/lit/ - Literature

>>16890491
I need to read up on it

>>16890491
I'm convinced no one has ever read it, I only know that I haven't

>>16890491
It's retarded

>>16891159
Economic protectionism when there isn't free trade within the country: based
Economic protectionism when there is free trade within the country: cringe, gay, probably hasn't read basic economic thought

>>16890491
It destroys your nation, it destroys your culture, it destroys your racial consciousness.

>>16890491
It's for wealthy leftoids who are either indifferent to or explicitly pro capitalism, but still need to feel like they are challenging the status quo.

It's the reason I feel more at home with nationalists or populists these days.

>>16891159
Euros do they just decided to import immies

Cope

>>16891206
Yes, I'm describing the Euro's who are voting for niggers

>>16890491
>CRITICAL theory
>They never criticize leftism
huh?

>>16891178
don't agree at all

Wages and IQ so low in most non white countries that even with free trade they realistically will take decades to reach our level or won't ever, which makes it unethical as they're literallly taking our jobs without the oppurtunity for competition from autochtonous individuals. Wages and probably GDP per capita should be somewhat similar before free trade is considered.

>>16891231
You have never read critical theory

>>16891247
To clarify: I get that in theory wages would equalise but I'm stating that the transition period is too unfair for our own countries, we should make our own workers competive by tariffs and thus protectionism.

>>16891240
>thinking I said that because I think it'd make your line go up on the chart
Nah it's time to heighten contradictions to evolve soceity by driving it off the cliff. Also
>blah blah blah muh IQ muh RACIAL SOVL
Yeah yeah okay kiddo

>>16890491
As a leftist, I can honestly say its never discussed or championed in Anarchist groups that I'm a member of. It would likely remain in obscurity if not for the right reacting so butthurt about it, of course it's often made to get that very reaction.

To clarify I'm not talking about earlier social theorists like adorno, marcuse, sartre and foucault who are serious thinkers and championed interesting ideas. Im referring to race and gender theory of the past 20 years or so.

>>16891159
>t. theodor adorno, a founder of critical theory
"decolonization" has nothing to do with critical theory

>>16891282
>To clarify I'm not talking about earlier social theorists like adorno, marcuse, sartre and foucault who are serious thinkers and championed interesting ideas. Im referring to race and gender theory of the past 20 years or so.
>implying rightoids know the difference

>>16891265
Omg yaaaas.
White myn be tryin dey bes but like we black womyn have our truth which be betta. Heya me roar crackas. I be bootiful and curvy unlike yo womyn who be flat lik sidewalks. You nazis be unable to undastan my truth cus you be white and men. Only bootiful black queens can unstand my poetry and beauty!!

>>16891265
I'm a doctor, I have 30 studies on race and IQ on my computer right now. This extends to number of patents, number of great civilisations, number of brain cells, cranial capacity, personal and generational wealth, being able to be completely colonized and used as slaves because of being too dumb for developping weapons.

being retarded and typing 'muh' in front of common sense and falsifiable scientific hypotheses does not and will not change the fat that niggers (and thus you and your family) are retarded.

>>16891291
>

>>16891287
Adorno is one of the early ones, critical theory has evolved and is more retarded now. Decolonisation is most certainly a part of it right now, I literally see it in the streets of my city.

>>16891282
>As a leftist
>in Anarchist groups

>>16891307
>My proof? Anecdotal evidence.

>>16891265
nigger

>>16891265
niggers live in warm dry climates, nigger

>>16891178
this makes no sense at all

>>16891265

nigger

>>16891282
>As a leftist, I can honestly say its never discussed or championed in Anarchist groups that I'm a member of.
So why do you always chimp out over race, globohomo and gender theory in your 'activism' and are always explicitly against the working class and their values?
>It would likely remain in obscurity if not for the right reacting so butthurt about it
You don't find it peculiar that critical theory, racialism, identity politics and woke capitalism exploded in popularity throughout the left just after occupy Wall Street? These ideas are being sold and packaged to you, taking the 'bait' to own the right won't do you any good.

>>16891299
please post them, or links, for I would like to reference such studies. Also I am afraid they will get buried in the current political climate.

>>16891291
>>16891301
You're both making fun of the same argument.

>>16891339
Prof. Lynn his website is a good starting point.

