/lit/ - Literature

>>16361620
>Please don't argue about the film even though that's precisely why I made this bait thread

>>16361620
>I'm purely interested in literature about mob justice mentality and performative righteous indignation
Sure you are, pedo

The Madness of the Crowds

>>16361627
I'm a zoomer, weirdo
>>16361629
Thanks

>>16361627
Clearly you are interested in niggers or at least want bait other anons talking about niggers.

>>16361629
>Douglas Murray
based

Plato's Republic, Thucydides

>>16361650
so?
>>16361686
I'd rather not actually

>>16361620
I haven't seen any clips of the movie, is it that bad?

>>16361620
There are a few books that have been published on internet Cancel Culture, but they aren't very good. Wait a few years.

>>16361746
It's worse than you think

>>16361732
teenagers can't be pedos
>>16361746
I don't know and I don't really care desu
it's just outrage fodder

>>16361746
It simply reflects the reality of what's happening to young girls today. You can do something about the underlying problem, or you can get angry at the messenger.

>>16361779
if you'd seen it you would understand the outrage, even your zoomer brain should be able to comprehend why

>>16361620
>I'm purely interested in literature about mob justice mentality and performative righteous indignation
The outrage came from the fact that the entire Netflix description was originally just "here's some little girls tweking: the movie". But why didn't they watch this to find out? My first sentence answers this question.

>>16361788
>you can get angry at the messenger.
the one that made over 600 11 year old girls twerk with crotch shots you mean

>>16361804
Twerking isn't the problem, simpleton.

>>16361788
So a film where actual people were murdered to show that murder happens and is bad would be okay in your book? lmao

>>16361812
No retard but it's a symptom, how is making over 600 11 yos twerk helping the supposed cause? Why not make an animation, or a documentary then?

>>16361812
So what is the problem?

>>16361620

>>16361620
Literature isn't as shallow as your netflix "film". So please don't ask us ridiculous questions.

>>16361816
>dancing is murder
Calm down buddy

>>16361620
Why do elites get all the sweet underage pussy? Save some for the little guy!

>>16361858
that's not what I said, you absolute retard

>>16361626
this

>>16361812
Twerking definitely is the problem, it's an overtly sexual style of dance that has become so popular that children are starting to imitate it, and they will continue to do so as long as it remains popular. You can't hypersexualize your culture and expect it to stay compartmentalized.

>>16361816
Dance moms is literally more lewd than the film and no one is mad at that or the million tiktok videos of preteens doing worse things
stop being so disingenuous

>>16361746
Remember when /tv/ mods banned anyone who talked about it? It’s worse than you think

>>16361875
I'm not disingenuous, I think those are just as bad, but nice whataboutism

>>16361869
>overtly sexual style of dance
They say that about every style of dance through the centuries. Get over it, grandpa.

>>16361620

The only thing WRONG about CUTIES is that the little GIRLS weren't CUTE.
If we're HONEST, all men want to FUCK little GIRLS. Everyone LOVES seeing 12 year olds in SHORT SHORTS and TANK TOPS on the BEACH. They are in the prime of their LIVES. What NOBODY wants to SEE is busted little HAGS contorting themselves to SHIT MUSIC while a female JEW director salivates over them. If the FILM was about a cute little GIRL physically loving an OLDER MAN, it would have been wildly successful.

>>16361816
There is nothing wrong with twerking in itself. It is good exercise.

>>16361887
If it's not sexual then I guess you have no issue with the movie

>>16361895
Yes there is. And even moreso when it involves kids, sick fuck

>>16361895
It is a shitty exercise.

>>16361886
Why is no one seething at it then?
Where are the million dislikes?
clearly people needed this film to explicitly tell them it's bad

>>16361896
All dance is 'sexual' to some extent, as the evolutionary purpose is mostly to display fitness. Wearing makeup is also sexual. But if a girl wears makeup as part of an acting role, it's not some kind of sexual abuse.

