/lit/ - Literature

>>17241318
Not whole books but Pynchon has some very nice hebecore scenes

>>17241318
>>17241333
Wtf is wrong with you people?

>>17241333
Where can I find these scenes?

>>17241343
Hebephilia is natural for men.

>>17241353
Also let me add that the age of consent was only raised to the arbitrary 18 in the US because of feminists. Here in Europe we don't deny our natural instincts, age of consent is 14 in most countries

>>17241318
death in venice

>>17241400
fuck off, faggo

>>17241353
Hebephilia is not natural, it's not normal for men to be attracted to girls in early pubescence. I'd say after 16 it's pretty normal though.

>>17241444
lol

Why did Nabokov feel the need to write this book? He himself admitted there is no moral. It's extremely well written but it shouldn't exist

>>17241444
Let me guess, you are a woman, aren't you?

>>17241456
Why does everything have to have a deeper meaning? Why can't you just enjoy something because it is beautiful or enjoyable?

>>17241471
Let me rephrase, I'm not saying that it shouldn't exist because there's no meaning, it shouldn't exist because it's disgusting and it has no meaning. And even though normal people realize that Humbert is an unreliable narrator and obviously insane and all that he must have known that actual pedophiles would enjoy it.

>>17241490
>Humbert is an unreliable narrator
how do you know this is correct? Because you're "normal" ? You can even sense the unnecessity of the truth details that he elaborates on. Surely if he were unreliable he would go further so that even you would not hate him? The story is sad and beautiful because it is true.

>>17241515
Because he claims he treats Lolita well when she is clearly suffering and traumatized by what he is doing, she literally runs away. He claims that he loves her when he really only has lust for her, you can see this in the scene where she gets sick and the first thing he remarks on is how he won't get to have sex with her tonight. Not to mention he commits murder at the end. Did you even read the book? kill yourself pedo

>>17241538
thanks for proving my point

>>17241490
You find it revolting, yet still beautiful.
An easy target for your argument would be almost anything by de Sade, but I'd still say that they should exist just because they're disgusting (I remember when I had an argument at my local library because decided to throw out his books). Beauty is a lie (what do I want to say with this about 'keeping Lolita alive'?).
A different 'target' could be something by Bataille (there's a pretty big gap between Story of the Eye and My Mother, but still). Story of the Eye doesn't *really* have a deeper meaning, but it's one of the most fascinating books I've read. There are still beautiful parts (unlike in something by de Sade), but I'm mostly fascinated by the repulsive ones. I can't really get scared by a written word, but that book came the closest to instilling the pure feeling of dread in me.

>>17241553

>>17241538
>NOOO only insane people murder others

>>17241318
>>17241333
>>17241353
>>17241364
>>17241457
Kill Yourselves Subhuman Filth. Pedophiles Get The Rope.

>>17241353
No it’s not you fucking pedo

>>17241444
Wrong
Girls peak at 14

>>17241573
i bet you feel good for posting that don't you

>Kill Yourselves Subhuman Filth. Pedophiles Get The Rope.

Muhammad would be considered a pedophile by today's standards - are all the pedohaters saying Islam is wrong?

>>17241581
true. Everything is heightened: playful emotions, glow, and the rarely mentioned alluring voice. I'm sorry as I can't say this any other way, but their moans are most arousing

>>17241580
It always feels good to tell subhumans to kill themselves. Hell, I'll do it right now, kill yourself faggot.

>>17241601
I’m a hebephile but you need to be in jail or executed or something.

>>17241573
>>17241577
>>17241611

Does all this virtue signaling make you feel better, fag?

>>17241611
ok, i dont really care. These types of comments are boring

>>17241565
wdym I find it beautiful? Because of Nabokov's writing? He didn't have to write a book about pedophilia to demonstrate his writing

>>17241611
Charges, officer?

>>17241515
>having reading comprehension skills this bad

>>17241629
*hebephilia

>>17241611
>reddit post
>reddit image
lol

>>17241624
Dude your a literal pedo of course we hate you.