Future Cognitive Ability: US IQ Prediction
until 2060 Based on NAEP

The Effect of Biracial Status and Color on
Crystallized Intelligence in the U.S.-Born
African–European American Population
John G. R. Fuerst * , Richard Lynn and Emil O. W. Kirkegaard

Screenshot is from this paper:
THIRTY YEARS OF RESEARCH ON RACE
DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE ABILITY
J. Philippe Rushton
The University of Western Ontario
Arthur R. Jensen
University of California, Berkeley

Black-White differences in reaction times and intelligence, Lynn

I have more but in the references from those papers you will find lots. Makes retarded leftoids seethe

>>16891307
Decolonization may be in the streets, but critical theory isn't

>>16891265
also this, nigger:
>>16891382

>>16890491
I'm going to be straight with you anon. One of my majors was anthropology and social theory. I'm pretty sure I spent a semester learning critical theory.
I still don't know for certain what another person is actually referring to when they say the phrase "critical theory". There are enough people using it to mean different things that the term itself is rapidly approaching meaninglessness.

>>16891335
Anarchists are anti-racist. Race is an arbitrary distinction when living in a multi-racial society all of which are suffering under late neoliberal capitalism. We fight for the working class and have been instrumental in standing with workers for increased wages. The working class isnt cogent enough to have strictly shared values, we try to fix this by organizing our own workplaces and unionizing. Further, we stand with BLM because police in our country are allowed to commit murder of not only black people but people of all races and not recieve punishment. They also serve to only harm the poor with arbitrary laws that the wealthy can avoid easily or beibe their way out of. We want real justice. Not armored thugs protecting Capitalism from righteous revolt.
>You don't find it peculiar
I find it highly peculiar. I feel like alot of these are published strictly to foster disunity amongst whites and blacks. Curious that you bring up Occupy, because theirs something else peculiar that happened around that time. While gender theory was pushed to leftists. Race Realism was pushed to online alt-right communities. It was very soon after occupy that stormfags invaded 4chans and then a "containment" board was created.

My theory is that the two party political shitshow wasn't working on the youth. We were organizing on the internet and discussing things subversive to American Corporate hegemony. Therefore they discovered a foil for both extremes. Gender theory for the left and alt-right shit for the right. Now they have the youth acting just as tribally as the boomers. They get to keep their hegemony while we demonize each other and alienate ourselves from the normies on either side.

Surkovian disinformation campaigns and psyops.

>>16891400
Damn you mean moat inpoverished and lowest IQ correlates almost exactly. Magical

>>16891447
lel, watch the other evidence retard, yes obviously the dumber are most impoverished

>>16891382
thanks

>>16891447
They literally have measurably smaller brains and less brain cells. Obviously it would improve somewhat if we, smarter whites, used technology we created to help them with hygiene and infection prevention. I'm confident that blacks' IQ can improve quickly with infection prevention and proper nutrition. But then we get a jump from 70 or so IQ to 85 or so, and then they reach about their genetic ceiling. That is what we see with 300 years of migration from Africa to America.

>>16891433
Why doesn't the group you refer to come up with their own name. Why did they co-opt "anarchy". Modern anarchists seem to have little to do with what anarchy used to be. Anarchy never had anything to do with antiracism. A thought experiment makes it evident: how to enforce it? You can't. Anarchy is about natural states (as in status) and doesn't enforce any sort of "correct thinking".

>>16891461
most of the screenshots are also mine, you should save them. Certainy the one with the adoption study and the Economist one.

>>16891447
google "Alternative Hypothesis". The guy is also still on youtube, I think. It's all about proving that crime is correlated to IQ not poverty. From this you can also follow other things, including why low IQ people end up poorer than peers in an equal position but with higher IQ.

rightists need to be put in camps. libertarian left are dumb. auth left or gtfo.

>>16891517
>auth left or gtfo.
based nazi

>>16891517
it's all so tiresome

>>16891517
>rightists need to be put in camps
why

>>16891524
imbecile

>>16891529
>national socialism
>markets are controlled by the gov
?????????????????????????

>>16891455
>>16891469
Yes but to focus on race as the most important determinant is false and arbitrary. Environment and culture make a bigger impact as does generational access to decent wages and education. Blacks in America still haven't caught up, because they still receive significantly worse education and live more often in poverty due to the lack of generational wealth(reee should worked harder and saved). They did and then their banks were disbanded and they lost everything.

Pic related is a 16 year old with an IQ of 162.