>>16361620
"The Thankless Pit of Degeneracy: Confessions of a 4Chan Janitor" is a good starting point that shines some local light on the matter (just the chapter on /tv/ cunnyposting).

>>16361920
You're kind of avoiding the issue though, nobody has a problem with kids doing a tapdance or whatever, but this raises alarm bells, and it's because it seems sexualized. Not to mention that it often accompanies music that is explicitly sexual.

>>16361919
Because this film was pushed in their faces, most people above the age of 20 (who are now the vocal group outraged) isn't on tiktok/aware of what happens on it.

>>16361904
>>16361913
There is zero evidence of any physical threat to health. It is known for strengthening your core and glutes. That's why exercise classes often involve twerking.

>>16361920
so what was the film trying to do then? I thought it was to bring awareness to the sexualization of children? Retard

>>16361934
All dance and music "seems sexualized" -- that's kind of the point.

>>16361938
I said nothing about health, there's many other ways to get healthy. The problem is with the negrification of western culture of which twerking is a prime example

>>16361620
It has nothing to do with the film per se nor is a modern phenomena. Cuckservatives generally use children as a sword to push through their insanity and they love to be outraged about stuff. Getting pissed about WEARING A MASK IS AGAINST MUH FREEDUMBS gets boring, hence they needed a break with SAVE ZE CHILDREN.

>>16361943
If you had watched the film you would know.

>>16361955
shitty bait

>>16361960
Nice way of dodging the question, pedo. You BTFO'd yourself

>>16361954
>the negrification of western culture of which twerking is a prime example
The "Cancel Culture" movement is the prime example of the destructive force that whites exert on any human expression that is not as bland as they are.

>>16361949
Conflating clothed people doing a squaredance to an instrumental with almost naked women twerking to a woman singing about her wet vagina doesn't make much sense.

>>16361938
>That's why exercise classes often involve twerking.
Exercise classes unless taught by qualified instructor are a sad joke, some thot in yoga pants showing hiw to "twerk" is a whore, not a qualifed instructor.

>>16361955
Oof.

>>16361975
>You BTFO'd yourself
Ironic.

>>16361935
I'm pretty sure they know about dance mom tho
the whole thing is just selective outrage, the film's actual content is of little importance as demonstrated by how many didn't even watch it before deciding to boycott Netflix. Sad seeing people exploit the sexualising of children to further their political agenda

>>16361985
Twerking burns 400 calories an hour while strengthening your core.

>>16362002
You disingenuous motherfucker, it's a film literally sexualizing children. If they had made a documentary about the phenomenon, it would have got the message across.
You are the one politicizing everything, freak. Any decent person would oppose this but you see it as an opportunity to demonize those who don't align with your politics.

>>16361977
not him, but what exactly does cancel culture have to do with anons reply? cancel culture is part of negrification of western culture, but it seems you used it as some kind of counter argument

>>16362002
The "outrage police", despite not having seen it themselves, have ironically boosted viewership of the film by at least ten-fold.

>>16362025
The "Cancel Culture" movement are people protesting the very existence of this film because it dares to shine a spotlight on real issues they find uncomfortable to talk about.

>>16362039
They're not mad at shining a light on it but HOW the film does it, dense fucker

>>16362015
That is not a lot, also twerking for straight hour will probably leave one with some sort of injury, it is an unnatural movement.

>>16361620
>performative righteous indignation
So, faggalam, what's unperformative indignation?
>>16361831
Because they're actresses, even at 11, and they're paid. They're low-class kids, and that's what the movie's about...
>>16361839
That's the fucking question but all you care about is how you're shocked at seeing little girls twerking when it's really not a big deal. Go on Youtube, girls as young as 3 or 4 do like they see on TV. That's the fucking problem!
>>16361869
Maybe you missed the whole talk, or I'm interpreting what you say wrong, but hypersexualization and compartmentalization are completely unrelated for the matter. If you expect fighting degeneracy with Swedish dramas about 19th century farmers then you don't really understand the problem.
>>16361620
>>16361626
>>16361627
fpwp as always. Now we're talking about this stupid movie nobody even watched... Self-professed conservatives are talking shit as usual and they think they can try to cancel it because everybody else does it, but since they're retarded and illiterate they fail to pick a good cause. Fuck this shit, when is it they'll start complaining about burning the Amazon forest for fucking söj or insane workloads in public hospitals?

