/lit/ - Literature

>>16757011
Wow cool.

Maybe science can make some nice looking buildings other than shitty squares for once.

ASS

>>16757011
Take your meds schizo.

Debunked.

So evolution was just baneposting?

Primal religion wasn't even bout God.

(CHRISTIAN) BELIEF, AND SCIENCE; FAITH, AND REASON, ARE MUTUALLY COMPLEMENTARY, NOT MUTUALLY ANTITHETICAL, BUT THOSE WHO LACK EITHER OF THESE —OR BOTH— WILL NEVER UNDERSTAND THIS COMPLEMENTATION.

ATHEISTS VAUNT THEMSELVES AS «FREE», AS «SCIENTIFIC» —WHAT FREEDOM CAN HAVE THOSE WHO RENEGE OF GOD? WHAT SCIENCE CAN HAVE THOSE WHO ARE NESCIENT?

>>16757011
Post scientific art, OP

>>16757085
NO.

>>16757085
a tripfag? being based? the fuck

>>16757091

>>16757085
utterly, completely BASED

>>16757098
kek, it seems lads that we've set the old tranny to a-seething!

>>16757032
>>16757037
>>16757085
gosh religitards are so fragile

>>16757107
Wow this is really bad. Thanks for letting us know science does things with minimal effort. Explains a lot actually

>>16757112
He is simply erroneous. A biggot, a pedophile and holds many false ideas about faith and science.

>>16757011
no argument was made for why we should reject our evolutionary past.

>>16757011
>if a God existed, He wouldn't make religiosity evolutionarily favorable, He would make religiosity something that fundamentally goes against our nature and something that is like asking a square peg to fit into a round hole

>Because of evolution, we have a disposition toward teleological thinking and mentalizing
We're not that good at it. I guess we need an AI to calculate all of the consequences of our actions so we can truly be HUMANE and ETHICAL. I guess those theists with their domineering God were right after all! In truth, we're not deontological or teleological creatures, we use either as the situation demands.

>Evolution caused us to think in terms of purposes, so if we have psychological disposition to think in purposes it makes sense that we believe in a creator
Wow, I guess we don't need to believe in a purpose because it's just evolutionary anyways! What's the point, again? What's the purpose of making this post?

> Since we have a disposition to do this, we tend to think of God in anthropomorphic terms
I'm sure that doesn't encroach on his transcendental nature, it's just our way of understanding or conceptualizing him.

>Studies also show that people with these dispositions in lesser degrees, such as autistic people, are less likely to believe in God
No wonder so many philosophers are atheists. Make autism Christian again

>>16757130
Everything is good, there is no evil. All according to God's will, and all within that according to our will, and it is preferable due to our evolution to will cooperation and to will the extirpation of opportunists, psychopaths, murderers, barbarians, homosexuals, and freaks of nature like you

>>16757011
>Science shows
You blew it right there

>>16757011
Evolution, eh?

>>16757098


IN CHRIST’S CHRYSALIS

YOUR FIRE TURN TO LIGHT, AND BLOOM,

GREEN CATERPILLAR.


« 零 »

>>16757170
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eauGAgiAvAA

Damn right, brother

>>16757152
>Schizobabble

>>16757170
>AND BLOOM
Harold Bloom.

>>16757214
It was a refutation of Epicurus' argument about God and muh evil and all that. It's basically from Boethius- if God is omnipotent and can do no evil, then there is no evil, annulling that dualist view of good and evil.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6wNhHeEzAc

>>16757011
You realize if something panpsychism or vitalism were true, you just gave an argument for the existence of God, right? Your argument's conclusion presumes physicalism's validity.

>>16757220
That saying is for choosing the god you believe in.
Christians are stuck with two gods. Or three depending on what you want the holy spirit to have

>Tranny collector

>>16757237
>something
a position like*

>>16757252
>>16757220
Youre both dumb, God is 4, and evil is a real part of him. There is no need to answer the problem of evil because its not really a problem

>>16757011
>autistic people, are less likely to believe in God

>>16757252
I wanna be the very best
Like no one ever was
To catch them is my real test
To train them is my cause
I will travel across the states
Searching far and wide
Teach trannymons to love their fate
The gender that's inside

More "lalalal it's polytheism I don't want to hear about your philosophizing" cope

>>16757258
God is 10 you dumbass. 4 is the cosmos

>>16757011


huh no, science is just a narrative like any other and it is not proven at all it investigates anything

This is because formalized science is based on logicized maths, hyped as ''the language of the universe'' by posci addicts lol

and logicized maths is based on logic

all mathematicians are logic babies addicted to ZFC and they are all platonist, ie ''numbers are real bro not social construct''.

By the way truth is not found in logic. Logic is just a field by autistic pedants about well formed formulas and valuations, ie sending a formula to 1 or 0 and asking what are those valuations which are stable under inference rules. Zero truth in this, especially truth in the casual sense. Tarski truth is moronic, meaningless. Peak atheist.
Just like there is no truth in science, just some stats and a stat convention for saying ''if p value is XXX then the result is''true''''

This is why science is shit for politics and even for daily life.
At best scientists can come up about some stats about some formal system. Like ''this material has such and wear and tear, therefore our backlog of such conditons lead to 60% of breaking in the next year''
That's the pinnacle of the scientific claim and all their claims remain phrased as uncertainty.

>>16757011
Read Lyotard
>>16757789
Based

>>16757316
Obsessed.
Rent free
Ngmi

Can science explain why people are healed miraculously?

>>16757893
Penn and Teller will explain it

>>16757170
>>16757085
BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED BASED

>>16757985

>>16757011
You wouldn't have science without christianity. I'm not even a christcuck. OP is tiny brain cock gobbler.

>>16758078
False.
You’re full of shit

>>16757011
no one cares faggot. science won't exist except in japan and china by 2100.

>

Science shows that religious beliefs, such as EATING FOOD TO SURVIVE, arised from nothing more than remnants from our evolutionary past.

eating fags btfo