/lit/ - Literature

>>17299774
We can't keep meeting like this :(
We need a dedicated board for this kind of stuff.

>>17299785
True, but until we get one this is the board with the highest number of anons that have some geniune artistic interests, and we can try to center the discussion around books which is not that bad.

>>17299800
I understand, a shame though.
Well, anyway, in terms of art related books, I'm really interested in Giorgio Vasari's Lives of the Most Excellent Painters, Sculptors, and Architects.
Google has a free version of the book and I can probably find other copies of it elsewhere so I definitely have no excuse to not read it. I can't speak Italian though so I'll have to rely on English translations. Might buy a physical copy too.

Have any anons read this book? Was it good? Does it have "personality" like Herodotus' Histories or is it dry?

>Pieter Bruegel the Elder
Name a more B A S E D painter than this, I'll wait...

>>17299893
I have had it in my list for quite a while too, I would expect it to be quite dry knowing the time, but have heard it is an esesential read, so maybe it's more engaging than I think.

>>17299928
That's such a wonderful painting. Last year I could visit the Prado Museum during an exposition dedicated to this piece.
The dignity and firmness of the men about to be shot is really striking when you look at it next to the executions of the 3 of May of Goya.
I find it to be a wonderful reminder of how costly the liberties we take for granted now truly were, and how indebted we are to the brave people who made this world a better place in our sake.

>>17299774
>>17299800
there are plenty of art boards you fucking retards. the only thing is you want to larp as le cultured smarty pants lit faggots.
>>>/ic/
>>>/p/
>>>/tv/
>>>/mu/
>>>/po/

>>17299966
None of those boards is dedicated to the intellectual discussion of the fine arts. Besides, literatrue is an art too.
I will probably space the genreals more, like once a week. And if it doesn't work I will maybe move to /p/.

>>17299966
>999
>66
W A I S T E D
Fuck you, you fucking retard
/his/ and /lit/ are the closest we have to an intellectual board devoted to discussing art.
/ic/ is user produced art, and while that's cool, it's all anime, porn, and shit lol.
/p/ is photography and is better in terms of user produced art but not necessarily cultured.
/mu/ is pretty good but too far away from what we're talking about.
/tv/ is retarded.
/po/ is about fucking origami lol.

szapocznikow

>>17300008
>W A S T E D
whatever.

>>17300010
Holy shit, what am I looking at.
This shit is so ugly.

where can i find HD art images

>>17300015
Oh, it's made by some /pol/ack girl.
Eh, I would probably shag her for a night in her prime.

>>17300022
Most museums have uploaded hd images of their whole catalogue, or at least the most important pieces.
https://www.nga.gov/collection/highlights.html
https://www.artic.edu/collection?q=
https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search#!?searchField=All&showOnly=openAccess&sortBy=relevance&offset=0&pageSize=0
https://www.hermitagemuseum.org/wps/portal/hermitage/explore/artworks/?lng=ru
https://www.museodelprado.es/en/the-collection
https://www.louvre.fr/en/moteur-de-recherche-oeuvres

>>17299774
so on top of religion and philosophy we now have to have art as well? Literature will not have a chance if this catches on, /lit/ will be everything but literature. Fuck you OP.

>>17300062
I will give you a tip:
1. Open the catalogue
2. Right click on this general
3. Press hide
There you have it, no more art discussion on /lit/.

>>17299893
I've read large part of it for my university course. It's can be pretty dry, but it's still worth reading as Vasari sets up many of the conventions we still use in art History today e.g. dividing the Renaissance into three.

>>17300090
I know how to hide threads. Are you sure you are smart enough to discuss art? You seemed to have missed the point of my post.

Also, why would I manually hide something that is supposedly going to be a regular feature, that is what filters are for. Are you sure you are smart enough to discuss art?

bontecou

another bontecou

For me, it's Masaccio

>>17300112

the chad de kooning

tfw no manic hungarian fig-abstractionist painter gf

de kooning in bronze (the clam digger)

>>17300062
lol, you want /lit/ to just be about stories and shit?
Maybe if we had at least two dozen more boards that would be a viable option but as it stands you sound like a brainlet.

