/lit/ - Literature

>>16594118

He’s not a philosopher.

>>16594118
You can't technically be an existentialist and not kierkegaard and still be a philosopher.

The myth of sisyphus was one of the first philosophic texts I read and is a great way to get into reading philosophy :)

>>16594161
I'm also tranny if that helps

>>16594161
Was this before you went blacked

>>16594171
wjllowo? what happened to your twitter?

>>16594171
>NOOOO YOU CAN'T LIKE CAMUS BECAUSE I READ ONE OF HIS BOOKS IN HIGH SCHOOL!!!!

I prefer black philosophers

>>16594193
>>16594194
Cope homos, existentialism outside kierkegaard is trash. It was eceleb shit of their time and they admitted as much. You have poor taste, don't drudge everyone else's

>>16594161
>my introduction to philosophy was Camus

dam that’s really embarrassing I would keep that a secret from possible blind Caucasian boyfriends in your future

>>16594118
Kiki is the only legit existentialist

>>16594204
>walk into café
>notice qt reading The Stranger
>lol monoglot pleb, but even still in French it is garbage
>decide to hit on her and pick her up with esteemèd literary knowledge whose depths are as deep as Sisyphus' climg is high
>I surreptitiously siddle over to her
>I make a gun with my hand and place it on my jawline
>"Ah yes...I remember when I thought I was learnèd for reading Cuh-moo. Of course now I know better. Hmph. Perhaps I could teach you. M'lady?"
>the wanton swine doused me with coffee and the heathen of a proprietress bootèd me out on the cold hard pavèd sidewalk
>suffice to say that establishment will never profit from my patronage nor the patronage of the select colleagues of my esteemèd and cultured milieu
>whore

>>16594288
>qt
Guys don't do that cause they know you'll beat their ass

>>16594118
Since American philosophers exist. No.

>>16594359
Cope faggot, it's not time for you to wake up.

It’s a heavy blood flow

I was going to say yes but I forgot I was forgetting every analytic philosopher

>>16594535
>he says on a computer
Bad b8 anon

>>16594118
There are dozens and dozens worse

>>16595239
Namely fascist "philosophers."

>>16595620
If Marx is a philosopher, so is Feder

>>16595620
Let me get this straight. We are excluding all philosophers that landed on the losing teams? Or are we determining fascism to be "bad" and thus all thoughts in the proximity of the "badness" is to be thrown out, thus disregarding all fascist philosophers from the collectively chosen list, aptly named: "The Glitter-glued sparkly chart of the Top Ten meanest of the mean skullfuck philosophers, extra grizzled, twice based"? Or perhaps you mean butterfly is a virulent nazi socialist sympathizer who is probably a closet Holocaust denier and soapbox socialistic mouthpiece who reconstructs the "bad guys" into guys who "weren't allllll that bad" to qualify her obsession with the enslavement of all mankind? Or perhaps you mean that if you harbor an ill-faith moral position it's impossible to be dubbed a "philosopher" in any respect - AT ALL. OR PERHAPS YOU MEAN grabbing a yardstick and marking the "power" and "worth" of a philosopher arbitrarily along the distances is about as retarded as it sounds.

Hegel

>>16594118
""""""""""""""""philosopher""""""""""""""""

>>16595620
Dilate

>>16595734
>Replying this seriously to a trollpost instead of just calling your opponent a faggot and moving on

>>16594118
one of them for sure. the french never were able to produce one single top tier philosopher. just failure after failure

>>16594118
He kinda nosed his car into a tree before he could really mature his thought but what's there is pretty good.
his work is not theoretically build out or elaborate but it is well thought out and intuitive.
imo there is potential to build out his ideas of man vs a lacking world into a proper a metaphysical theory of incompleteness.
(Zizek seems to be working on something in that direction through Lacan and Hegel although i have no idea on the details)
>>16594161
He really is the perfect philosopher to lay a philosophical foundation in high school and thats not in any way to his detriment.
its a really good habit to not want to immediately resolve or deny every philosophical tension you encounter and the le boulder man essay helps with that.

>>16595663
>If Marx is a philosopher, so is Feder

The Rebel is his best work.

>>16594118
Somehow Sartre managed to be a worse one in his later years

>>16594118
>its all rats
>rats everywhere
>your mom is rats, your job is rats, there are rats under the carpet and rats under the stairs
>oh fuck you caught the plague
>it's all plague and rats and we're all plagued with rats and ratted with the plague
>everything is grey and rats and plague

not only a philosopher, but also the most based one i'd say desu

>>16594171
go and kill yourself

>>16594565
Analytic philosophy has nothing to do with computers and you have to stop coping this way. Leibniz made the first description of a computer and Babbage built the first complete blueprint, both before analytic bullshit was a thing. Neither Shockley (or the entire semiconductor science and industry) nor von Neumann nor Knuth or any other were even tangentially related to analytic philosophy. Kleene is the closest contact point and that's already reaching.

>>16594118

they hated camus because he told them the truth

>>16597999
that was a pretty good read. checked and blessed.

>>16594118
Both him and Sartre are just secular versions of Kierkegaard and I'm not even a theist

>>16599999
>>16500000
checked

>>16600000

I haven't read anything by Camus, but see him hated a lot. Why?

>>16600029
because he is "entry level" and easy to understand, dude writes some good shit but not something that will make you scratch your head wondering what he meant so it does not please the edgelords around here
add to this that his philosophy is not the most profound one and is not about hating life, jews or niggers and you got your answer

>>16600040
Thanks

>>16594118
is the fall any good? i loved the stranger but the plague was honestly one of the worst books i ever finished.

>>16599999
>>16599999
>>16599999

>>16594161
I lack crirical thinking. Why is he so bad again? I'll memorize ur opinion and use it on others and act smart so make it good please.

>>16594118
>NOOO I AM not AN EXISTENTIALSIT I AM AN ABSURDEST!!!!

yes he is the worst philosopher, if one even considers such a hack a philosopher.

>>16594118
No, Ayn Rand exists

>>16594288
Fucking kek

>>16600369

He bad. Just say he bad and you'll be fine. No need to explain.

>>16600009
>>16600016

>>10000000

>>16594288
>è
Looks like we have a British aristocrat in our presence

>>16595620
Well now you've gone and upset the newfags from /pol/

>>16594171
Kek