/lit/ - Literature

this was the first book that made me judge life from a more natural perspective, really opened my eyes.
the next book that redpilled me was the industrial society and its future by theodore kaczysnki

Lol homopagan trash

>>16604264
>Muh women bad, let’s suck cock in da woods

based??

>>16604264
Sexual Utopia In Power
>>16604472
>>16604507
Straight men don't have the relationship with masculinity necessary to write something like this.

>>16604264
"The Manual" by W. Anton

>>16604553
>straight men do not suck enough cocks to know what masculinity is

>>16605298
The fact that Donovan is sexually attracted to masculinity is part of what I imagine sustained and focused his interest on it, yes. Also as a ghey he was able to observe straight masculinity from the outside and permeate the world of women to get a viewpoint that differs from a traditional straight man because of it's outsideness and because of how women treat him differently as a get, though he talks mainly of masculinity in a nonsexual and survival-oriented way. He reasons in terms of what the male mind are oriented towards because of early long-term evolutionary conditions. The problem with masculinity, as BAP points out in his book is that all space is owned in the modern world and the instincts are separated from their true purpose, so masculinity itself becomes a LARP that exists for no practical reason other than to please women with an aesthetic physique or manly personality. Donovan wants out of this through a renewal of tribal and semi-primitive life by choice, though because this is based on choice rather than necessity as in the oroginal genesis of tribes, it is inherently unstable and easy to leave. Unless there is a big technological collapse, the possibility of true communities existing in the future looks bleak.

>>16604264
Isn't donovan a literal pole smoking queer

>>16604472
>>16604507
>>16604553
real men don't need a woman, homo platonic love is the ultimate red pill, women are only cum buckets with tits to play with and that smell nice

>>16605467
This. Imagine reading a book about masculinity written by an actual fucking fudge packing faggot.
Are there actually good books on masculinity that were not written by fags or quasi-fags like Peterson?

>>16605467
Yes.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=meLmupt5oWs
>>16605484
Women traditionally provide practical benefits like (obviously) reproduction, cooking, and cleaning. They are also cute and pleasant to have around. They socoallt enforce the dominant morality no matter what it is, it seems, so that is potentially useful even though it sucks now.

>>16605484
Why do you faggots always have that lisp when you talk?
Why can't you just act and talk like normal human beings? Is it because you want everything to be about you?

Where were you when Tarrant BTFO'd Marx?

no thanks

>>16605528
When did that happen

>>16605528
>We’re gonna make it
>By doing the exact same thing