>>16362061
>Because they're actresses, even at 11, and they're paid. They're low-class kids, and that's what the movie's about...
Then why not make a documentary about it? Now they've subjected hundreds of innocent kids to the same thing they are supposed to be against. Their parents forced them to be actresses, idiot.

>>16362061
>hypersexualization and compartmentalization are completely unrelated
What I meant was that if you hypersexualize young adult culture, it will not stay compartmentalized to them, children imitate teenagers and young adults.

>>16362039
Cancel culture movement is primarily leftists trying to cancel anything that is part of white culture or history, that also includes people who are proud of their white heritage and not afraid to show it.

>>16362046
How would they know about the HOW if they started to bitch about it before seeing it?

>>16362046
The film was made in compliance with the law.

>>16362039
Just to reiterate, all the CancelCulture idiots are WHITE. Their goal is to 'white-out' any work of art that has any vitality to it, retaining only the most vapid of pablum.

>>16362076
>hypersexualize young adult culture
Unlike back in the gold old day when kids got sold into marriage and were expected to pop out babies by the time they reached 18?

>>16362086
BECAUSE IT'S A FILM AND NOT A DOCUMENTARY
>>16362089
Then the law is wrong
>>16362089
They're (fellow whites))

>>16362084
>Cancel culture movement is primarily leftists
Lmao. Leftists are pro-free-speech. They're not the ones with their panties in a wad, livid over some low-budget film from Sundance.

I mean if you think about it, prison is not humane for the pedo. What humanity is there in locking a raven wolf in a box, letting it pace around, dribbling its filth all over the floor, until whatever spirit it maintained finally abdicates? If we are to be humane to the wolf, we let it devour the lamb. This clearly will not do for us, however. What is cream, what enlivens joy in us but the mind of a child? The wanton experience of life brand new? Do we not seek it all our lives once we lose it? And does it not combust even the dustiest soul to think that, in the chaos of the material world, in its seeming randomness; that such a thing so trusting, so perceptive to the effulgent wellspring of life, that such a thing could be? And what do we say to the pedo, in all our toiling, in all our use of whatever freedom we posess to protect such life and wish to increase it, to he would destroy it for his passing pleasure, to he would burden a fledgling spirit with the grind of adult pain? We are either humane to the wolf or the lamb, there is no road inbetween. For if one lamb is devoured by our permission, and only one, we forfeit our humanity in its entirety. May we not judge those who destroy what little good has managed to establish itself in the dark? Is it not the depth of love to hate that which would tear down beauty? A good man plants a tree for his children to enjoy, he believes in the future, in something beyond himself. The creampedo rends the tree to burn, to keep himself alone warm a night while a child shivers in the cold. That is because the pedo believes in himself only, and the self is but dust; he believes in nothing. Ignore his attempts at ethical rhetoric, his offended reply, and content your heart to know that these people can be killed with God's blessing.

>>16362093
Well yes, that's not a hypersexual culture necessarily, the Victorian period was notoriously prudish. Just in the past 70 years you can see a steady increase in the focus placed on sex and the relaxation of taboos surrounding it.

>>16362103
>Leftists are pro-free-speech
You cannot be this retarded.

>>16362116
How do you deal with the violent cognitive dissonance going on in your diminutive brain right now? Holy hell.

>>16362089
>>16362103

Yes they are mostly white and all liberal or just far leftist, but you have false understanding of what cancel culture is.

