de Monsqueno, a renaissance mathematician and philosopher. It's a critical look at narratives of falling, such as the fall from Eden and narratives of societal collapse. It is a look at how we take the fall from grace out of sequence, as he believes these events have great creative power for societies. He's almost like a mystical renaissance proto-Accelerationist, if you're into that sort of thing as well as renaissance mysticism I'd highly recommend this work.
>>17339167
I'm not the best person to ask, as we seem to have someone who is more well versed in Seaman than I am that has posted in these threads, but Thirst for Gratification is a must read. It's his seminal work on consciousness creation and linage romanticism.

So is this open for any of us to just add to Cranaesthetics?

>>17339194
>Secrets of the Headless
I'VE READ THIS!
Wow that's an obscure one. Heard about him through my Anthrogeonomy prof.
Mystical renaissance proto-Accelerationism was good in its day, real comfy stuff.
I'll see if I can dig up some passages.
>>17339194
Thirst for Gratification, right. I'll check it out.

>>17339236
It's a set of parables so far, I think that's what people are adding to at the moment. For lore and all that.

right now i'm using AI to generate a novel and a work of philosophy.

>>17339159
Yes, in his Beyond the Peninsular Principle he goes very deep into medieval Italian cases of exfamilial paternity, and the sincerity of the Ostrogothic breeding programme. The conclusion of that book is so unusual though; his argument that Justinian's Gothic War did not take place to me seems to make far too much of the blinding of Belisarius as symbol of the ephemerality of the Byzantine reconquest. The overall analysis is still quite solid, the futility of trying to erase feudal expressions of Sovereignty in the name of the imperial when the population has already been retroactively husbandized.

>>17339173
His papers are mentioned in Emilia Balgorskova's memoir. She claims to have been Gorkoniker's ex-wife.

>>17339236
Yes please add anything at all to that document.
Anything. At all. Thanks for your contribution.

>>17339298
Oh this I haven't heard of.
It's interesting that there is all this speculation regarding Gorko's romantic asseverations.

>>17339167
A lot of Seaman's longer works tend to be monographic studies that seem unrelated, but there is are two recurring themes of Sovereignty creating linear sexualities through an immanentized fedual socius and his more obscure Byzantium-denial. That said his contributions to theory tend to be 'adjuncts of schizo-feudal floatsam' as he puts it in his "How to Philosophize without a Rudder"

Bros, the guy who originally posted Adnil in the first thread might have gotten a fast one on us...
https://adnilarchive.wordpress.com/
>>17339250
Enjoy it, Seaman's prose is pretty good for such a stuffy philosopher.
>>17339268
>his argument that Justinian's Gothic War did not take place to me seems to make far too much of the blinding of Belisarius as symbol of the ephemerality of the Byzantine reconquest
It's like how Nietzsche saying God is dead was nonsensical to people at the time he said it, or like how Nick Land saying Techno-Capital created the conditions before it's own birth makes no sense to us now. Whether you take it literally or metaphorically, it should be analyzed symbolically more than anything else. Byzantium is an interesting look into reactionary proto-ironic currents in sexual structures according to seaman's framework, as it was almost a civilization created for dramatic theater more than a civilization form which theater arose. It was almost like the people in power were creating a society as a means of myth making rather than generating myths to justify a society. Like they Justinian knew of his legacy before it even came about.

>>17339354
This is pretty damning take from his Beyond the Peninsular Principle
>The very notion of a Byzantium, of a Roman Empire in a postgothic universe, where a Viking Security System is in place to put down riots 'caused' by chariot races, reveals the impotency of the imperial model vis a vis the feudal model of progenation. Everything we suppose to know about Byzantium underscores its precise lack of Sovereignty and it being little more as a state than the survival of psychosexual residues in a gas station bathroom. Indeed the last 'dynasty' of this anti-feudal imagination called itself 'Paleologus,' the old words! How fitting that the Turkish pasha-familias should destroy the curtain-walls of Byzantium with a thirty-foot phallus constructed by a mysterious Orban)Odovacer))Oedipus))).