Philosophy and Theology/Religion have produced some of the most interesting and most readable books to ever exist. It's no wonder why people would rather discuss A Critique of Pure Reason than, say, Robinson Crusoe.
Kant's philosophy has more to offer than any simple story.

greenaway (also a noted filmmaker)

bellmer (c. 1937)

boccioni

>>17300141
Are you stupid? I did not say philosophy and theology should be removed from /lit/, I said if another subject pops up there will be no lit on /lit/.

You sure act stupid for someone who pretends to be smart.

arp

lam

>>17300133
This is so fucking ugly.
If you want to see a better version of this shit just look at any landform or rock formation, lol.

>>17300161
How does a general dilutes the overall discussion on a board?
If anything it contains many off topic discussions and keeps the board cleaner.
Everyone talking about /p/, /po/ or /ic/ either hasn't even clicked on those boards or doesn't give a fuck about the intellectual discussion of art, which is inextricably linked to literature by the way.
I don't give a fuck about fantasy, so I never click in the sffg, there, problem solved.

noguchi

>>17300177
unbelievably filtered

>>17299774
>posting the virgin heroic reimagination of Laocoon instead of the based, terrored original

bourgeois

paul thek

>>17300179
How are you going to contain the discussion in a general? When some anon wants to talk about his favorite artist and everyone in the general ignores him, are you going to hunt him down and kill him when he starts his own thread about his favorite artist?

A philosophy general or a bible general would make the board cleaner, we have lots of random threads on those topics. We do not have a glut of art threads cluttering the board for a general to clear up.

Do you always just assume everyone else has no clue? It really makes you look kind of stupid.

>>17300182
Some Retard
>Ass Is In The Way
>Move My Day Okay
>What Are We When
>We Lose All Sense?
Me
>What the fuck are you saying retard, lol.
You (some pseud pretending he understands the Retard)
>fi...fi...filtered.

marisa merz

>>17299978
I do agree with you that most of the discussions on those boards are trash. But if you will make a sincere thread then you will definitely get responses.
If you want to make a weekly thread on /p/ or /lit/ then you have to advertise it on other art boards to build a "patrician" community.
I would suggest you to make this thread on /p/ because it is a slower board and more close to visual arts.

Few good threads:
>>>/tv/145166970
>>>/mu/100939709

/ic/ have few very knowledgeable artfags
/fa/ architecture anons on /fa/ are cool
/p/ have few very autistic art photography fags

>>17300008
This board is for literature and not visual art. Good luck on finding more than 6 "intellectualllz" on /lit/ who know about anything other than "Wanderer above the Sea of Fog".
Have a (You) "le me cultured and other plebs" fucking cunt.

nam june paik

>>17300195
i know what i’m talking about, fren. just humbly posting sculpture i like as per OP’s request. hbu?

asawa

>>17300193
I have seen plenty of posts like post painting get a book rec, music for reading, discussions on books about Gombrich or other art histories, John Berger and the like.
All I want is a dedicated art board, as long as everything we have is /ic/ then this general can serve as an alternative.
Your fixation on intellegence suggests you are not as bright as you may think.

mrinalini mukherjee

i saw her show last year, it was incredible.

ursuta

bertlmann

>>17300203
Holy seethe.

>>17300219
>>17300230
>>17300236
Stop posting this meaningless shit.
At least write some description about these pieces or some shit.

nauman

The closest thing I came to art was fucking two chicks making out between their mouths while we all fingered pussies and I would go between both of them to give them oral. I didn't want to cum

another thek

charles ray.

and that concludes our sculpture tour for now.

>>17300011
Nice dubs man

>>17300215
It is difficult to not question the intelligence of someone who fails to address any of the points made and acts like they are dealing with a moron.

Post a pic and get a book rec maybe a low quality thread, but it is on topic, unlike this.

Auguste Rodin l ART.
Good book

>>17300320
you know that almost all of rodin’s work was made by a woman, right? he just took the credit from camille claudel

>>17300320
Any book about Velasquez ?

Is this thread literally just "WE SMART SO WE COME HERE AND NOT /TV/ HAHA". What even is the point?

>>17300330
No way ?!?!
I don't believe it she is good but not as good as rodin

>>17300340
Any book about Rembrandt?
By the way i don't give a shit about what people think of him I want to hear his words same for Velasquez

>>17300344
this is for general art discussion and not just films

>>17300258
Why are you only posting women? Nothing against it, just curious.

>>17300359
Why here? It's extremely cringy what you're doing by trying to seem serious. There's like >>>/ic/ ? /lit/ isn't even a serious board, we just read.