>>17241658
>we
sure thing pal

>>17241624
>>17241627
>>17241634
Not virtue signaling, just reminding you that you, like the tranny, are a mentally deranged freak who should be ostracized from all of civilized society because you bring about nothing but pain and degeneracy. I want you to kill yourself, please do it, do it.

>>17241658
You don't even understand the difference between pedophiles and hebephiles

>>17241639
>>17241676
The physical, visual differences between prepubescent girls and girls in the very early stages of puberty is extremely negligible. I won't use your terms, there is no difference, and if you say you are a hebephile you are still every bit as subhuman as if you say you are a pedophile. You should be executed.

>>17241675
Please. What you call pedophillia has been the normal status quo for centuries until modernity.

>>17241675
*ahem*

>>17241675
you say all this but when your best friend comes out you wont be so antagonistic as you are now. I know, I've told several of my (normal) friends. Guess what? They don't care

>>17241652
You got it backwards faggot, l*ddit = degeneracy, you are reddit in the year 2040 when libtards finally manage to get paedophiles like yourselves accepted in society and we get more "cuties" type shows on Netflix and have (((Epstein))) parades.

>>17241629
You're just going to ignore everything I wrote?
k

>>17241686
Hebephilia isn't limited to early stages of puberty you tard

>>17241686
>sexually attracted to girls who can conceive
>subhuman
how strange

>>17241712
I don’t believe in sexualizing or stultifying children, so your argument is invalid.

>>17241675
>>17241697
Two sides of retarded

>>17241697
b-bros, I thought people were supposed to get happier and less anxious as they get older

>>17241730
*slutifying

>>17241705
I don't care pedofag, I really hope your friends don't allow you around children but they probably don't care because they most likely are just as degenerate as you are. These people who give degenerates an accepting community instead of help for their mental disease often are. Too bad our decadent society is become more and more accepting of subhumans like yourself as you "come out", for the sake of civilized society your existence must be eradicated.

>>17241716
That doesn’t mean they can consent you retard.

>>17241795
Prove that they can't

>>17241795
Now you’re screeching about consent like a twitter lardass?

>>17241806
>consent is now a tumblr concept.
>t. pedophiles, zoophiles, necrophiles, etc.

>>17241795
then do explain why they giggle and blush, anon. And why do they have sex with those their own age also? Is this not consensual? Either none of this is "consensual," or all of it is.

>>17241795
so if she signs the contract im good to go?

>>17241831
>why do they have sex with those their own age
This is the thing that pisses me off the most. Children should not be sexualized? I agree, thats a fair statement. But then society turns around and is completely permissive toward children having sex with each other, as long as they practice “muh safe sex.” Its pure hypocrisy.

>>17241856
>implying kids having sex is a modern phenomenon
Anon I...

>>17241875
Ok, but it was always a cultural taboo.

>>17241875
that doesn't seem to be implied. It's the blind hypocrisy that is being emphasized

>>17241889
>but it was always a cultural taboo
Anon, I..

>>17241889
>cultural taboo.
It was a taboo for different reasons though, not because of age, but because it was outside of marriage

>>17241938
>not because of age, but because it was outside of marriage
as it should be

>>17241844
Here's a short list of the main things you can't fuck or get off on,
DISCLAIMER, this is not an exhaustive list of all manner of sexual deviancies
so please do not think that you are allowed to fuck or get off on something just because it's not on this list:
> someone of your sex (including trans people who will allows be their assigned sex at birth)
> a child (i.e. someone less than sixteen years of age though preferably someone less than eighteen years of age.)
> a dead person
> family members such as grandparents, parents, uncles, aunts, siblings, cousins, nieces, nephews, children, grandchildren, etc.
> non-human animals of all kinds
Hope this helps!