>Leftists are pro-free-speech
Pic related

>>16362124
>>16362116
lolbertarians are the biggest advocates of free speech imo, more than far right/left

>>16362113
> the relaxation of taboos surrounding it
Which led to less sex and fewer teen pregnancies. Probably helped to minimize amount of STDs too.

>>16362128
Inbred rightwingers are the ones protesting the film, numbnuts. Get a clue.

>>16362075
But then you're going to watch that documentary? They've subjected none other than the boring 30yo hipsters couple to say "uh boy, better not show this Carly B slut to my baby girl". Nobody was forced in the whole deal! Neither the kids,the parents, nor you to watch it.
>>16362076
Again, there's a "them" that's lost in expression here. But okay, though teenage/adult culture is already hypersexualised as it is. I don't think putting more butts and tits will make it more appealing to kids. I think you're mixing a whole lot of stuff together, because it's also a problem in itself nowadays, but yeah, children need to be kept from stuff, including porn obviously.
>>16362116
A pro-free-speach leftist ignores what false leftists will say. That's the crimsonpill.

>>16362129
The few who actually believe in it. Most of them are just right wingers who consider free speech their right to call everyone a nigger without consequences.

Look what sort of people are actually suing others for using speech.

>>16362129
The left is far more pro-free-speech than the lolbertarians.

>>16362131
The teen pregnancies drop was probably due to birth control, abortions, women entering the workforce/university, etc. STDs I seriously doubt went down. These are in any case not relevant to my point which was just about how sexualized culture is.

>>16362136
>But then you're going to watch that documentary?
Rather than the film, yes. For obvious reasons.

>>16362136
>Again, there's a "them" that's lost in expression here.
The 'them' refers to young adults, I think that was pretty unambiguous. Teenagers/kids copy young adults, you are never going to get them to stop doing so, so the more sexualized the young adults are the more the children/teens are as well.

>>16362124
>>16362129
>>16362136
Under what rock have you been living these past few months? It's not right wingers that think you should be cancelled, fired and arrested for saying "all lives matter" or "white lives matter"

>>16362140
Not in my experience they're not.
>>16362137
>without consequences.
What consequences do you mean here? Free speech is an ideal remember, not just a legal matter.

>>16362168
Those are radlibs not leftists, dumbshit.

>>16362175
Same difference, retard.

>>16361620
Kids are dumb and vulnerable, they're not developed enough to understand the implications of presenting themselves in a sexual manner, unlike the adults who reap the rewards of conditioning and exploiting them.

>>16361620
The Paranoid Style in American Politics by Richard Hofstadter.
In effect, the American right has an extremely limited tolerance for nuance, and tends to project its fears and insecurities on its enemies, seeing signs of cultural decay and immorality everywhere. The poster for this movie was stunningly tasteless and worthy of derision, but the movie is actually criticizing the very sexualization and corruption of girls the unwitting right is reacting against. Perhaps it is too gauche for rough American sensibilities. But I assure you that 99.99% of the outraged critics of this movie's assumed premise have not seen it and thus are raging against their own hallucinations in typical fashion.

>>16362184
They hold literal opposite ideologies, moron. Get out of your bubble.

>>16362186
>raging against their own hallucinations in typical fashion
Studies have shown that the vast majority of child molesters hold extremely conservative views. By fighting this movie, rightwingers are really fighting themselves. It's a shriek of externalized self-loathing.

>>16361620
KILL YOURSELF, DOGSHIT PEDOPHILE KIKEFAGGOT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-BGOV9iZVI

>>16362192
No they don't, they're two sides of the same shekel, and if you can't see that you've been conned hard.
>Get out of your bubble.
The irony, it hurts.

>>16362246
You and the SJWs are on the same side of the same IdPol coin, you just don't know it. Whatever surface disagreements you claim to have, you are both serving the same master.