I'm really fucking tired of the addictionaries shitting up this entire board, especially their circlejerk around Jacobs whole mind dilemma or whatever they go on about.
How can I btfo any addictionary in two sentences or less?

>>17339351
super heavy stuff.
brecker compares Seaman's anthroposexual metaphysics to Kapelstanel, i believe, who believed that corn was nearing sentience.
i'll have to expand on it for my paper, thanks for clarifying those topics.

>>17339453
Then she took one and offered it to Usha. Then she took one and offered it to Konda. Then she took one and offered it to Usha. Then she took one and offered it to Konda. Then she took one and offered it to Usha. Then she took one and offered it to Konda. Then she took one and offered it to Usha. Then she took one and offered it to Konda. Then she took one and offered it to Usha. Then she took one and offered it to Konda.

right there in Cranaesthetics my guy

>>17339453
Jacobs mind dilemma is midwit shit "oh bro so the onlh real truth is that ideology is an addiction bro the real truth is to go with the flow bro" is like a teenagers conception of Taoism. There's no reason to refute them, they refute themselves.

signing up with inferkit was the best thing to ever happen to me.
i'm going to publish 4 more books by the end of the night.

holy crap okay
go to https://app.inferkit.com/generate
use the tool to generate prose and philosophy.
once you run out of characters you can sign up with an email and get infinity more. i've got like three tabs open writing three different books rn.

>>17339412
Kek Seaman was the original "Istanbul not Constantinople" poster.

>>17339580
o nevermind i finally hit the limit.
kek. maybe Tor will help

Don't wanna fuck anything up; is there a protocol, a procedure to follow in the collab process?

>Gorkoniker
>Becker posters
>People unironically quoting Seaman
Why don't you people read some Xoel Botello's work before spewing such garbage.

>>17339896
More like Smelly Botello amirite boys

>>17339863
there is no procedure
if shit gets fucked up i think we can go back in time. google can do that.
>>17339896
actually this though. Botello is severely underregarded in /hyperlit/. clearly influenced by Edgum Husserl

>>17339714
also if you use Tor and yopmail addreses,
this lasts forever.

I have hit gold. I put in Nagarjuna and this pdf https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/25458/1004637.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y and got this: "
"The two most-defining characteristics of non-origination are that it is neither efficient nor perfect. It is an unsatisfactorily neutral state. It is non-origination.
As the cessation of the phenomenon of the shadow is the same as the cessation of
the mind-formation of this phenomenon, it is also called the self-righting of the
mind-formation of non-origination. Thus we may observe the object in the state of non-origination as non-self.
The object is an indefinable being. It is neither good nor evil. It is
undefined. It is an object that transcends both concepts. It is neither, it is not, it is not, it
is not, it is not, it is not.
If a specific variety of the object is called an “unreal,” then a particular
concept should be defined for it in accordance with the particularity of the object.
As all objects are in the case of non-origination, the object is not an ideal,
precise, or specific quality; it is an indefinite quality. It is an object which has no essence.
From its properties, it can be said that it is not an ideal object because there are no universal qualities attached to it. Thus there is no discrimination and all forms of phenomena share the same name. The object has no specific quality, no essential property, no ideal or idealistic quality. It is the state of non-origination. The object has no specific quality.
When this object is understood, the relation between cessation and objectivity has been clarified. If there is no inherent self, the cessation of suffering is an inquiry which could not be ascribed to a being, but to an object that simply doesn’t exist. The view is epistemologically opposed to the view that the object is the cessation of suffering. The object is an object that is its own non-origination, an object of inquiry."

Emilio Pagliani being an ex-fascist who criticized China african policy as "too reactionary" is a good example on the problems of over-education.

And leftist still praise his "disgruntled
nihilo-leninism" instead of reading Xi or Deng.
BAKA

>>17339983
kekkk whuttt
wow that's like real life /hyperlit/ in the wild.
we should catch it somehow.
maybe i should refute the fuck out of that guy.

