/lit/ - Literature

Last thread was full of sociopaths who either didn’t understand the book or didn’t actually read it. So it depends on what exactly a “Stirner fag” is to you

You don't need Stirner to be an annoying retard
Did you just add anything meaningful to anything with this thread?

>>16643420
Not all annoying retards are stirner fags but all stirner fags are annoying retards.

>>16643394
I have never read his book. Was he hedonistic?

>>16643394
>>16643428
You still think /lit/ is your personal support group, huh?

>>16643428
For Catholics, tankies liberals and nationalists, perhaps

Something about spooks

>>16643410
>>16643443
Stop replying to my threads and go clean your axe wound
>>16643441
Shove it up your ass.
Anyway now that i have your attention
Marxism was made by and for failures.

>>16643452

>>16643394
No, except for a religious egoist who once told me that the worship of God is not a spook if you do not doubt the existence of God, since salvation would then be within your individual interests.

>>16643502
>Spooks grant salvation from its own own wrath
You two didn’t understand the book

>>16643394
I definitely have

>>16643394
>meaningful
lol, spooked

>>16643518
I don't give a shit about Stirner, that's just what I heard.