/lit/ - Literature

>>16329097
>The Patriarchy was chosen by God
lol
>there is reason the Bible tells us that a husband rules over his wife
Yeah because it was written 2000 years ago. Is/ought fallacy.
Shit thread, not /lit/.

>>16329097
have sex incel

>>16329131
>say lol
>no retort
It's /lit/ I linked a paper explaining how God and the patriarchy are linked
>>16329139
when?

>>16329164
>say dumb shit
>expect counterarguments and "debates"
Go "debate" with your shitty professors, retard.

>>16329234
What's dumb about it? Do you know anything about divine right?

>>16329097
>In Defense of Patriarchy
https://theimaginativeconservative.org/2020/08/in-defense-of-patriarchy-rv-young.html

>>16329293
I wrote my first, clear copy desu.

shutup faggot

>>16329330
>post an image
>mocks the person for "can't debate"
>say faggot and no argument against
well done

Can someone honestly explain the concept of patriarchy to me and how it is an actual theory and not just a hypothesis based on modern stereotypes? It seems to me that applying political equality outside of democracy is a bit dishonest. In a monarchy e. f. the monarch needs to be a powerful and persuasive individual, if a woman who tries to get into the position of power is being repressed and can't persuade or force out the ones above her in hierarchy, it directly follows that there is at least someone more powerful than her, so why should she be the ruler?

>>16329392
Well the patriarchy isn't the monarchy so

>>16329097
"Defending the Patriarchy" just shows how insecure you are lol
Have sex

>>16329097
You were fine until

>The Patriarchy was chosen by God, there is reason the Bible tells us

Some book written by desert people roughly 2000 years ago is not a solid argument. You're better off continuing your studies of the Greeks and Romans and then having real references in art and history showing how the anti-patriarchal tendency is naive and symptomatic of a poor education.

>>16329131
Is/ought fallacy
That's not a fallacy. Employing the is/ought dilemma as a fallacy would imply that morality shouldn't even be considered and people abandon it entirely.

>>16329097
Holy cringe

>>16329413
>insecure
uhh? what?
>>16329429
>>16329429
>the Romans instilled the patriarchy
>comment on how the Bible includes it
>lol point stupid, bible fag
retard
>>16329453
what part? did you read the paper or just go lol approves of patriarchy?

>>16329503
Have Sex

>>16329503
I didn't say the point was stupid. The Bible is just not the way to make it.

>>16329097
Are you a virgin? Be honest here, we don't judge

>>16329097
Holy based

>>16329444
Yes, it's Hume'a guillotine or the is/ought distinction. Not a fallacy itself. The naturalistic fallacy is somewhat related, I suppose.

>>16329566
I didn't make it with the Bible, did you read or just post with ignorance?
>>16329554
nice

>>16329611
>I didn't make it with the Bible
If you're OP you did. It's not even worth mentioning.

>>16329097
you really need to have sex, mate. chastity has fucked with your brains

Oh look, it's another 18 year old virgin thinks he has it all figured out thread.

>claim men are good
>get told to have sex every other reply
oi vey
>>16329731
yikes cringe post

>>16329731
based

>>16329756
wrong, mr 19 year old had sex once

>coping this hard against 6th wave feminism

>>16330226
feminism isn't mentioned once

>>16330226
we are on 15th wave sorry

>>16329164
>no retort
>Arguing against leap of faith shit
What's the point?

>>16330400
It's not "leap of faith" you didn't read it. You enjoy coming on here to pretend you are smart. It's basic Socratic teaching

>>16330400
There is another thing: - young men of the richer classes, who have not much to do, come about me of their own accord; they like to hear the pretenders examined, and they often imitate me, and examine others themselves; there are plenty of persons, as they soon enough discover, who think that they know something, but really know little or nothing: and then those who are examined by them instead of being angry with themselves are angry with me: This confounded Socrates, they say; this villainous misleader of youth! - and then if somebody asks them, Why, what evil does he practise or teach? they do not know, and cannot tell; but in order that they may not appear to be at a loss, they repeat the ready-made charges which are used against all philosophers about teaching things up in the clouds and under the earth, and having no gods, and making the worse appear the better cause; for they do not like to confess that their pretence of knowledge has been detected - which is the truth: and as they are numerous and ambitious and energetic, and are all in battle array and have persuasive tongues, they have filled your ears with their loud and inveterate calumnies.

- Socrates during his trial