/lit/ - Literature

>>17085268
Pete BTFO'd Hackman.
That's the only thing I know about OOO.
I don't even what OOO is the abbreviation of.
Please don't give me (You)s.
Thank You.

>>17085268
>"In metaphysics, object-oriented ontology is a 21st-century Heidegger-influenced school of thought that rejects the privileging of human existence over the existence of nonhuman objects"

How is it Heidegger influenced when they reject the FUCKING CORE idea of Heideggers metaphysics? Fuck HeideggerLarpers man

what languages do i need to know to read this? java?

>>17085399
>Um yes, lest ignore Heideggers phenomenology and idea of truth as a being uncovering itself and showing itself (alēthia), and also skip all of "Being and Time" where in the introduction it explicitly stated that only the human being, as the only being that "uncovers itself from alēthia and shows its being" is the human being, but we are totally Heidegger-influenced trust us, we arent a bunch of pseudos at all!

>>17085399
>>17085438
>Letter on Humanism and the Kehre, what's that?

>>17085480
>Letter on Humanism and the Kehre
>he believes in """""""""Heidegger II""""""""""""
Cringe

>>17085399

>How is X influenced by Y when Y criticizes X

We have a retard over here.

>>17085510
It doesnt criticize Heidegger tho, but only takes one aspect of his ontology, Zuhandenheit, and ignores everything else that lead to it, being completely selfcontradictory thus

>>17085399
The guy who created OOO wrote about a half dozen books on Heidegger

>>17085497
>Why yes, I do consider that Die Selbstbehauptung der deutschen Universität and the 1936-1941 lectures on Schelling are Heidegger's foremost works, how could you tell?

>>17085553
Heidegger's esthetics*

>>17085408
kek. underrated

bamp