>>17339930
/hyperlit/ doesn't appreciate the founders of neo-meta-philosophy. It's like praising Thomas Edison's work but hating Nikola Tesla.

As for Husserl influencing Botello, I've never been sold. There's clearly still debate on this issue with scholars regularly contradicting each other on the level of influence. They were both major contributors to the founding of neo-meta-philosophy but I am still in the camp that they were both grand minds coming to a similar conclusion via different means than anything.

>>17339983
>It is neither, it is not, it is not, it
is not, it is not, it is not.
Based sextalemma argumentation

>>17339896
>>17340009
>Botello
Completely refuted by Shivakumar in his Pragmatic Recapitulations. I don't see how anyone can shill for Botello with a straight face.

Keeping you all updated: I have put Meinon, Victor Cousin, and Graham Harman in. Behold:
"But for the purposes of analogy we will take for granted that we have an independent perceptual basis, not only in the awareness that something is in our field of vision, but also in the awareness that we are seeing it. If we were not even to perceive what is before us, but to see it only for its effects, this effect would remain ‘as yet unknown,’ which might lead us to say that the cause is ‘not yet known.’

This leaves us with the unsettling fact that it is this out-of-sight-out-of-mind aspect of objects which is the foundation of a ‘subject-object distinction.’ It is the effectual aspect of the given object that creates the difference between an object that is and is not as we perceive it, since only our perceptions really exist to the extent of how they relate to our actions. A rock in the sand, for example, is not an entity of its own, it is merely a surface, from which a force draws a straight line. It is the object’s actual cause, and it is the force which causes that line. In the case of a mind, on the other hand, which is a being for all intents and purposes, I am not only

the same being whether I am aware of my own identity or not, I am only myself as much as I am ‘the Other.’ I have been granted the power to be myself and the power to be that other being. And when I compare myself to other beings, there is no such thing as an absolute distinction; I see all of them as equally conscious, no matter what I might say to the contrary, and all others as equally other as I am myself. The fact that I can perceive myself as a being of myself does not mean that I am any less aware of myself as ‘the Other’ than I am of my own being; I am aware of the difference, but I can also believe that I am another being and that that other being exists in itself.

Not only that, but in the experience of this ultimate self-alienation, there is a corresponding self-alienation of my concepts and understanding of nature and beings. When I believe that there are such and such kinds of entities in the world, there really are such and such kinds of entities in the world, because I have been brought up to conceive of them as existing in the world as entities in the world, the same as myself, but I now perceive that such and such kinds of entities are not in the world, or not for me as such. For as soon as I become aware of being-such and such, I cease to be-such and such. A ‘thing’ is no longer something in the world, but something separate from the world, and it must henceforth be searched for in an abstract reality, outside of the universe as we understand it. By contrast, I am and I do not; I am this universe, and this universe is I."

the worst part is I actually agree with certain parts in this.

>>17340065
This is like a William James lecture fed through a machine gun

Okay Cranaesthetics is at about 12k words.
i guess i'll probably check that one out of the library pretty quick here.

>>17340031
>Shivakumar
The only people who read Shivakumar are post-transcendent hipsters. Please don't litter /hyperlit/ with this.

Our concepts (and it remains a mystery why this is the case) exclude the possibility of the paralogisms. As is proven in the ontological manuals, we can deduce that, in reference to ends, time excludes the possibility of, therefore, our a posteriori knowledge, but the ideal, so far as I know, is a representation of the manifold. By virtue of pure reason, as is evident upon close examination, the transcendental aesthetic may not contradict itself, but it is still possible that it may be in contradictions with the Antinomies. Because the architectonic of practical reason has lying before it our concepts; in all theoretical sciences, the Transcendental Deduction constitutes the whole content for the transcendental thoughts in space and time. It must not be supposed that the Ideal of human reason is just as necessary as the Categories; still, natural causes are just as necessary as the transcendental unity of apperception. Therefore it is within reason that Shivakumar is incorrect in his deduction of space-time philosophy.