>>17241965
1) That's not the definition of a child
2) Claims are not arguments or facts

>>17241965
Yeah this one is going at the very top of my cringe compilation

based thread

>>17241795

>they can't consent

uh, anon. they can. and they do. this is an argument used by the feminists. yet, when they were younger, they consented all the time to have sex when they were below the age of consent.

hypocrites, the lot of them. the only reason they want to make you think it's wrong to be sexually attracted to a prime teenage girl is because they are bitter that nobody pays attention to them: they have hit the wall

>>17241976
I get it dude, you want fuck your 13 year old sister, the corpse of your dog that just died, and your 2 year old nephew. Society says it's wrong but those are all just claims, or better yet, spooks. If you really think about it, whats so wrong about raping a baby anyway?
>inb4 strawman
Kill yourself.

>>17241990
>yikes saweetie, did you just imply that pedophilia is wrong? Lord give me the strength to educate this anon! Oh my sweet summer chil'...

>>17241959
So.. Now you just admit that - what you call pedophilia - is actually normal when you consider the whole human history?

>>17242015
>strawman
well it has to be said that I don't want to do any of those things. The very worst thing I would ever do is have pre-marital sex with a girl who initiates, but even this I would want to avoid.

>>17242015

anon, im trying to understand your position. you are very defensive about being attracted to girls who are old enough to reproduce. it makes me think that the only reason you are holding on to your position is because you think you might get morally corrupted, but this has nothing to do with morality or corruption. this has everything to do with nature. nature tells us when a woman can reproduce. when she gets her first period. that's nature's way of saying she can mate

>>17242008
13-year-olds aren't prime, they are unripened, you have to be sick to actually think they're good to go.
And yes they can't consent lol, do you also think that a sub-50 I.Q. retard could consent?

>>17242068
Oh anon, you have completely internalized modern morality and are incapable of seeing beyond you own cultural conditioning. Throughout the vast majority of human history men have married and fucked underage girls, the evidence for this is overwhelming, yet you can't stop doing mental gymnastics to defend your position. It was fun to watch.

>>17242068
ok. Then please protest for all sexual relations involving 13 y.o. girls, so that they may not be corrupted well before attaining legal adulthood

>>17242068

how can they be unripened, when they can reproduce? your mistake is in assuming that a woman should be an intellectual. they aren't. women stop maturing around 16 years old, intellectually. men continue to develop their minds well into their mid-20s.

women are different than men. that is why it's so important, that a man who is intellectually developed (older) and financially secure (older) mate with a younger woman. it's been this way for centuries, before the feminist movement.

it's why women find older guys attractive, and dislike guys who are younger: it's genetics.

>>17242056
Of all the degeneracies you guys have been trying to push into acceptance, this is the most morally abhorrent yet. Imagine a world where some Mohamet marrying a 6-year-old and consummating his marriage with her at 9 is considered normal. sub-sixteen-year-olds are not sexually ready, it's that simple. Only a degenerate or backwards person couldn't understand this. Just because Europoors say it's ok (the French actively harbor Roman (((Polanski))) btw) doesn't mean it is.

>>17241457
It is 100% hated by women because 25+ roasties will seethe at 14-18 year olds having far more power than them. These women don’t even give a fuck about the well being of these young women but are seething because they are jealous

>>17242118
Learn the difference between pedophilIa and hebephilia you uneducated nigger

>>17242181
There is no difference faggot.

>>17242118

>6 years old

anon, that's a pedophile. we are talking about hebephile.

a 6 year old can't reproduce, nature tells us this. how? she doesn't have her period yet. women get their period around 12 years old. this is nature's way of saying she can have babies.

and again, you keep talking about morality. this has nothing to do with morality. this is nature. you are trying to put evil intentions to something that is meant to propagate the human species. sex is for reproduction only, not pleasure. i'm advocating sex with the intention of having a baby and having a family.

>>17242181
There is no meaningful difference.

>>17242118
I assume you hate the degeneracy of the modern world. And yet you don't seem to make the connection that the high age of consent is a modern invention, and related to the sexual degeneracy of our society. Or were you under the impression that the state of western females is in great condition?

