[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 881 KB, 1700x2151, egel.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17160408 No.17160408 [Reply] [Original]

Other than Marx, Hegel, Lacan, and Freud (i kinda hate all of them) who else can you use as a framework to look at the world and the things in it (literature, art, politics, history, etc)

>> No.17160564

>>17160408
are you asking for other people with totalizing philosophical projects?

>> No.17160587

>>17160564
yes

>> No.17160599

>>17160408
Gustavo Bueno

>> No.17160895

>>17160408
Heidegger

>> No.17161052
File: 58 KB, 640x452, coming.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17161052

Jesus Christ

>> No.17161068

>>17160408
Ayn Rand - fairly shallow worldview though

>> No.17161157

>>17160408
Spinoza (except for art)

>> No.17161167
File: 387 KB, 1052x1312, Smiling Schopenhauer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17161167

>>17160408
Schopenhauer (PBUH)

>> No.17161170

>>17160408
Schopenhauer.

>> No.17161183

the buddha

>> No.17161195
File: 3.24 MB, 1924x2565, Antisthenes (2).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17161195

>>17160408
Antisthenes is massively underrated but no doubt a great thinker, who will be looked at more in the future. Interesting history too, in being Socrates' student and considered by some to be his more authentic.

>> No.17161200
File: 64 KB, 1200x630, Goethe 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17161200

>>17160408
He has a totalizing worldview through its untotalizingness.

>> No.17161229

>>17161195
literally who

>> No.17161240

>>17160408
Anyone

>> No.17161248
File: 200 KB, 1200x1200, basedlord.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17161248

>>17160408
Peter Hitchens

>> No.17161634

Herr Schopenhauer.

>> No.17161660

>>17160599
I opened this thread precisely to post this anon, also Kant probably does the job too but he's too boring when it comes to ethics and politics. phenomenology in general and especially if you're religious

>> No.17161669

Ernest Becker.

>> No.17161674

>>17160408
Spinoza (PBUH)

>> No.17161687

>>17160408
The Bible, of course, which they used themselves.

>> No.17161790

>>17160408
my diary

>> No.17161842

>>17160408
>i kinda hate all of them
fuck you too buddy

>> No.17163146

>>17160408
>who else can you use as a framework to look at the world
Imagine being this fucking cucked.

>> No.17163160

>>17161229
Exactly; just read his wikipedia anon. Pretty interesting.

>> No.17163327

>>17160408
Spinoza, Descartes and many nineteenth century German philosophers.

>> No.17163330

>>17161195
Thanks anon, I'll look into him.

>> No.17163919
File: 924 KB, 2058x1400, kb17050006a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17163919

Montaigne, even lit doesn't seem to know him.

>> No.17163923

>>17161157
>>17161674
>>17163327
Based

>> No.17163933
File: 296 KB, 1254x706, RULES OF NATURE.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17163933

>>17160408
ARISTOTLE
AQUINAS
THOMAS HOBBES