>>17340009
>neo-meta-philosophy
Holy faggotry, read picrel. I think going like, three threads without shilling it also allows me to shill On the Anti-Form again, you fags need it.

>>17340146
>picrel
I bet you can barely quote the first chapter of any of his works.

>>17340119
Running Kant through an AI textbot does nothing to diminish Shivakumar's standing. 'Neo-meta-philosophy' is still neither new, nor meta, nor a philosophy; its categories are feverish scholastic revanchism; and its charlatan carnival barker Botello cites passages that don't even exist.

>>17340146
>>17340175
Scholz is notoriously difficult to digest. Brecker summarizes his adaptation of Pugliesi succinctly.

>>17340184
>AI textbot
don't break the 4th wall man

>>17340175
>I bet you can barely quote the first chapter of any of his works.
Why? I'm really into the Tauredian school, I constantly shill Pugliesi. It'd be more odd if I didn't read Scholz. He is a fucking dry writer though.
>>17340189
Sometimes the best introduction is bashing you over the head with the hard shit.

>>17340212
Not that guy but honestly I think we should break the 4th wall and act like it's just another part of the cannon to create the perfect chaotic environment. I mean half of the shit we've created has been due to a mistake, Najder is a Muslim because I mistake his last name for an Iranian one.

Is there a neo-anti-philosophy?

>>17340257
Nah but nothing exist until you larp it into existence hombre. That being said, fuck post-philosophy pseuds like Sandre Honjelvein and Kemlple Guddel, their autism knows no bounds.
>>17340238
mistook*

>>17340212
>>17340238
There's no reason why Cyberkant isn't a legitimate philosopher but if you think he refutes Shivakumar you are just coping.

ok, this is actually awe-inspiring:

Trump is not necessary. His actions are not necessary. They could have been undone by Lincoln's half a million. The great-name philosophers are not necessary. The great heroes are not necessary. The great thinkers are not necessary.

An important part of the emotional power of Trump's campaign has been his claim to self-determinism, that he can dictate outcomes in the United States. That is a noble self-goal, but a self-goal as a purpose, not as an outcome, a set of heuristics. Trump is but the self-determinism of certain minds. No one who has thought about politics long enough to adopt this attitude really believes that he can determine outcomes. Politics is always partial, like a discourse, like the movements of two balls, which have to take into account the fact that they move in opposite directions. Political actors seldom think like Aristotle did about the balance of Nature, and may very well give up on it if they are acting on the basis of that view of things. That is the lesson of the demise of the British Empire. That is the lesson of the collapse of the Ottomans. That is the lesson of the succession of empires since the First World War. Many people believed that Britain would have been safe if it had rejected the European Entente. That is because they believed that the British Empire was safe; they did not know that it was not, and did not know that the order of the universe is relative.

This does not mean that others should not believe, for there is a fundamental tendency to act in self-interest. It means that a politician has to work hard to not be a fool. Being a fool does not require self-knowledge; stupidity is something that people do not recognize as such. Trump is perfectly able to learn about and exercise self-control, just as he can at any time lift his arm to raise it. That does not mean that he has to act like a normal human being. That is not in his nature.

>>17340326
Actually Cyberkant is more relevant now than ever. Please train some AI to write an essay about this.

>>17340326
Oh he wasn't breaking the 4th wall, interesting idea.

