[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 28 KB, 325x259, 325px-1933-may-10-berlin-book-burning.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17151529 No.17151529 [Reply] [Original]

Burn all the proof it existed at. Burn all the books and expunge it from every source.

For me it wicca

>> No.17152416

>>17151529
My diary desu.

>> No.17152457

>>17151529
hegel

>> No.17152469
File: 83 KB, 440x470, 1608863305933.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17152469

feminism

>> No.17152878
File: 48 KB, 480x640, ylt4GA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17152878

>fascism

>> No.17152885

>>17151529
de Saussure
Freud
Marx
Darwin

>> No.17152890

>>17151529
unironically presocratics

>> No.17152899

>>17151529
Corpus Aristotelicum.

>> No.17153185

>>17151529
Everything communist. All of it. I'm not kidding.

>> No.17153200

>>17151529
All books containing significant objectively false information (especially those which are insidious and hard to disprove) as part of the evidence for their argument, no ideology in specific

>> No.17153574

>>17151529
Probably Marx

>> No.17153579

>>17152890
fuck you

>> No.17153581

Rabbinic judaism

>> No.17153611

>>17151529
>wicca
Isn't it just some pathetic larp?

>> No.17153614

Everything in the /x/ Occult Library. The whole thing is just plain, unapologetic trash.

>> No.17153758

>>17153611
It's paganism so yeah

>> No.17153766

>>17153614
>>17152890
>>17153581
You have to go back.
>>17152885
You only get a pass because you spammed the board with your dogshit and I fear reprisal.

>> No.17154441

>>17151529
Wicca would be re-articulated in some other form pretty quickly. It is a product of the times more than it is a coherent spiritual system or worldview.

>> No.17154442

>>17151529
Transgenderism, womens suffrage, Yugoslavian praxis philosophy

>> No.17154661

Rousseau and other enlightenment philosophers

>> No.17154673

>>17151529
books which say bookburning is bad

>> No.17154936

>>17151529
anything written by a jew

>> No.17155008

>>17151529
Book burning is for savages and cowards. The correct response is to refute and build counter arguments to the false ideology.

>> No.17155072
File: 29 KB, 296x276, alpha1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17155072

>>17155008
This. Book burners should be burned at the stake. Not even being ironical.

>> No.17155097

>>17155008
Book burning is based and your glorification of brainwank is not

>> No.17155122

>>17155008
I've always found it mildly funny how people just oppose book burning because it makes them look patrician or gives them a civilised air.

Is it okay if I burn the book after I read it? There's no issue then, right?

Do I need to refute pornography or literature that is expressly aimed at corroding the fabric of society? Because I will for instance not validate degenerate apologist literature by giving it the time of day.

>> No.17155127

>>17155008
Might is right

>> No.17155140

>>17155008
Book burning is okay only when it's the Talmud and Das Capital

>> No.17155163

>>17153766
>t.kike

>> No.17155167

>>17155097
>>17155122
>>17155127
>>17155140
See, cowards and savages.

>> No.17155169

>>17152457
This. The source of all modern problems.

>> No.17155171

>>17151529
The Torah

>> No.17155201

>>17155167
Why did you include me with the rest? I oppose book burning but in the rare exceptions of the Talmud and Marx's Capital it is an absolutely necessary thing to do in order to prevent evil from constantly taking hold of the world. Only kikes and commie degenerates would disagree with this

>> No.17155759
File: 329 KB, 1024x1280, A3518E11-1A30-4A05-A515-474702A1A812.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17155759

lgbtq lit

>> No.17155805

>>17155008
>refute pornography
>refute enemy propaganda
>refute advertisements
>refute intentionally misleading "scientific" materials