>>17300361
i like women artists but paul thek is not one

>>17299893

I didn't find it dry at all. Vasari is pretty entertaining.

>>17300330
You lying nigger.
This whore did not do most of Rodin's work.
Rodin literally founded the style she worked in. She literally studied under a colleague of Rodin.
At most, she was his muse, worked in his shop, and inspired some of his own artwork.
You dumb fuck.

>>17300367
Yeah, should have replied to some other post.
But almost all the ones you posted are women.

I had not heard of them. Some are quite interesting. What book (or website) on contemporary sculpture do you recommend? I know very little about it, though it interests me.

>>17300356

>muh secret community

If you like Odilon Redon's paintings I recommend reading his collected diaries desu. The man probably suffered from some kind of autismo, but still a really comfy read.
Here's a quote:
"A painter is not intellectual when having painted a nude woman, he leaves in our minds the idea that she is going to get dressed again right away"

go to >>>/ic/ please and thanks.

>>17300359
sneed

>>17300422
art!!!!!!11!!

>>17299962
Cranach the Elder

>>17300385
I guessed so.
She is not better than rodin. But still good.
I realy like some of what she did

>>17300401
Based I have a book from him.
What does it mean to be an artist.
Will read it

Enter

If I kill myself at my poetry reading tomorrow, would that be high performance art? Would I live forever in the canon of art history?

>>17300430

>>17300466
Yes gurl! ART!!!!!

WE'RE IN HAVOC! THE SEEEECRET COMMUNITY ON THE MAINSTREAM WEBSITE IS GETTING DESTROYEEEEED!

>>17300466
Only if the poetry is actually good. Otherwise you will just come off as a confused goofus.

>>17300502
Who made that? It looks quite interesting.

>>17300510
http://strandsofbeads.blogspot.com/2008/07/bead-and-jewelry-link-love.html?m=1

>>17300466
You will be remembered as the next Alfonsina Storni and 50 years from now artsy songwriters will sing about you.

>>17300505
It is good and I know it. And I am severely, cripplingly depressed. Contemplating keeping a loaded gun offscreen when I give my zoom reading, and then doing the deed as the final curt. It would be epic.

>>17300466
Depends on your city and the color of your skin.

>>17300502
amazing abstract art

>>17300502
Kind of reminds me of Jackson Pollock. Artist name? Looks fantastic.

>>17299774
>tfw can't explain art without using literature

>>17300502
The purple on the right side is quite nice, especially the transition.

>>17300517
I understand valueing a work of art higher than a human life.
But honestly, don't. Write a story about a guy who would have commited suicide after an art reading instead. It seems you have a vague plot already set out in your mind. Please do that rather than actually offing yourself, it would probably make for a much more interesting piece of art. And if it's not, atleast you live on to make better art and move on to other works.

If you're just here to post visual art doesn't /ic/ make more sense?

>>17300502
this is timeless art which represent the whole earth. look at those colliding strands of different energies exercising their Schopenhauerian Will. This is the true of human nature, 10/10.

>>17300502
the bold yellow strokes really show a strong and emotional response

>>17300525
BROOOOOO ART!! IN THE BIG MAN BOARD! IM IN THE BIG BOY BOARD!! MOMMMMMMMYYYYY
>>17300535
shut up we take our art very seriously. You wouldn't understand because you're a stupid small man hahhaa. we'r ebig. you're small. we're big. you're small. we're big. you're small. Hehehe!

>>17300466
You should try it, if it doesn't work nothing of value will be lost anyways.

>>17300502
Holy shit. Who made this. It's quite beautiful in a way. Nietzshcian. Kieerkegaardian. Thank you /art/!!!

>>17300502
Breathtaking. Inspring.

>>17300502
pure talent encapsulated into one image.

>>17300502
could work on it a bit more, possible add some bright red

>>17300584
the fact that it has no red is what gives it it's essence, shut the fuck up retard. It's amazing the way it is.

>>17300502
This photograph mogs every single trash photograph itt.

>>17300502
/art/ is such an amazing general!!! this is so beautiful, I can't explain it! Without this thread I would never have found this.

>>17300536
KEK

>>17300585
ah fuck man im sorry, im just an armature seeking for divine skills which i can research and put onto mine

>>17300603
Exactly, maybe take a closer look at how the exclusion of red represents the Jordan Petersonarian nature of life?