>>16362131
its also led to a situation where so many people are charged for class A CP on their computers in the UK that theyve had to stop arresting people for it since the prisons are too full. Its also led to people like incels existing because sex is the main focus of everything and they think their life is not pointless without it. The tribal people like you who stick to one side of an issue forget stuff like this

>>16362133
Yes, because it is negrification of white culture, they are protesting but nothing will come of it, they protest against homosexuals and socialists and many other things, no one cares. Cancel culture is when some obscure leftard expresses some fake anger on twitter over I don't know, a statue, person, university course, and then the whole world media +dog gets behind it and get it removed, canceled, fired etc

>>16361746
>Is it that bad?
From what I've heard, yes. I'm not about to watch it and put myself on a watch list to find out

>>16362185
the supreme lack of emotional intelligence in most people makes this point fail to register to them. they simply cannot comprehend the concept of responsibility

>>16362276
Your "point" is self-refuting.

>>16362223
>people should defend pedophiles if their politics align with their own
wow, very revealing post about yourself

>>16362256
You assume that I'm something that I'm not, idiot. What master am I serving then?

>>16362288
Who are you quoting?

>>16362285
Care to explain how?

>>16362156
No, not obvious at all! A film is a written piece of art, a documentary is an uncertain collection of moments. The budgets, methods and purposes aren't the same. Autistically, you fail to make a point in an otherwise interesting discussion.
>>16362163
Yeah, I got you my man. You're right, but I don't think anons here have got the audience of that movie right. We should definitely act on the real problem (slut culture) rather than complain about the little kids who rightfully make mistakes, as the little people they are.
>>16362168
Well right-wingers are in cancelling mode over this stupid film, not he "libs". I'm sure if you say all lives matter with all your heart and kindness it'll go fine. I did it last weekend and everybody was with me. Just don't call people niggers, you fag.

>>16362299
You were criticising right wing people for attacking right wing pedophiles. I said that this was very revealing about how you view politics. Hope this helps, thanks for being truculant to stave off having to post an argument for 2 minutes.

>>16362303
>No, not obvious at all!
Because the docu shows what is actually happening. The film, in order to show this, has to subject innocent children to the same horrors. How difficult is it to understand this?

>>16362260
>theyve had to stop arresting people for it since the prisons are too full
Alternatively to it staying in the family and no one getting charged? Sharing of videos is the smallest issues with CP. The stuff starts way before – and children not being believed nor even having the language to describe what happened to them or know that it's wrong was a much bigger issue in the past.
>Its also led to people like incels existing
Not really. Their own failures at basic social life come from too much sheltering. You couldn't be an asocial fuck back in the day as easy and were forced to learn social skills.

>>16362303
>I'm sure if you say all lives matter with all your heart and kindness it'll go fine.
Maybe you're around a select group of very open minded people, but no that's not what's been happening throughout the west these past few months. Nigger.

>>16362301
Most adults lack emotional intelligence and thus cannot understand the point. And what's the point? That adults have emotional intelligence unlike children. Self-defeating circle.

>>16362313
I'm pretty sure the child molestation itself is what is being criticized, dumbass.

>>16362314
https://youtu.be/2kXD_C0JCNY
https://youtu.be/15T2HGd2H1w
This is what's actually happening. Again, the girls weren't harmed, they were paid, the film isn't obscene in showing them. Is this so horrible you can't watch an 11yo's covered but for 10 seconds?
>>16362324
>the West = Murrica
Get your head off your butt, son.