>>17241364
Based if your countries weren’t all socialist scum

>>17242209
>sex is for reproduction only, not pleasure
Your coping so bad lmao. You don’t believe this your just in denial you disgusting pedo. Also just because a women gets her period at 12 doesn’t mean she’s psychologically read to have a fucking baby.

Okay how about some books?

Marcel Schwob’s Book Of Monelle
Pierre Louys’ Aphrodite...pretty much everything else he wrote too
John Cowper Powys somewhat, Wolf Solent and Weymouth Sands comes to mind.
Maybe some D’Annunzio? His book Pleasure. I don’t recall the ages of the lovers in that one.

>>17242216
Don't bother trying to convince him with logic, he's a mutt NPC and will never be able to understand

>>17242234
Based, thanks.

>>17242228
young teens would love to have a baby. It's only when they get older that they hate the idea

>>17242209
Females get their period around 10 and 11, Mohomet consummated the marriage at 9. That makes him barely any more of a pedo than you are by your standards.

>>17242228

this is the way it was done for centuries before the feminist revolution. sex outside of marriage was looked down upon. it was degenerate. if a girl was to have sex outside of marriage, the man and women would be forced into marriage.

it's ironic that you keep mentioning degeneracy, yet it would appear that the only thing you are advocating is sex outside of marriage. but that isn't degenerate, is it?

>>17242252
Not a mutt, purebred Anglo actually. kys.

>>17242254
>young teens would love to have a baby. It's only when they get older that they hate the idea
Yes that’s the point. They aren’t mature enough to make that decision and would be psychologically damaged by the process. It’s not good for 13 year olds to give birth.

>>17242270
>purebred Anglo actually
Said without a lick of irony. This board is hilarious.

>>17242252
Let me add two more.

Julien Gracq’s Balcony In The Forest
Colin Insole’s Valerie

>>17242273
>physically and mentally desire to have a baby
>nope, not ready
biology is really cruel huh

>>17242270
>purebred Anglo

>>17242274
Jesus Christ, you are fucking retard.
Yes if I go back far enough in my history there will probably be some Norman, Anglo-Saxon, and Brittonic admixture but none of that fucking matters because most peoples around the globe would be considered "mutts" by that standard.
Fucking idiot.

>>17242255

that's why the European-style of consent was always superior to other cultures. there was a point that was rooted, not in degeneracy, but in an understanding of the true nature of women.

the american feminists have managed to paint this ancient tradition as "evil" and "degenerate" while advocating sex outside of marriage. you see, it was never about degeneracy, it was about the fact that they grew old and never had children, and no man wanted them anymore. so, they changed the laws so that men had no choice but to stay with the older, unwanted degenerate women.

>>17242315
You're really exposing how little travelled you are, anon.

>>17241318
everyone loves a loli even if your a fag and deny it. young cunny is prime wife material. its evolution, its nature. feminism has just skewed that fact over time to support their bullshit

>>17242320
Jesus Christ mate, it's like you think women hit the wall at age 18 (age on the clock rule lol). Not true. And by your logic, marriage isn't natural either. Lots of cultures have practiced polygamy, polyandry, cuckoldry, etc. Moral Relativism is a disease.
>>17242310
Seethe faggot.

cute thread id say 10-11 girls r the best

>>17242320
as difficult as it is to say, the modern trend is the lessening of the power of white males. Race aside, this current society is overwhelmingly female. Men themselves are effects, as they are becoming more and more feminine. This is due to several reasons, politics, technology, etc.

14-15 yos are cute tho even 17 yos

>>17242342
wtf, this is what you find attractive anon?
This little girl barely has curves and is hardly differentiable from a little boy. This is what you are fighting so hard to fuck? You truly are sick.
Please, please, please, stay away from primary schools and also kill yourself.