>>17300610
i can see that i can't reach such exquisite levels of that artist, i must lay my hands down and really study the nature and the beautiful concept of what he has made

>>17300619
You should start by cleaning your room. Jordan Petersonian art 4 life !!!

>>17300502
AAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO I AM FUCKING SHAKING BROS I WILL BE NEVER THIS GOOOOOOD GOOOOOOODBYE CRUEL OP FOR MAKING THIS HIGHLY ARTISTIC THREAD AND MOGING ME THE FUCK OUT NOW MY ART CAREER REEEEEEE

>>17300631
Mogged by Jordan Petersonian art.

>>17300631
>>17300593
>>17300587
>>17300584
>>17300575
>>17300567
>>17300553
>>17300539
>>17300536
>>17300533
>>17300524
>>17300520
>>17300510
niggers

>>17300637
>the fact that it isn't even a samefag

>>17300637
reminder that only three of those are me

>>17300637
now imagine how many of them are the same person. It's probably all the same guy. Fucking retards.

>>17300502
OMG LOL modern art debunked boyz. Gottem amirite!!!
Reddit wins again friendos!!!

Hi, I’m here from /p/
Nice threat you have here. It’s a very good idea. I’m more into painting than contemporary art ( I have a uncle that has a gallery and i got ptsd from some of the works there as a kid, like a huge jeff koons where he fucks his wife analy).
I’ll do a dump about swiss painters in a few days.

>>17300637
reminder.
>>17300652
leave our board alone, sounds like nobody wants you here. fucking "/art/".

>>17300230
Looks like a Portuguese Man-o-War

Wow, even more on top of philosophy and "god is not real/god is real" threads. Great idea, just ruin it for the rest of us in the name of art.

>>17300637
jokes on you only 4 of those are me.

>>17300230
Looks like space shit

Any feminist art?

>>17300690
the banan has risen to another level, now this is what i call a bold bright art, fuck you faggots who disagree

>>17300700
Creation of Adam but better. All I could really find that was good.

>>17300690

>>17300702
I'm all for conceptual art, but Cattelan should be inmediatly disregarded as the hack he is.

>>17300724
shut up kid. The Banana is already ascended while you are in the sewer with rats.

Go to >>>/x/

Genuinely posting on the film general in >>>/p/ seems like a better idea for you. It will get you closer to your goals at least and it's much more related. Who the fuck decided to add this thread here?

Uh is this the right thread?

>>17300787
Of course

>>17299966
>None of those boards is dedicated to the intellectual discussion of the fine arts
>>17299966 is right stop larping as cultured faggots

>>17300010
>>17300120
>>17300133
This tranny samefaggot will ruin every thread

>>17300644
It is he was samefagging the last thread with the same degenerate shit. Probably 60 posts

Jordan Wolfson

>>17299785
>>>/art/
Go back

>>17300502
This is great art, the real problem is capitalism boys

>>17300149
Looks like Dali's Baked Beans thing
>>17300154
Based Boccioni. I totally unexpectedly ran across a treasure trove of his stuff in the Peggy Guggenheim museum in Venice. They had a cast of this and several other works, both sculpture and painting.

>>17300200
Is that a triptych? I like the third one.

Every post in this thread is modern art or people complaining about modern art.
If you don't like it you can post something you think is better

>>17301453
>I'm a tranny and will shit on everything
>if you don't like it post something so I can drown it in shit too

>>17301453
Yes based finally

>>17301453
It would be wonderful to have a balanced discussion between classical art and more modern or experimental pieces.

>>17300466
Given enough fame beforehand yes, otherwise you'll be an internet meme with a small Wikipedia page but a larger Know Your Meme page.
I forget the name but there was a performance artist who had a friend shoot him with a real gun in a gallery which achieved some notoriety.

leave our board to >>>/p/ pls. you aren't cultured

>>17301757
Uncultured hands wrote this post.

>>17299963
b2r

greetings from /p/. I'm honestly not sure this thread would work on /p/. too many gearfags and I'd say in general not a lot of people actually interested in the actual artistic aspects of photography. I'd like to be proven wrong tho.

Anyone have some lit to recommend regarding contemporary theory?

>>17302101
correct, this general belongs here, hate it as you may,,, (you can easily hide it, as i always have like 50 active threads hidden at any given time.)