>>16362316
Your first point is just pure fantasy. Give me any sort of source proving a link between consumption of CP and not molesting your family members, otherwise its sophistical cope. Doesnt the evidence actually suggest people who watch CP are FAR more likely to molest children, hence why its taken seriously as a crime?
>sharing of videos is a small issue
Yeah, being part of a consumer community that creates demand for more is harmless. Helping spread a mental disease is harmless, normalising this kind of behaviour in echo chambers that share this stuff and defend it is harmless. Utter brainlet.
>last point
Sex education is not openly sexualising kids and flamboyant sexuality being beamed at them 24/7.
>their own failures
People are products of their environment. The incel phenomenon has arisen because of the modern environment, im not saying they themselves have no blame but pretending it comes out of nowhere is dishonest

>>16362303
>Well right-wingers are in cancelling mode over this stupid film, not he "libs". I'm sure if you say all lives matter with all your heart and kindness it'll go fine. I did it last weekend and everybody was with me. Just don't call people niggers, you fag.
They are just protesting, very likely it is a peaceful protest, when liberals protest people get seriously injured or even die.

>>16362327
...what? Either you think this is smarter than it is or you are just trying to confuse people with bullshit. A lot of adults will not recognise the difference in accountability and responsibility between themselves and others. Pedos are so overtly narcissistic that they will often refuse to aknowledge their own powers of manipulation, coercion ect compared with the ignorance of a child. They also know the concequences of their actions, unlike a child. Im saying the low emotional IQ comes in the form of actively accepting these things

>>16362375
Can't disagree. Get off your high horse though, violence isn't politics, it's a false-flag manoeuver. Don't identify trouble-makers by their fantasies. It's a never-ending escalation, it's fine if you're the accelerationist type of guy, just don't talk to me please, go back to standing there in the corner.

>>16362364
> the film isn't obscene in showing them. Is this so horrible you can't watch an 11yo's covered but for 10 seconds?
Yes, and if you can you're a pedo
>the girls weren't harmed
Yes they were, that's the point. Otherwise the entire premise of "we're showing this to bring awareness to something that harms girls" falls apart, idiot.
> they were paid
So they're prostitutes now? You're not making it any better.

>>16362364
I'm from Europe, retard. It happens here too.

>>16362440
>Yes, and if you can you're a pedo
You're the pedo for seeing anything children do as sexual.

>Yes they were, that's the point. Otherwise the entire premise of "we're showing this to bring awareness to something that harms girls" falls apart, idiot.
You don't appear to comprehend the concept of acting.

>>16362399
>Im saying the low emotional IQ comes in the form of actively accepting these things
What things? What "emotional intelligence" ? what are you even talking about?

>>16362399
I read that with the Kermit voice and it felt good.
>>16362440
>if you can you're a pedo
That hit hard in my daddy genes. Cut your balls off, faggot.
>>16362446
>the West = white people
ftfy
Of course it does, that's where the damn movie is from.

>>16362367
>between consumption of CP and not molesting your family members
That's not the point.

The point is that most molestation happen in the family. CP is just a side result of a tiny, little share of it. Sans the few rare examples when it's actually produced like a product ... which surprisingly happens most often in the backwards shitholes when sex ed is a few decades or centuries behind.
>being part of a consumer community that creates demand for more is harmless
How does "a small issue compared to X" translate into "harmless" for you? Majority of child abuse doesn't have anything to do with CP.
>openly sexualising kids and flamboyant sexuality being beamed at them 24/7
Aka. not something that actually happens. Or do you consider a rare quasi documentary as open sexualisation of kids?
>People are products of their environment
Of course but the part of the environment that paved the way to inceldom is how sheltered people became. It has zero connection to sex. These people can't even hold normal friendships.

>>16362454
>You're the pedo for seeing anything children do as sexual.
It's not anything but it's performing sexual dances. It's inherently sexual you dense fucker.
> Anonymous 09/14/20(Mon)22:32:15 No.16362454▶

>>16362440 (You)
>Yes, and if you can you're a pedo
You're the pedo for seeing anything children do as sexual.

>Yes they were, that's the point. Otherwise the entire premise of "we're showing this to bring awareness to something that harms girls" falls apart, idiot.
>You don't appear to comprehend the concept of acting.
You seem to have no understanding on what that does to a child's development.

>>16362455
This is both baffling and pathetic. If you want to start an argument with me, have some sort of premise.I explained well enough if that post what I meant, obviously something I said has offended you.