>>17242347
they dont hit a physical wall, but one of emotion and bonding ability

>>17242347

i was just responding to the other anon who kept trying to make the attraction to a young girl bad because it was morally evil. it was just to prove a point, that even on the moral argument there is nothing wrong with being attracted to a younger girl.

on both fronts, the physical or the moral one, there is an argument to make for the attraction to hebes.

>>17241318
Lolita is the best, even though the message tries to be against it.
There is also La Confirmacion but I didn't find it erotic. Also The Ice Palace, which is a wonderful book but the movie is better, if you get my drift, wink wink.

About to read The Enchanter once I'm done with Pnin.

>>17242350
it's hard to say, but i think this is accurate, especially if you consider the best examples from each age. It's this age that I remember months ahead. That time I ate at the restaurant, or the time I went grocery shopping, or at the beach... I mostly remember those young ones the most.

>>17241318
only "people" i have ever met who have read this are trannies. is it really worth it?

>>17242367

yes

donyou guys actually talk to young girls?

>>17242408
its accurate dood

>>17242274
>>17242310
Fuck off, you guys are fighting for preteen pussy so much you would think your names end in (((-berg))), (((-stein))), (((-man))), etc. (and no I don't mean to say that you guys are Germans, pic rel.)

>>17242438
o stap dont u know in america it was legal not that long ago

>>17241318
Also I'll say once I'm done writing my secret novel fictionalizing the Ukranian child modeling scene from the 2000's, I hope for it to be included among these and talked about by normies. We'll see.

>>17242453
those slav child models r hot or whatever but that shit mKe me sad

>>17242421
No, don't know how to initiate contact. Gonna practice on women my age first

>>17242421
it's not easy. Every time they show interest in public, I'm surrounded by my friends or family, so I can't reciprocate. I do have 14/15 y.o. girls on snap though, but they're not in my area or anything. I don't really mess with them but i think it's funny how they stay around after I tell them my age

>>17242377

incredibly based anon. the truth is so much better than lies. once you understand hidden truths, you never want to go back to the lies

>>17242474
play fortnite stupid

>>17242460
It shouldn't; they all went on to live happy lives and even speak positively about the experience.

>>17242474
just made ur whole life

>>17242453
>Ukranian child modeling scene from the 2000's
Cheers, my friend

>>17242486
thats good :) i hate girls getti

ng abused its the worst shit makes me so sad but its esp bad when its their dad the person w all the security and that makes them feel so powerless and often they arent even believed and get abused. real shitt

>>17242474
from my experience, large shopping centers are the place to go. A few weeks ago some girls were literally running around me and giggling, but my female cousins (my age) had me on a leash, and were muttering and visibly upset over these girls. They even waited at the exit doors, but what was I to do? My cousin already called them "12 year olds"

>>17242504
Since when would a pedophile like yourself care about stuff like that?
Most of you sick fucks just think like this anon >>17242486

>>17242513
ofc theyre cute in public dude all laughing being funny and shit meet them online like a regular person lmao

>>17242513
>some girls were literally running around me and giggling
Things like that would never happen to me irl
I'm not even an ugly neckbeard or anything, but I don't look like a model either... Maybe lifting will help, but that will take at least 1-2 years even if I start to roid

>>17242504
What you describe isn't the case with those models, at least. Now there were some shifty studios taking advantage of poor families, giving them wealth in exchange for the world's greatest commodity (naked girls), but often the mothers would encourage it, be present, and many of the photographers were women. A little sleazy, I guess, a little exploitative, but in the end, the harm is from society's reactions. That's what I want my book to present, anyway, both the bad but also the good. I want it to kind of be objective. The saga of some of the studios just makes for a fascinating story.