>>16891538
This. Nazism being right wing is historical revisionism from the 50s. Leftwing intellectuals loved Hitler and Mussolini in the 30s.

>>16891549
do you understand the concept of statistical power? Because you have nothing here.

Do you understand IQ? Those child prodigies are almost always precoccious children (as in maturing very fast) and very smart at the same time, most people like him will turn out at IQ 145 or maybe 130 when fully grown. If you don't understand this, than you should look up the definition of IQ.

>>16891527
another rightist non-reader. it's all so tiresome.
>>16891528
they are brain dead
>>16891538
national socialism is auth right. and a market economy vs command economy has nothing to do with marxism or communism. it's an irrelevant debate. but no surprise that you don't know this since you get all you knowledge from memes you being another brain dead rightist non-reader.

>>16891549
plus did you even see what happened when you adopt blacks in wealthy white families? they're still dumb.
>their banks were disbanded: let's say it's true (it's a complete lie) why could they not protect their banks from being disbandend? They're dumb on a group level, of course they can be smart individuals, they're just not on average.

>>16891528
rehabilitation

>>16891580
>Define value as an illusion (social relationship that appears as a tangible characteristic of a thing)
>screeching when value isn't valued to illusion

Also I read and study daily.

>>16891490
Anarchism has always been avout eroding hierarchies that can't be justified. Some hierarchies can be justified, father to son, the hierarchy of expertise. Racism creates a hierarchy that doesn't hold up to scrutiny. Well you can do alot to enforce fair policing. Zero tolerance body camera usage. The establishment of community review boards. These are the things I brought up to my citys mayor when we attended the public town hall meetings. Also defunding police is pretty hard to argue against for certain cities in America. The city services and infrastructure are piss poor but the poloce can buy 2 million dollar fake cell phone towers that can(legally)intercept any phone call or information of a phone within a huge radius. They are extremely overfunded amd it's utterly unnecessary. We also frequently speak out against cancel culture because we enjoy freedom of speech. That you dont see it in your echo chambers is your problem

>>16891580
>jfk loved the socialist policies of Nazi Germany
>traveled to Germany in the 30s, came back to burgerland and praised Hitler and his policies
>FDR loved Mussolini and sent burgers to Italy to study fascism and their progressive ideas
>Mussolini reviewed FDRs new policies and praised him for importing Italian ideals
>both JFK and FDR were democrats
??????????????????

>>16891549
Jews are 2% of the US population and own the banks with an avg IQ of 107-113

>>16891159
Critical theory rejects both of these retarded fucking claims.

>>16891636
I have no idea what you are responding to

>>16891664
Elaborate somewhat please.

>>16891665
I'm not surprised.

>>16891665
lel two digit IQ leftoid, classic

>look up critical theory
>self-referential nonsense almost entirely based on a laundry list of cope from black lesbians
>Hegelian in essence, but replacing synthesis with an eternal antithesis (Whiteness) that cannot be overcome. Applied mostly in legal arenas to explain the differences in conviction rates and criminality in the early 80's but then explodes in the 90's with Crenshaw's "intersectionality." Basically build-your-own-lightsaber but for oppressed peoples.
>Radical redefinition of oppression lies at the heart of the whole thing. At least with Marx there was a clear, obvious crime happening (extraction of surplus value). The intersectional conception places literally any and all differences in outcomes under the umbrella of oppression. It's wild. It places the actions and thoughts of non-White peoples as inherently moralistic and of the best quality possible, or at least it has to because it presumes this to be the case in order for the differences in outcomes to make sense. A young black individual who struggles to read, for example, is clearly trying her very best. Therefore the only explanation for her lack of literacy is inherent racism in literacy instruction and of the language she is learning more broadly. I found evidence of "Ebonic Grammar" being taught in some CA schools and just about died laughing.
>It isn't "theory" in any meaningful sense. It isn't predictive of anything. It does one trick, and it does it lazily.

>>16891576
145 is still extremely high, higher than the majority of white people. I've read plenty of pseudoscience in my time fren.
>>16891589
This is all so simplistic. Some adopted black children do outperform the average, the phenomenon hasnt been studied enough to be concrete though, and you're missing the generational aspect az well. I don't claim that genetics has nothing to do with it, but you look a fool when you only focus on race and exclude any other possibility. That black people in America have significantly higher IQs proves that environment and opportunity highly effect the data. You just stand on shaky science to confirm your own internal bias. You could come to much more complete understanding if you reflected on and researched where your biases lay.