>>17302101
cool story. Honestly then they need to leave us and go to >>>/ic/. I suggest p so they can discuss the technological aspects too, while keeping the artistic side on ic. I dont fuckijg know I dont care about movies.

>>17302159
It doesnt belong here, we don't give a fuck. I don't understand who you imagine us as. It's called literature dude.

>>17302107
Depends on which level you want them, entry or more advanced?
Some good ones you can check out:
Bauman's essay liquid art.
Adorno's aesthetic theory.
The Aesthetic Unconscious, The Politics of Aesthetics and Aisthesis: Scenes from the Aesthetic Regime of Art by Ranciére.
The Sovereignty of Art by Menke.
Languages on Art by Goodman.
And maybe the most basic of all, Ways of Seeing by Berger, for absolute beginners on art theory.

>>17302168
Literature is one of the high arts, it's really common for someone having an interest in one artform to have atleast some kind on interest in other ones as well.
I would say people who come here willing to discuss Turguenev will have a higher chance of being interested in the arts than those drawing hentai on /ic/.

Jean-Luc Moulène

I know nothing about sculpturing since I've never done it, but is there any I could do in my kinda small home? I could have a room I dedicate to it but I dont know how expensive and how much material I need.

Are there any books for absolute retards like me that want to get into sculpturing?

Boxer at rest.
Hellenistic period.

>>17302598
I have never sculpted, but what I know is that you should start with something cheap and reusable, like clay, mud or maybe woodcarving. So try to look up some beginner manual on those materials first.

>>17299774
Don't stop making this threads, anon. Honestly.
They're the best thing right now, between faggots posting /pol/bait and retards shouting what am I in for, this generals are the salt of the board.

>>17302693
>Boxer
it's a PUGILIST you faggot NOT A BOXER

>>17302168
are you some kind of retard or just a dense imbecile?

nauman again

>>17302598
what material do you want to work in? that will be the prime determining factor. are you carving wood, chiselling stone, dealing with the complexities of fired ceramics, casting with plaster/silicone/wax, or making mixed media installations..? sculpting is not easy and i recommend starting small.

>>17302869
I love the look of stone the most, but I dont know if its a good starting material. I like the idea of clay or mud but not wood. I hated woodworking in school and it might be similar?

To be honest when I worked with clay in school it was really fun. I guess I could start with that.

Also yeah I'll start small. To be honest I'm willing to atleast try anything as long as it doesnt cost many thousands of euros to just try it out.
>>17302796
Thanks, I'll look into working with clay and mud.

>>17302909
clay is difficult because you need to fire it in a kiln. maybe try air dry clay to start?

>>17302812
I love seeing the retards seethe, but I think I will give a space of a few days before the next thread.
I'm not the anon posting dozen of pics though, he seems to be quite knowledgeable and I have looked up some artists I wasn't familiar with, so he is the one giving some life to this thread.

>>17299774

Zeus: A Study in Ancient Religion by Arthur Bernard Cook (1914-25)
https://mega.nz/file/DDJQlRoZ#no0AAdD5v40lL6HP58Hmc_LUDcFQfAvY3vNbQw5DesA

>>17302817
Yes but the piece is known as ‘Boxer at rest’ so you can fuck off and suck my nads.

>>17300330
>you know x was actually plagiarized from a woman, right?

This trend needs to die. It's always some unforgivably sloppy work of history pushed for political reasons.

Alberto Giacometti

>>17303924
love this, he worked on Samuel Beckett's stage design, pic related is them looking over the tree for the Godot stage

>>17299785
A general on /lit/ seems more than enough. It won't even be around in a few days because too few people care.

>>17303792
so what? If it was the other way around you'd be pushing for it
>>>/pol/

>>17304071
Kill yourself tranny

Thanks for your amazing general, guys. What a horrible idea.

>>17299966
>>>>/ic/
I just went there and I found this. It doesn't seem like these people can discuss art.

>>17304170
How new are you to 4chan?

>>17304216
Been here for about ten years why?

>>17302693
One of my all times faves, the details such as the fucked up ears and the cuts in his face, coupled with the emotion in his face and his defeated posture is amazing. Hellenistic realism is amazing in how human and relatable it is, even after 2000 years

>>17304328
even playful at times

>>17304343

>>17304348

>>17303952
His son and his father also did great works. What a family

>>17304348
Wtf is shi, it is so wrong.
More recent no?
Fake?

