/lit/ - Literature

One question at a time please.

>>16626304
Having a truly unconditioned existence is reserved only to those who achieve Awakening, and that doesnt include French pseuds with shitty Freudian theories.

>>16626304
>Make a case for humanity
I like them
> Is humanity really condemned to the worship of the great other?
If a group of them can avoid it, why can’t the rest?
>Could people really be satisfied living in eternal peace with no reason to live other than to fulfill their neurosis, which is rooted in society?
Nothing is eternal, but achieving peace, they’d search ever further outwards
>Is humanity really that pathetic?
Humanity is capable of almost anything

>>16626350
They are all the same question

>>16626371
>If a group of them can avoid it, why can’t the rest?
What group has avoided it?
>Nothing is eternal, but achieving peace, they’d search ever further outwards
I meant peace as in the lack of any conflict, save for the ones inherent in societal existence
>Humanity is capable of almost anything
Then destroy the societal geist and unobscure your will, retard

>>16626405
>what group
Secularists and general übermensch
>I meant the peace as in the lack of any conflict
Time will continue to chisel away at us bringing some sort of conflict, no matter how much a demigod we become
>destroy the geist
That would be retarded. Society is currently bounding for just that. I’d prefer we craft it at will. To be something other than the earth’s laxative

>>16627059
>secularists
As much as Butterfly says she reads Stirner and Nietzsche she is still a bourgeois Whig