/lit/ - Literature

>>17125383
Go back to arguing in youtube comments

>>17125387
>t. defensive scientism believer

>>17125383
Who does this? I'm willing to bet literally no one would say they "worship Richard Dawkins as the messiah". It seems as though you may be delusional about more things than one.

>>17125383
90% of humanity is irrelevant. The retards you're talking about art part of that 90%. They're literal NPCs. There are christfag NPCs as well. You're complaining about nothing, these people are automatons and don't care about what you think.

>>17125383
I'm an atheist and have never read a single Dawkins book

>>17125398
Don’t care about neither god nor science, just hate midwits, fuck you. Peace out

>>17125383
Off topic strawman.

>>17125399
Of course they claim not to do so. But the fact is that it takes ten times more faith to believe Dawkins failed claims than it does to accept Christ.

>>17125409
I wish I had as much faith as you do. Unfortunately I cannot accept the theory that the entire universe came together from a random process. I guess I accept Jesus because I am more skeptical by nature.

>>17125409
You should read "The Ancestor's Tale"; it's good stuff.

>>17125434
>Unfortunately I cannot accept the theory that the entire universe came together from a random process.
The negation of design isn't randomness.

>>17125434
>believes that one day everything came from nothing for literally no reason
>skeptical
Uh...