>>16891662
Oh yeah the banks. Black people didnt "allow" the banks to fail you racist nimwit. Freedmans failed and ran off with what was left of their dough. Their was also "black wall street" in Tulsa where blacks lost everything because they were murdered by ignorant hickish white folks jealous of their success.

>>16891684
Yes 145 is extremely high.
IQ is not pseudoscience, it is the most accurate predictor of lifetime health, lifetime wealth amassed and correlates with brain volume and reflex speed.
Do you not understand that a genetically black outlier does not prove that blacks are dumber on average? Of course SOME do outperform the average of whites. Jezus have you ever taken statistics?

>>16891694
Where did I say blacks allowed the banks to fail? they did not, but they weren't smart enough to keep their money if I were to believe the theory that whites closed their banks (I don't at all).

Blacks: 13% population, dumb as a rock and can't create wealth.

Jews: 2% of population, create wealth disproportionately inspite of antisemitism and being a minority of 2% as opposed to 13% (blacks).

???

>>16890491
We live in a society that will never critique itself

>>16891729
retarded

>>16891681
Good post.

>>16891668
It is not at all a claim of critical theory (if it is understood here to mean Frankfurt Critical Theory) that blacks in Africa have any right over African land, or any sovereignty. The idea of sovereignty for Africans as a way of combatting the horrors of colonialism is a reactionary concept that reifies the concept of 'Africannes' as a distinct and important category, and for the critical mind must be rejected as something which should be positively reinforced. The same goes for all racial categories and concepts of racial sovereignty over any given territory.

>>16891552
bullshit.

>>16891707
Outliers dont explain the statistics, statistically speaking less Jews are Wealthy elites than whites or other Jews. Those are statistical outliers so we should ignore them.

The jewish culture and tradition revolves around strict schooling at a young age and involves frugality and wealth creation.

More Jews are average than wealthy though so those wealthy bank owning outliers don't matter.

Right? Is that what you're saying? Outliers don't matter. Phew that sets us up for a world of problems using statistics buddy.

>>16891762
And then they advocate quotas to 'include' more 'people of color', again a positively reinforced categorie.

Postmodernism claims to reject grand narratives and the manipulative use of language but it literally does nothing else. All other philosphies at least also try to accomplish other things.

>>16891636
FDR, JFK, and all of the Democrats are rightists. America has always been a right wing hellscape.

>>16891787
Postmodernism can't be seen as a grand narrative either, there are too many different forms of thought that you could group under 'postmodernism'

>>16891778
On average, jews are richer than any other religious group.

You should not be on this board, you are rejecting facts and through sheer stupidity misinterpreting anything I say. I wil not continue to answer after this post as I have refuted all of your claims easily and your claims are a waste of my time.

>>16891805
It's an amalgam of different grand narratives competing, just like all other philosphies it splinters. Doesn't mean each of the somewhat influential forms of postmodernism is trying to be a grand narrative (and is succeeding somewhat). Christianity is a grand narrative, Judaism is too, both grand narratives within religious narratives.

>>16890491
AFRICAN AMERICAN MICROPENIS

>>16891812
*isn't trying to be a grand narratives

basically: yes postmodernism is not one grand narrative, but each faction within postmodernism is trying to become one (some are succeeding, most don't, like in life).

so it's a semantics discussion and boring from here on.

>>16891707
Here's something else I find incredibly funny. So many studies found a strong correlation between racism and low IQ that they made a meta-analysis confirming it. So maybe because of your low IQ you can't understand what Im trying to explain to you.
>>16891807
Except you've refuted nothing lmfao. You can't and so now you're conceeding. Yes your graph is true but take the whole of Jewish Americans and the average still arent extremely wealthy. The outliers are whom your relying on for your dummy dum worldview. Its become part of your identity so it hurts when youre called out on it.

Here's a study proving what everyone already knew. Racist attitudes correlate time and again with Low IQ. Only a midwit couldnt conceptualize that humans should be judged on an individual level and that biases are harmful to your own rational thought.
https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2027

>iq
>>>/x/

AFRICAN AMERICAN MICROPENIS

>>16891837
I will answer with just this: of course most racists are low IQ, they get filtered by the societal propaganda and just follow their instincts (created through millions of years of evoution), the group between 100 and 130 is an intellectual deadzone because of oversocialisation.

