/lit/ - Literature

>nothing is right so I can do whatever
>whoever does whatever the most wins
it didn't give me much desu

>>17193875
he would unironically call you a disgusting pleb and wish death on you

>How could shy and introverted people learn from Nietszche´s writings?
You learn that you're scared of other peoples judgement and you lack in power which makes you weak

>>17194068
this will sound strange but there was a thread a while ago, and was about this anon who said that was suffering from C-PTSD and depression and that he was shy/introverted, and a couple of anons suggested him to read Nietszche, and because of my curiosity i wanted to ask them why specifically Nietszche, but the thread got archived and i couldn´t managed to ask them, so i decided now to make this thread

>>17194132
Nietzsche is the ultimate hammer to and the end of all coping. He pretty much concludes (like Spinoza did) that all your problems stem from weakness or lack of ability to act. therefore if you see being introvert as a problem, your power is being checked and overcome by an outside cause

Like Spinoza said "all emotions are a comparison of power between an external cause and ourselves"

>>17194132
Nietzsche tears away a lot of your assumptions (especially moral) and can cause you to look at life with fresh eyes. They may have been thinking more specifically but he's a good read if you need a philosophical kick in the ass.

>>17194321
>>17194295
interesting, so he´s like Max Stirner then, my kind of author

>>17193875
“Whilst stay-at-home persons are searching for truth, the apple will stay on the tree.”

>>17194132
Because Nietzsche philosophized with a fucking hammer.

>>17194368
>so he´s like Max Stirner then, my kind of author
Yes and no
He took some inspiration from Stirner, but Stirner is a neurotic solipsist while Nietzsche is way more ambitious and just an overall better intellectual than Stirner

>>17194467
>but Stirner is a neurotic solipsist

go on, why do you think that? he also argues how false are human morals, religion and ideologies (from the brief excerpts i read from him), he´s a big debunker too

>>17194459
settle down

>>17194467
"better intellectual"
lmao

>>17194516
The only thing Stirner ends up concluding is
>morality bad
Nietzsche deals with value itself, because even Stirner is not exempt from value, no one is.
Nietzsche says very well that "philosophy is more of an autobiography of its author than anything else" so Stirner's philosophy says more about him than morality. With that mindset you can now start reading Nietzsche

>>17194540
>With that mindset you can now start reading Nietzsche

i should better finish with the greeks first before going there

>>17194563
I haven't even started...

>>17194595
you should do it now

>>17194605
Well, I've seen the document titled as The Philosophy Project (here https://docs.google.com/document/d/1y8_RRaZW5X3xwztjZ4p0XeRplqebYwpmuNNpaN_TkgM/mobilebasic ). Maybe will give it a read or use other charts