Anyways give me the rundown on Shivakumar anon, I haven't heard of him. I've been seeing a lot of Indian philosophers get mentioned around here that I didn't know beforehand. Wish there was a anthology of their works...

my AI (Husserl) is finally bringing up jews organically. so stoked.

fucking dying here


The words ‘‘aûlò’’ and ‘‘unduá’’ serve as a label for a percept which is independent of, and quite independent of the sensorium of the subject or persons paying attention to it. There is no possibility that it may simply be associated with a perceptual experience, for what seems to me quite clear is that what it represents is different from the percept that results from the contents of any one sense or sensorial faculty. It is called unduá (‘‘unseen’’) for the fact that it is not ‘‘seen’’ by a person who has been in a state of paying attention to the display. The word is opposed to, or is an analogous synonym of, ‘‘aûlò’’ (‘‘seen’’). How ‘‘unduá’’ relates to ‘‘aûlò’’ is one of the matters that has been discussed extensively in this colloquium and by the participants. To illustrate my point, let me draw attention to two passages in Peter V. Siderits:

I almost lost my mind when I had a lucid dream in which I was transported to the Maraleen mines of Australia, where I discovered a gold vein right beneath my feet. The sensation of self‐location was so powerful that I got up and went to investigate what was the matter. [F1] In another dream, I returned to the Zwartburg Estate in a dreamscape where I had previously experienced it as a refuge from a totalitarian world. The problem at that time was ‘‘to destroy it without a mess.’’ [F2]

I found myself back in that cottage, a foreigner (on my way to a secret work site) who is prevented from staying at the cottage for long because of its eerie stench. I know that the ocean in the dream must have lapped at my feet. I can imagine the ghostly message it carried.

And:

In the waking state, one might be assured that all this is nonsense, but it was very real for me during that vision. [F3] [Peter Siderits, Ken Wilber: Conversations on the Path, New York: Palgrave, 2011, p. 62]

As one of the participants in the colloquium put it, ‘‘if there is anything that is not a function of perception it is… [e]verything that does not happen to us and is not explained by our direct sense experience… [‘‘aìmã’’].’’

What does ‘‘aûlò’’ have to do with vipassana practice? Here it is worth drawing attention to the two kinds of material present in the suttas on vipassana.

publishing a novel by Husserl right now.
guess i'll wait until the thread dies to publish the Cervillissimo work.

OKAY
Updated the official canon of works with pic related. Please submit your books, or otherwise publish them and provide links so we can organize them all.
https://lampbylit.com/magazine/hyperlit/
>https://lampbylit.com/magazine/hyperlit/
https://lampbylit.com/magazine/hyperlit/
>https://lampbylit.com/magazine/hyperlit/
https://lampbylit.com/magazine/hyperlit/
>https://lampbylit.com/magazine/hyperlit/

>>17341138
I discovered that work of Husserl's completely with https://app.inferkit.com.. 10,000 words.
It's better than F Gardner.

>>17341138
download the PDF
https://lampbylit.com/magazine/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Cynosure.pdf

CRANAESTHETICS IS COMPLETE.
NEW OPEN ENDED COLLABORATIVE BOOK:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/190wJaYMypeFpEQL1K-EXSIeF-dMfwnKzh46m_kvVzjM/edit?usp=sharing

>>17341255
Very based but I can only see on page of it for some reason.

>>17341264
there's only a single page right now.
i'm just preparing the Cervillissimo text for publication. i'll leave the new one out there and see what comes of it.

And there we go.
Well done /lit/.
https://lampbylit.com/magazine/cranaesthetix/

>>17341492
Godspeed anon, this stuff is better than anything else /lit/ has created for a while (other than the zine).

Oddly Disjointed for a Cervelellossimo work. Do y’all think he has become conscientious due to McDajjii calling him a “Patapatapataptataphysical one-trick pony”?

>>17341537
its gonna be big i think. i'm just going to keep building and building.
working on reading up and finding some literature on pic related

>>17341543
It's by far Cerv's most abstract thesis.
not necessarily his sharpest. he didn't even bother to prerefute his detractors, soo.. yeah.
Cerv was influenced a lot by Cieszkiewicz and even Amirault in a lot of ways on Cranaesthetics.

>>17341585
He is clearly just subverting Amirault. Amirault does not even believe in the cranium, as you well know.