>>16362423
Violence isn't politics when liberals do it, but if some lone right winger goes crazy then it is entire white male population of earth and their politics, views and beliefs that is at fault.

>>16362476
>That hit hard in my daddy genes.
I'm sorry you enjoy watching your daughter twerk. She deserves better.

>>16362476
>Of course it does, that's where the damn movie is from.
That's not what the argument was about, retard.

>>16362481
Any "sexual" connotation is attached by YOU, you sick fuck. You probably think a child doing a split is some sort of sexual invitation. Get help.

>>16362506
No, a child TWERKING is sexual you dense fucker. Not anything a child does is sexual. How can you be this retarded, seriously.

>>16362481
>>16362454
False premise. It doesnt even matter if you are attracted to them, its people who are and then justify it that are the problem. The old assumption was that man had natural urges which were harmful and should be overcome. We seem to think nowerdays that anything natural is good, and so we should simply not have the urge to do bad things naturally. The problem this creates is that when we do have these urges, we think "this is wrong so why do I want it?" which would not have confused a mind before our time. We are born with desires to do things we can reason are terrible, and so we dont do them. Its people who jusitfy it who create a problem

>>16362516
A dance is not "sexual" when a child does it, sicko.

>>16362440
>Yes, and if you can you're a pedo
I am sorry, I am from Europe, went to beach last month, many girls were topless or with skimpy bikini that haddly covered anything, many younger kids were just naked. Literaly no one cared or if they did they say or do anything to indicate and that is also fine, because thought crime is only illegal in north korea. Oh and those kids, boys and girls were traumatised for life.

>>16362486
Can't argue with that either. Fucking life it is, same for the towelheads slaughtering an entire journal office. At least )))we((( have values that couldn't be possibly attributed to killing and raping and blowing things up. No joke, western civilization was built on honor, duty and generosity. Why do you need to stay mad?
>>16362493
Seethe more, kid.
>>16362505
Being from Europe isn't an argument, you'll have to write more than a single line to get your point across. Go to sleep, you're drunk.

>>16362516
How the fuck is it sexual? It's just a way to dance, pedo-chan. Do you get turned on by it?

>>16361650
My wife

>>16362061
Holy shit seething beyond possibility

>>16362110
Very well said

>>16362480
>most molestation happens in the family
Ok? But you made a link between it and CP, you said its better we have one rather than the other. I argued they increase mutually. And I simply dont buy the whole consumption of CP does not create demand for more angle. Whos it being made for then? Its made for pedophiles to share around. I agree with your point about shitholes and sex education, but that isnt the only factor. Poverty and lack of police infrastructure/ care factors in. I mean look at the white march in belgium, a developed country where a bunch of witnesses were killed over high level child abuse. Or the same with that adoption thing in Germany, or pete skully selling abuse of toddler videos for hundreds of thousands of dollars (who has that kind of money?). Its a real example of a systemic issue that is not talked about in full honesty as much as youd think. The whole CP explosion happening threatens to undo progress.
>majority has nothing to do with CP
Again, a lot of being who end up abusing children first have convictions for CP, theres a link.
>nothing happens
I find this ignorant. See my first post about just how much CP is consumed now. Its going up, not down. Why?
>incels have no relation to sex
this is just dogmatism at this point, of course they do. The importance placed on sex is warping the minds of people who dont get it. You never see anyone say "sex isnt so important, work on other things", always "try harder and youll get sex" which just reaffirms their fucked up issue

>>16362535
>Why do you need to stay mad?
I am not mad, I simply disagree with your views about Cancel culture. It is a liberal thing, maybe you are a reasonable and intelligent person with reasonable liberal views, then you are one of tiny sane minority and do not represent liberalism that is currently destroying western world.

>>16362110
BASED

Girls that are 13 and above are to be married to start a loving family with, not sexualized and turned into prostitutes like in this shitty trash-tier movie.