>>17242492
:)

>>17241364
Saw this film recently, and really disliked it. Portman's character and her relationship with Leon so clearly exists solely as a physicalization of Besson's own hebephilic fantasies rather than any kind of sincere attempt at storytelling or examination of child-abuse. It's basically a part made for a grown-up girl, with dialogue, outfits and camera shots that would be sleazy-albeit-suitable for an adult-aged female, except replaced by a literal 12-year-old girl for no reason besides the director's own sexuality. I'm astonished there wasn't a greater storm of criticism for this fact, as if seeing a 12-year-old casually depicted as an adult would be was nothing worth noting by film critics or public audiences. A deleted scene from the screenplay apparently showcases the two lead characters making love to eachother (or better said, the rape of a child by an adult), and Besson's personal relationship with a 15-year-old as a 32-year-old himself also adds a great heap of evidence to suggest him a hebephile shamelessly using his films to sexualize real pre-teen girls.

If hebephilia is something you relate to, fine. It's not likely in your control to change. But the sexualization of real girls is, and deserves legal punishment just like any other crime.

>>17242519
oh stfu theres a big diff between child abuse and having an actual relationship w someone

>>17242519
How am I a sick fuck? Girls got paid to take their clothes off and they liked it, and people clambor for it, and the only harm comes when society flips their shit and police beat the mothers to get info about the photographers (true story).

There is nothing wrong with eroticism.

>>17242519
>Since when would a pedophile like yourself care about stuff like that?
Because maybe we aren't actually bad people?

>>17242526
tbf im kinda their type. Twinky, messy hair. At the new year's party a woman said I look 16, most people think im this young.

>>17242528
>I'm astonished there wasn't a greater storm of criticism for this fact, as if seeing a 12-year-old casually depicted as an adult would be was nothing worth noting by film critics or public audiences.
I'm astonished that you don't seem to realize that most men are hebephiles

>>17242544
tru and the best relationships are older men and younger girls. its like a natural attraction

>>17242539
Shit, I look young too, but my hair sucks. I wish I had cute curly twink hair

if u guys actually meet middle schoolers just dont be sexual omg
theyre so used to it just be their friend you'll see how it turns out

>>17242556
from an aesthetic view, I have long thought that men are the more beautiful sex, just look at greek statues etc. But I realized I was comparing men to women, not to little girls, and the balance was restored

>>17242528
(((holywood))) is like that unfortunately, (((Woody Allen))), (((Weinstein))), (((Polanski))), (((Spielberg))), Tarentino, etc. all have tried to push pedophilia. Just look at Netflix and the whole cuties thing is a recent example where people actually noticed, they went too far then. Just a small mistake, they'll correct it and then it's smooth sailing from there. European films, which cutie was, are even worse than American films in this regard somehow lol.

be funny, show them stuff, and show them care, they will love you but dont expect sex, they dont want you to go to jail either

>>17242570
Good point. Going full in is too creepy and I don't wanna be that guy. It should be a genuine and nonabusive relationship

>>17242579
You think it's some hollywood conspiracy, when in reality it's normal men living out normal sexuality. It's funny how this drives conservacucks mad

>>17242602
It's funny, considering conservatives are some of the biggest practicing hebes out there.

>>17242528
>>17242531

>legal punishment like any other crime

yes, i agree. follow the law. don't break the law. if the age of consent in a country mandates that is should be 18 years old, follow the law. don't break the law.

we are just arguing the ideal of hebephilia, the pros and cons of this ideal. it's all arguments based on the abstract, nothing in real life.

>>17242612
breaking the law is a part of life ever done drugs?

>>17242612
>it's all arguments based on the abstract, nothing in real life.

>>17241364
I'm European and that's not exactly true. You can only date a 13-14 years old if you are 2-3 years older than her otherwise age of consent is 16 unless you are her guardian.

>>17242234
>Book Of Monelle
>not on libgen
>on Amazon for $10
(sigh) I'm probably on a list anyway....

>>17242640
gay

>>17242640
You're German, aren't you?

