[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 321 KB, 2655x703, pedo tard.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16818115 No.16818115[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

what are some philosophical works that are able to assess and explain the phenomena in pic related and how it is possible for such a people to exist?

>> No.16818144

>>16818115
>philosophical
You want psychological works delving into the infantile fetishization of children.

>> No.16818159
File: 125 KB, 500x384, 1561584563465.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16818159

>>16818115
It's progressive goy

>> No.16818186

>>16818115
can you tell me why pedophilia (if no one hurts the child physically and psychologically) is bad? like arguments and not just appeal to morality

>> No.16818191

>>16818159
How come all the pedophiles are rightwingers?

>> No.16818197

>>16818186
>can you tell me why rape (if no one hurts the victim physically and psychologically) is bad?

>> No.16818214
File: 1.77 MB, 3360x3299, ce79ac2e8d24d84e263ca70bdb4aa02c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16818214

>>16818191
>How come all the pedophiles are rightwingers?

>> No.16818233

>>16818144
Does the DSM-V actually do a further analysis of it?

>> No.16818242

>>16818115
Either foucault or Rothbard. One of those will give you an answer

>> No.16818243
File: 226 KB, 800x798, 800px-Marquis_de_sade.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16818243

>>16818159
All according to plan

>> No.16818246

>>16818191
How come so many homosexuals are pedophiles?

>> No.16818250

>>16818197
yes, why is it bad? if you dont hurt anyone, why is rape bad?

>> No.16818310
File: 99 KB, 1024x1024, 15658098092373.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16818310

>>16818115
Why don't you actually respond to me in the thread you coward?
>>16818144
You cannot "fetishize children" any nore than you can fetishize beauty.
>>16818159
>>16818191
>making this a political issue
jfc none of you are very bright
>>16818243
What plan, idiot?
>>16818246
>How come so many homosexuals are pedophiles?
This isn't even true and pederastry is not pedophilia and "homosexuality" isn't leftwing.
>>16818250
Rape IS bad. Arguing with antis is like arguing with dogmatic marxists because you're arguing with them within their own presupposed axiom i.e children cannot consent therefore all sex with children is rape,
...which apparently means consentual sex in one border is fine but in another it's rape.
Pure idiocy