>>16362597
I don't think anything about cancel culture though, it's just trash. Cheers, I'm done with this.

>>16362597
CancelCulture = white American rightwingers

Rightwingers want to cancel a film for bringing light to a problem they themselves are enabling.

>>16362113
>>16362113
>https://attackingthedevil.co.uk/pmg/tribute/index.php
completely disagree, you have no clue about what was happening during victorian period, read link above.

>>16362572
>beyond possibility
Kek, so much for the untolerant right.

>>16361620
how do so many fucking retards fall for such a shit bait

>>16362596
>a lot of being who end up abusing children first have convictions for CP, theres a link.
Of course there is, but the number of people who abuse children is just so, SO much higher than number of people who consume CP, it makes the whole focus on CP just simplistic "look, we're doing something" pandering. It's like the whole obsession with e-cars to deal with climate change, when the electricity comes from coal sources.
> Its going up, not down. Why?
It's easy and relatively safe. Is the number of child abuse actually going up? That's way harder to tell given how the majority is still a dark number.
>You never see anyone say "sex isnt so important, work on other things",
It tends to be the first advice. Problem is, incels don't accept it and rather want some playbook how to get laid. Something that doesn't happen with normal people who simply aren't that obsessed by sex.

>>16362696
People just want an excuse to bring up the subject of young girls and talk about young cunni

>>16362683
The existence of prostitution doesn't mean that the majority of the culture was sexualized

>>16362722
I don't know... there were probably a lot more active pedos then than there are today, also a lot more girls were having sex at young age. Children are sexualised nowadays but are they having sex with adults?

Why not rather study why is it so that pedophilia is taboo instead?

>>16362712
i have to go but i will reply later stating my full idea here, which I did not articulate well. I broadly agree with you though

>>16362722
>>16362781
Imagine prostitution being legal and not advertised on TV. Impossible...
Absolutely true, even plants have sex. It's the monetary relationship that creates prostitution, and the biological factor that creates sexualization.
Indeed, sexual relationships and marriage would happen a lot earlier than what is of custom today. >>16362785 I'd answer this, and again, the dad genes come into play. Sexualization isn't the matter, and what the film says is asking about how and why young girls are the object of desire when they just can't know any better. Same for the guys who finance this sort of shit or make a scene about it, there's something hidden deep.

>>16361620
>performative righteous indignation
The feminist conspiracy theory of oppression is a great example of this that you can see everywhere.

if lolita, gr, everyone knew of that french philosopher petition, the story of the eye, or 120 days by de sade was released today would it have the same response as cuties

>>16362785
Get fucked kike

>>16362061
This.

>>16361629
cwinge

>>16363361
No it wouldn't because no one reads anymore. Every normie has a netflix subscription

>>16361626
This. Film hasn't been out long for anyone to write a literal book.

>>16362526
>>16362506
>>16362542
Back to /tv/ please.

>>16366104
You should go back to your therapist if twearking kids turn you on. What's next, a dog wiggling it's tail is sexy too?

>>16366142
>Why are you provoked by provocation bro, is something wrong with you? Seek attention
Seeking attention is a woman's game

>>16366188
>kids dancing is provocation
Jesus, anon. Unironically seek help before you rape someone.

>>16366104
See a professional before you act out your fantasies and end up harming a child.

>>16362649
this
remember the satanic moral panics across the latter half of the past century?

>>16362597
>>16362649
>>16366321
>NOO!!! LEFT WING MORALISTS ARE BETTER THAN RIGHT WING MORALISTS!!!
>NOO!!! RIGHT WING MORALISTS ARE BETTER THAN LEFT WING MORALISTS!!!

>>16366340
>random twitter users who complain about something
>rightwing propaganda machine which made rules for Hollywood, print and music while also trying to censor works not pandering to them
Yeah, totally the same.

>>16366340
Take your meds, pedoschizo.

>>16366366
based myopic tribalist!