I'm a medical school student and scored top 5% in my entrance exams literally without studying and without intent to go to med school after going to a party and four hours of slep. I have no insecurities regarding my intelligence whatsoever.

You are again proving your complete lack of understanding of statistics. Most racists are low IQ, yes. That does not disprove whatsoever that most 130+ IQ'ers could be heavily racist (no such study has of course been done or can ever been done seriously, just like I want to see a study which proves low IQ and racism are linked without using education as a proxy).


'The average still aren't extremely wealthy'
>The average aren't not average

Please just go to reddit.

Even if the average jewish wealth was the consequence of a skewed distribution resulting from some extremely wealthy jews, why would that differ from the shame skewing for blacks or whites? Where is your proof that the skewing is through some jew-specific skewing effect?

>>16891837
>https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2027
The link is broken, nice try nigger

>>16890491
AFRICAN AMERICAN MICROPENIS

>>16891837
I want to add that in real life, I always judge an individual mostly on an individual basis. I have black and brown friends, not much, but some.

These 'racist attitudes' work very well in predicting behaviour on a group level, not on an an individual level, which is why you would not ever think of me as a racist if you met me in real life. This shows of course again your misunderstanding of statistics for the third time.

>>16891837
Everybody knows this lol, normies gonna norm. I know where you are located on that graph.
Hint: 110

>>16891848
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-IQ-Controversy%2C-the-Media-and-Public-Policy-Snyderman-Rothman/246b4d837894d3251eaa6cee2a9c761cb10ea951?p2df

>>16891961
the concept of an unobjectionable transhistorical and transcultural Intelligence is nonsense and belongs on >>>/x/

>>16891681
This post can't be refuted.

>>16892008
Good arguments, I think the thousands of professional psychologists will now just stop working and the problem is solved.

>>16892022
>the thousands of professional psychologists will now just stop working
would be a net good for everybody lmao

>>16890491
One picture

>>16892030
AFRICAN AMERICAN MICROPENIS

>>16892027
Yes, you have now also proven this beyond doubt. Please go on, scholar of absolute unbaised reason and spiritual strength on a crusade to purify the world from all non-intelligent dirt.

>>16891902
Oh so you're an outlier? Hahahahahaha
Rejected. Look, if you were truly intelligent you wouldn't be stuck in this trap. Listen funnily my IQ is 139 for whatever it's worth. I'm a PA who will probably do medical school when I feel like it. Only reason I havent is because I have a wife and child now and value my time with them.
>>16891928
I havent misunderstood statistics you imbecile nor claimed that race had nothing to do with it. I simply said there are more important factors involved in determining IQ and any other stereotype you've brainwashed yourself into accepting.

I doubt your story about your intelligence based on your reliance on "redpills" that reek of pol. I've never met an intelligent racist, and I'm including you in that.

>>16892064
LeL, in two years you are working for me hahahahahah

like I already said: nobody in real life knows I'm what they consider racist, and you won't either

By now I have seen that you have no factual claims left and retreated to ad hominem attacks, I'd like to express my disappointment in your lack of argument and will now take the win, thank you.

>>16892064
yes: not getting hit by a stone in the head is more important than race, not being dead is too, but that does not refute the fact that race determines to a significant amount how intelligent you can become on a genetic level. Literally everything arounds you keeps telling you that but you keep adhering to your childhood-indoctrinated equalist propaganda.

From: 'THIRTY YEARS OF RESEARCH ON RACE
DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE ABILITY
J. Philippe Rushton
The University of Western Ontario
Arthur R. Jensen
University of California, Berkeley'

see>>16891382

>>16892064
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSo5v5t4OQM

Watch this it's more on your level.

>>16892064
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iF8F7tjmy_U&t=15s

Also this I recon that you will need a lot of videos because it appears to me you refuse to read, seeing you're a PA.

>>16891787
>And then they advocate quotas to 'include' more 'people of color', again a positively reinforced categorie.
No they don't, shut the fuck up
>Postmodernism claims to reject grand narratives and the manipulative use of language but it literally does nothing else. All other philosphies at least also try to accomplish other things.
Critical Theory isn't postmodernism you larping pseud

>>16892107
>>16892137
>>16892141
>>16892158
Lmfao seething and rapidposting. This is a sign that you're defensively protecting your obliterated worldview. Also
>claims to be smart
>posts biggest pseud on the planet.

