/lit/ - Literature

cringe. read a book.

>>16431298
A technocapitalist dystopia with megacorporations in the place of states

big zoo with brownish mixed nigger race. population 500 million. chinkjew rulers in the high tower look down, rub their big fucking yellow nose, and say
>what a wonderful world

>techno-socialist
>powerless
>propertyless
Why would we be powerless and propertyless under socialism? Socialism would give workers more power and property would be publicly/collectively owned and your home and car would still have your personal property.
>fully automated luxury communism
Sounds cool.
>which one is more likely
Tbh I think the way things are going, things seem to be tipping more to the far right sadly. But the reality is socialism or extinction.
>which one would be a better future?
I don't know, you called both dystopia's, but I get that your conceptions are more darker than how I look at it. For the 1st one you said we would be powerless and propertyless drones, for the 2nd one a dictatorship of the proletariat due to automation?
I guess I'll choose the second one, sounds pretty chill, no stress can work on my hobbies maybe find a gf, travel.

>>16431298
>Which one is more likely? And which one would be a better future?
A monarchy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTbS8BEa1oI

>>16431314
thats the comfiest scenario

>>16431298
Population control, miscegenation leading to reversed Flynn effect, loss of history and shared identity. Each city will be the same, and a stranger on the street may as well be from the other side of the world. You will have no idea who they are and what they believe in. Good proles get a Skinner box, bad proles get labor camp. A caste at the top that controls industry through monopolies. A new feudal system. In other words, a greater expression of the current working order.

>>16431298
1st but with Chinese characteristics.

just go the based Anarcho-Communism route, you dumb simping wagie

>>16431840
>Anarcho-Communism route
this literally means the communists killing all the anarchists, right?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_Insurrectionary_Army_of_Ukraine
>It soon became clear why Moscow had resisted the publicizing of the Bolshevik-Makhnovist treaty. On November 26, 1920, less than two weeks after completing their successful offensive against General Wrangel's White Army in the Crimea, Makhno's headquarters staff and several Black Army subordinate commanders arrived at Red Army Southern Front headquarters to participate in a joint planning conference with Red Army commanders. Upon arrival, they were arrested and executed on the spot by a Red Army firing squad; the Makhnovist treaty delegation, still in Kharkiv, was also arrested and liquidated.[12][14] The Bolshevik then sent 5 regular Armies numbering more than 350,000 with armoured cars, artillery,aircraft, and armoured trains, with the purpose of destroying the Makhnovist movement.

>>16431298
We won't have access to current technology in the future