/lit/ - Literature

>>17108624
Read his latter works, where he realizes that the Tractatus is completely wrong and senseless and tries to correct it

>>17108624
you must have been retarded before

Philosophical Investigations by Ludwig Wittgenstein

>>17108624

atrocious front cover with a typo to boot. Some mediocrity who doesn't care put it together in a half-hour, and some suit who doesn't care gave it final approval.

>>17108624
Absolutely cringe, bro. Not even one of the most formidable philosophers Great Britain's (Bertrand Russell) could understand it, but some /lit/tard like you can and it muh changed your life?

>>17109047
Bertrand Russel was one of the worst philosophers in history though. Even I came up with his concepts by the time I was like 13. By 20, I too managed to understand Wittgenstein with ease.

>>17109070
Pretentious fuck.

if that was true you wouldnt need to ask that.

try his so called second philosophy, maybe youll find it there.

>>17109081
Nope. My parents made me learn ancient Greek at age 8 and philosophy at age 10, Κεράστης

>>17108928
This

>>17108624

How?
I mean, it's a good book, I've written at least half a dozen essays about various parts of it, but I fail how it could change your life in any meaningful way... ?

>>17109152
Then you've failed to see its inherent ethical content. In other words: filtered.

How old are you now?

>>17109105
Do you regret it? How old are you now?

>>17109161

>>17109047
Bertrand Russel was a literalistic sperg with no mental flexibility. Of course he would fail to understand it.

>>17109152

Not OP, but re-read what Witt says about the mystical

>>17109047
/thread

What a goofy.

>>17108624
Subahibi

>>17109070
Which concepts were those?

>>17109299
6.522 is the only important article about the Mystical.

>>17109028
where's the typo?

>>17109814
Russell nvm

>>17109070
nothing personnel, kid

>>17109028
None of the covers are good