>>17305056
Une passion es nee en moi avec ca... :) ce beau cul et cette belle chose molle....

>>17305163
What makes you think that?
>The sculpture was made at about 100 BC of Parian marble, and was found on the island of Delos, in the House of the Poseidoniasts of Beirut. On the low base of the group an inscription is carved: ‘Dionysos, son of Zenon who was son Theodoros, from Beirut dedicated [this offering] to the ancestral gods for his own benefit and that of his children’.

>>17305168
;)
Not really into that sort of thing myself, but its a very cute statue ngl

>>17305204
Hey anon, its morphology is wrong not a probleme usually but its looks wrong.
I guess it is that I am used to think about only the great so when i see less good stuff i bellieve it is more recent.
I sawed in france last year a small expo with old shit student drawings felt funny to know that they where people that where bad in the past (and that we kept it).

>>17305204
And can you give books related to art :)?
Especially related to greeks and romans could be historical.

>>17300502
HOLHY SHIT IS THIS REAL???

I really like Rodin's work.

Traditional corporeal realism is for absolute tastelets

>>17305621
>Traditional corporeal realism
There is no such thing retard

>>17305634
dude we have to go back lmao

>>17305647
I never said that. Its simply impossible to go back even if we tried.

>>17305204
>>17305168
>>17305056
ITS A TRAP
AHAHAHA

>>17305790
You ruined the joke.
By the way i am weirdly not complaining about the pipi

Is it weird to regularly masturbate to statues asking for a friend

>>17300172
Worst
Omelette
Ever

>>17300108
Love her

>>17300661
I want him here. I like abstract modernist art, but stupid degenerate pseuds like you deserve to be mocked.

>>17301199
What's wrong with what they posted? Middling mediocre works, but still mildly interesting. Definitely garish and seems they're ugly to most people.

>>17300661
I do actually, I think its a cool idea for a general. the problem is that it triggers the local /pol/tards that don't actually care about art but need to virtue signal about muh trvdition anyways. The guy from the last thread genuinely couldn't name a single classical piece yet complained about jazz being "degenerate", its really sad

>>17299774
Shit thread

this is a modernist only thread
all post-modernists will be untextualized and cast in concrete

Tf is this non related garbage?

>>17307127
>mediocre
>middling
>garish
Post your taste anon

Anyone else here fetishizes art nouveau?

>>17300330
how are you all taking the bait

Is there no love for the Romanesque style here?

>>17307989
Art Nouveau is troublesome
It marks the beginning of industrialized art and rampant eclecticism. Its extreme manifestation in veinna would inspire the modernist "purification" of ornament

I would love to hear /lit/‘s interpretation on this painting.

Give me the best you got.

>>17306940
Its a tribute to the gods and the arts of course I go cum on the statues everyday.
>>17307989
Its a vaginal art.(you will never be able to stop seing it like this now.)

>>17308301
Utilizing a Marxist lens,

>>17308114
But it's so fairy tale-y

>>17308333
>It's a vaginal art

I don't see a problem with the feminine in art

>>17308301
A dude is masturbating To her.
So she Benedict him to go kill dragons and fight the darkness to be a hero.
Its the moment where the masturbation the desire is pushed to action

>>17308301
kitsch crap

>>17308301
There is nothing to interpret. A surface level representation of a chivalric ideal, the feminine beauty imbued in white representing values like chastity and purity.
I don't know this particular painting, but I'm thinking neoclassicism, probably English.
If made in the 1800s it's simply not interesting enough. If made more recently then it's just a farce.

What do you guys think of outsider art?

>>17308337
gay

>>17308782
So macho

>>17305559
oh, I see your point. Not all art is created equal

>>17305569
I'm actually looking for that myself, I get everything from the internet
anyone here got any recs?

>>17300182
>>17300191
>>17300213
>>17300219
What do you see / get out of these? I'm genuinely curious

>>17308991
Tranny contrarian who just likes shitting on everything

>>17307127
Because they're spamming the thread with trash

>>17308991
I've not yet posted in this thread, but I like the thought of anyone making anything that serves no explicit purpose.

>>17309068
brainlet

>>17309096
that seems a bit vague but alright

>>17308752
It belongs outside

(in the trash)

>>17300690