Gentlemen, how do we feel about the problem of First Appearance? Has a tenable solution been reached by anyone yet? I'm quite fond of Surrey's way of justifying it foreologically but I'm not sure how rigorous that argument really is.

>>17341612
First Appearance, because it's happening right now, is difficult to grasp homeomorphically.
because /hyperlit/ is growing so fast, it makes the likelihood of a Second Appearance less so.
still there is an argument for Surrey's foreologics; from what i've read (which isn't much), his bibliographic citations are near perfect.

>>17338686
were you aware of Gorkoniker's Talmudic flair? I found an excerpt of an obscure lecture of his:
One of the followers asks, ‘O Rabbi, where did you get the power to know the future?’ Rabbi Chaim replies, ‘I have learned the future from a stone.’

One of the students seems to have the opportunity to bring one of the holy vessels, which was used for carrying water from the spring, as one of his daily tasks. But, when he is on his way to carry water to Rabbi Chaim, he learns the future – and turns back. Rabbi Chaim then tells him to make a pilgrimage to Ein Gedi, and there he will see what he missed. So he returns to Ein Gedi, and finds that Rabbi Chaim has been arrested for his sermons, and has been imprisoned. So he takes the sacred vessels, and runs off, hiding in the desert for years. He then returns to Rabbi Chaim, asking him where he can find water.

And then he says, ‘Your confession. You made me put a bowl of salt water on the place where the water is running to, and you wanted me to watch you commit adultery with it.’ And he said to him, ‘Yes, I did that, and there is no remedy for that crime.’
Rabbi Chaim replies, ‘There is a remedy for adultery, but it is a crime, and you have committed it.’

And he says to him, ‘You have told me to be a wine-sodden priest who brays for his own voice, and ask for fornication and even for myself!’ And he said to him, ‘For yourself, to what point? Do you mean that when you speak to God, or anyone in the world, you speak in a manner that would make them ashamed to talk to God?’ And he said, ‘Not in that case. When you refer to others, you address God by God’s name, and it is a divine manner of speech.’

Rabbi Chaim said to him, ‘Then, O my son, you speak God’s words, but they are an adulterous talk.’

The student said, ‘Well, then, I shall go back and speak in God’s language, and I shall speak to God in that way, and I shall take the water from the spring of God’s love.’

And then, he threw a stone at Rabbi Chaim, and struck him on the forehead, as he had done the first time, and the bowl of water fell from the hands of Rabbi Chaim, and the cup of wine flew out. And he ran off with the cup, as he had done on the second day.

Rabbi Chaim, seeing that the stone had struck him, grew angry, and thoug that now the water in the bowl was free for other uses. So he reached out to grab it, and the cup, which had been full of wine, fell on the ground, spilling it out, to the disgust of the Jews. They said to him, ‘Why, the heavenly Jews – the teachers of the Bible – have sung about water. And the water has fallen from your hands, and now there is no water for your Rabbi. And now your Rabbi has become a nonentity.’
And the people of the synagogue were also angered. So Rabbi Chaim wrote a terrible book in their language, and, when he was done writing, he was eaten by a tiger.
(The believers are destroyed, and the non-believers remain.)

>>17339193
3d>2d>1d

>>17340326
>>17340344
CYBERKANT
>CYBERKANT
https://lampbylit.com/magazine/cyberkant/

bump

>>17341996
What the fuck..

>>17341255
>>17341255
>>17341255
>>17341255
>>17341255
>C H E C K E D
Dig the Google Doc Boys she's pretttttty sweet.

>>17341748
Go to bed, Kirkbride.

>>17338641

I have a serious question, not a part of the faux discussion : is this going to be published like Coronameron, Lanomie and the like? Also do we have to submit pieces or is it all being complied from past threads?