>>17242602
>>17242610
>Not a conspiracy
>Normal men
Accept it was a conspiracy...the (((elite))) literally trafficked young girls and it was probably a (((Mossad))) operation as well.
The elite have done this before, just look up the Kentler expirement to understand the legacy of (((sexual liberation))), look at Wiemar Germany, it doesn't end.
These aren't normal people, these are the scum of the earth and they're our "leaders".
>It's funny, considering conservatives are some of the biggest practicing hebes out there.
Please come up with better arguments, the old "homophobes are repressed fags" is one of the laziest pilpul imaginable.

what do u guys think happens at anime conventions

>>17242627
drugs are self-harm. You want to have a sexual relationship with a literal child whose brain hasnt developed, body hasnt developed, and cannot think for themselves. Children are good and too trusting of others which is why they have to be protected by mentally bankrupt degenerates like you.

>>17242687
i can protect them from evil teenage boys

>>17242696
lel stfu they talk to them either way

>>17242681
The elite traffic young girls because that is what men desire, and when you're powerful and rich, who's to stop you? It's not rocket science.
>Please come up with better arguments
pic related

>>17242696
better they talk to equally undeveloped teenage boys than human garbage tr*pfags

>>17242687
u can stfu with ur brain development ass shit like wtf like ppl get s i smart whej theyrenbraij develops lmaoooo

>>17242681
The elites aren't one person you tard, there is no massive Illuminati conspiracy, only different groups vying for power. And yes, some of them pay girls to sleep with them, but that's what most men would do if they had the money and influence to fuck a bunch of girls on a private island

>>17242712
u can just stfu or add me ;3

>>17242712
that doesn't make sense

>>17241456
Because it’s interesting. Decades later people are still sperging about it.

>>17242650
No

desu there are a lot of jews in power but just stfu bout it dumass

>>17241573
subhuman.

Mods please delete this retarded thread.

>>17242729
This. Plus if it's controversial that's instant sales.
Though he did consider using a pseudonym.

trying to reply to dood but i literally cant read this fuckin thread

>>17241611
Um hello........... based department?

>>17242711
>>17242719
You can lead a faggot to a noose but you can't make him hang himself.
A shame really.

nabokov loved his dum stupid wife anyway probably had sex
w her once every two months stfu

>>17242755
pic related >>17242104

>>17242755
Kys you smoothbrained Qanon nigger, you guys are the definition of dunning kruger

>>17242104
>THE ONLY REASON YOU AREN’T A PEDO IS BECAUSE YOU HAVE MODERN MORALITY DUDE STOP WITH THE SLAVE MORALITY I ONLY FUCK BITCHES IF THEIR AGE IS ON THE CLOCK
Kys faggot

nothing turns me on more than smart girls

>>17242786
now try it without using a strawman

>>17242786
ayy moral and social aspect is a somewhat recent invention some of us dont got that u.u

>>17242785
I'm not a Qanon faggot just not a pedofag either.
I guess that makes me a sane human being, doesn't it?

>>17242789
Agreed, I want a 14yo /lit/ gf

>>17242789
the smartest girl I've ever seen was 9 years old. She was also the prettiest

>>17242743
Yes, please.
And delete all future threads and posts made by nonces.

>>17242800
You believe that the elites are one giant satanist organization controlling the world and raping kids, that makes you no different from the average qanon boomer

>>17242804
ii would love a precocious gurl but at the same time theres something rly charling abt teaching a girl everything

>>17242800
>not a Qanon faggot
>but believes in pizzagate
lol

>>17242816
Never said that faggot, and I'll I've done is point to concrete examples with their own Wikipedia pages lol.

>>17242813
im sure dood

also charming*

>>17242813
Please do tell more.

>>17242832
and the nicest

>>17242829
Again, where did I say that? lol

>>17241581
ngl my childhood crush peaked at 14-15

>>17242821
>at the same time theres something rly charling abt teaching a girl everything
Agreed, half the fun of being with a young girl is helping her develop into a proper adult

>>17242841
>Accept it was a conspiracy...the (((elite))) literally trafficked young girls and it was probably a (((Mossad))) operation as well.
It's literally just horny men with money.

>>17242831
You are repeating the exact same /pol/ qanon pizzagate nonsense that boomers share of fb