Look buddy, you don't get it, I've read the bell curve, I've read your studies, and I've read the responses to them. They're utter inconsequential to my daily life and that of my family. I've already said that I understand there's a relation between race and IQ. It isnt universal though, it isnt infallible, it doesnt change the fact that race is immutable and that the other MANY factors contributing to race are not. I mean, its funny that you consider yourself intelligent yet rely on this contested scientific approach and apply to how you relate to society. I know we can't all be smart anon, but idiots like you could benefit from some serious Cartesian reflection, you post like an anxiety ridden teenager, desperate to prove yourself right, but you know you arent proving anything to me, no, this racism is your mantra and you must repeat for yourself until you no longer have to question your stupidity. You could do better if you're actually intelligent, which entails more than IQ. You probably arent though, so this fearful and paranoid dark place of existence will remain your plane. You're debating yourself and ultimately it's harmful, not to me, botbto blacks, you're utterly insignificant in that regard. It's harmful only to you.

>>16890491
I'm just going to parrot Jordan Peterson without bothering to critically think for myself:

Marxism

>>16892539
>Marxism
DONT DISRESPECT MY DADDY

>>16892316
jesus, give him a break anon, I agree, but lads probably like 17 if he felt the need to brag about med school like it would prove anything over the internet. wrecked him but what for?

>>16891433
>Curious that you bring up Occupy, because theirs something else peculiar that happened around that time. While gender theory was pushed to leftists. Race Realism was pushed to online alt-right communities.
This isn't true. This had been looking for a way into the mainstream for decades by that point. It was significantly less sudden and out of the blue than the woke capitalism shit.

>>16892628
That there was already some(very very few) users who felt this way only made it easier for the stormfag psyop to spread.

>>16892692
If you want people to read a bunch of graphs, then make sure your image is properly blown up.

>>16892628
I can't lmao. It's true though, lurk long and be skeptical of "redpills" they're made by somone, someone with an agenda. Some are organic, but our government is far more intelligent than you seem to think. They're using the redpill against those who want to believe bad enough. Reality is much more complicated than the worldviews you see on pol. There's a reason it was created.

>>16891632
90% of people who claim themselves to be anarchists are complete retard as well as assholes trying to make themselves interesting or pretending to be morally good by simply giving a "Good label to themselves. And somehow it works in today's age. "Good" is not the actions you do, its what you label yourselve as and what you say. That's the problem. You can be a heroic doctor. If you have a swatiska tattoo you are evil. You can be a total piece of shit. If you wear a blm shirt everybody will believe anything you say.

>>16893424
I will add that I find this situation extremely abhorrent. It is the perfect situation to be in though if you are a narcissistic psychopath who has no problem with lying. And a lot of leftists are this way, they even admit so. Saying a lie with good result is good etc. They admit it themselves. So it is no surprise that lying leftists enjoy this.

>>16891614
The opposite is true you nonce, capitalists collaborate on a vast scale to lobby/monopoly.
The point is intraclass conflict, not selfishness. People are impelled by their economics to work in a specific way, it's nothing to do with human nature.

>>16890491
It ruined anything even remotely connected to the Arts. In college you'll spend more time breaking down classic works, comparing them to some modern shit and then basically whittle down some great book into "a product of its time" and nothing will be learnt from it. Then afterwards you have hundreds or thousands more retards who can't actually look at a classic book and know why it's good and instead only be able to fucking "unpack" or criticize a book over the most pointless shit possible.

>>16891178
>Meaning cannot exist outside of its economic implications

>>16891159
You're racist

>>16891807
if somehow jewish people lose their wealth. then some other religious group will be richer than all else. will you then keep doing this till nobody as any wealth?

>>16892022
>I think the thousands of professional psychologists will now just stop working
You try to make this sound like a bad thing but it's really not

>>16892316
Dumb retard, you had every opportunity to make strong arguments but instead stood there strawmanning like a redditor. Now that he's gone you actually put some effort behind your post and claim "destroyed!!".
Dumb retard.

>>16891282
>ancom
Why the fuck do people think anarcho-communism could ever work? If you let people do what they want without any governing bodies they will surely amass wealth. Those who prefer to amass wealth than share will create their own communities and they will forcibly subjugate their previous community after a few generations.
I recognize I'm being demeaning but I would like to understand the reasoning behind supporting such an ideology. I doubt a socialist economy can function without an enforcing body.

>>16893601
And you're a faggot
>go back