>>17342492
i am slowly publishing all of these books in paperback through Amazon Kindle:
https://lampbylit.com/magazine/hyperlit/

The idea as always is that anyone can download the book and print it themselves. The one that is live right now is pretty sick too.
i'll probably make a thread later today with the express purpose of getting /lit/ to use AI to write a Great Work™ of pseudophilosophy.

bump

And another one.
https://lampbylit.com/magazine/ruminations

>>17343213
Are you writing these for real or are you mostly generating them.

>>17343243
I wrote PSEUDÆ. i studied the original threads to get everything right for that one.
Creanaesthetics, Ruminations, and Bijectivity are highly collaborative so there may be a mix of random stuff. Cyberkant is generated,
of course there's sa little artistic license in each of them.

i generated the passages for Cynosure Willing and curated my favorite ones and built a novella.

>>17343277
Ah I see, I was worried you would only generate them and edit it a bit, I'm glad you're using a variety of methods. Godbless anon.

>>17343290
Once the space is populated a bit hopefully anons will take their time and drop some quality works. i also want to put together really big /lit/ collab philosophy book in the next couple of weeks.

loading the last one onto paper back.

>>17343901
beginner-tier hyperlit shelf

>>17343901
Hoping to make the On the Anti-Form cover since I'm the 'tist who shills it.

>>17343937
yeahh do it up. was waiting for the Pug scholar.
wanted to get /lit/ to make a large collab magnum opus soon. was wondering if maybe a Pugliesi work would be a good choice for research.

>>17338641
This fucking board always shits on everything even remotely "post-modern" but every time you try and write something together it's the most fragmented, post-modern, post-structural jibberish anyone could ever imagine, far worse than any of the published authors that are regularly berated on here.

>>17343971
actually Hoex' Cynosure Willing is largely guided simulated intelligence yet it manages to outshine F Gardner by most technical criteria. seriously check it out:
https://lampbylit.com/magazine/cynosure-willing/

Will /lit/ ever surpass itself after this? The amount of creativity flowing these past couple weeks is unprecedented. All these years I thought /lit/ was declining, little did I know we were peaking.

i'm working on this one rn

https://docs.google.com/document/d/15aoCMVi0Wd7y6wADVeIeofZxL3ZekJaQQzuBKPvs5W0/edit?usp=sharing
>https://docs.google.com/document/d/15aoCMVi0Wd7y6wADVeIeofZxL3ZekJaQQzuBKPvs5W0/edit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/document/d/15aoCMVi0Wd7y6wADVeIeofZxL3ZekJaQQzuBKPvs5W0/edit?usp=sharing
>https://docs.google.com/document/d/15aoCMVi0Wd7y6wADVeIeofZxL3ZekJaQQzuBKPvs5W0/edit?usp=sharing

>>17344003
I wouldn't go that far, though I really have enjoyed this whole ordeal a lot.

>>17344003
yeah its wild. i've been really productive.
i have vision of a bunch of us generating works prolifically and saturating this space with all this insane content that hopefully all ties into itself.

>>17338641
So this is a Diogenes thread?

go here to generate AI.
Drop some Kant or McCarthy or what you want inside the seed box and watch it write prose/philosophy.
when you run out of characters, use a free yopmail.com email address. super easy.
https://app.inferkit.com/generate

>>17338641
Why has nobody realized that Bosch's Bijectivity is LITERALLY just a rip off of Pirral & Dunne's Bijectivity on Forms?
All refutations to P&D's BOF have been BTFO'd since the 80's by Knockner's X-jectiv Manifesto before he got arrested by Bosch-fags in the police.

>>17344082
Brecker covers that in Pseudæ.
He probably quoted you making your argument.

>>17344104
Brecker is literally a pedophobe. I don't trust anything he says, such a reactionary.

>>17344148

>>17344148
kek.
he certainly defended several convicted ephebophiles in the introductions to their memiors but i doubt he engaged in such reprehensible, specifically UN-academic pursuits of the car-natal Flesch.

okay guys finish this play i started
i'm going to bed:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/15aoCMVi0Wd7y6wADVeIeofZxL3ZekJaQQzuBKPvs5W0/edit?usp=sharing