/lit/ - Literature

>>16313625
>90% of posters vanish over night

>>16313632
>only animeposters remain

>>16313666
>tfw they cannot be rebuked anymore
God hates us

>>16313625
The captcha should be a moderately difficult analogy test question.

Does anyone else get the one where they tell you to select the parking meters but doesn’t let you submit until you also click the mailbox?

>>16313788
No

>>16313625
Yes, but it should filter anyone within the 90 and 110 spectrum. Send them to r ddit, where they belong.

>>16313788
For some reason I fail fire hydrants like 20% of the time. There's something in Google's concept of fire hydrants that doesn't match up with my own.

>>16313708
Back in the day I had a filter question for the chat on gay.com. Usually a simple problem or even just a basic question like who wrote which book. It did a great job of filtering out really stupid guys, but it also filtered out really hot guys.

Pretty much every guy who passed the test was fugly. Do we really want that many goblins walking our streets?

>>16313814
>implying IQs under 90 should be welcomed here
Fuck off. We already have too many.

>>16313788
I've started to click the images from the perspective of a bad image recognition algorithm. If it even vaguely looks like the object it wants to find, I'll click it. Passes 99/100 times.

>>16313837
Attractive people should be seen and not heard.

>>16313837

Us beautiful people can take advantage of being or playing dumb.

>>16313843
>he doesn’t know retards arrive at the same conclusion as geniuses by intuition alone
It’s time to sign up and get some upvotes, anon. We don’t want your kind here.

>>16313854
I guess, but the next time we have a "faces of /lit/" thread and you want to weep in anguish for all the repulsive creatures therein contained, you'll know who to blame.

>>16313878
In your dreams, brainlet.

>>16313878
This is just cope for people who share views with retards but don't want to be associated with them. Your views are dumb and dumb people share your dumb views for the same dumb reasons, just because you can articulate the reasons more clearly does not make them less dumb.

You don't need a high puzzle solving score to understand literature.

>>16314554
It doesn't have to be puzzles. Just test basic literary knowledge. "Who wrote 'Paradise Lost'?" Etc.

just need to wait it out until the brief flash of bizarre popularity this site as whole has had begins to wane. then, only the true, died in the wool weirdoes will remain. most importantly, all the teenagers will likely have fucked off someplace else, drooling at some schizoid's onlyfans i expect.

>>16313625
Why not astrological captcha?

>>16313814
So a question that is 105 iq like, what happens to x percent of vitamins/minerals you take?
A. Piss them out

If they answer correctly they get sent to reddit lolol. You only know which questions not to answer if you're not a redditor

>>16314636
Because we don't need anymore of u faggot geminis

>>16313625
IQ is meaningless I have 86 iq and I read Hegel.

>>16314753
It is, it's to keep out redditors and non readers

>>16314753
>I have 86 iq and I read Hegel.

Is there something surprising about this?

>>16314865
If you had a high enough iq to watch Rick and Morty you'd know well enough to answer your own rhetorical questions, dork.

but this has always been a low iq pseud board

>>16313625
>140 IQ
>still an autistic retard crossdressing femboy who just UwUs and OwOs online

I would be surprised if /lit/ wasn't averaging 110+, and it's probably one of the highest IQ boards on 4chan that isn't sci, but it doesn't make this board good.

^this post is bait^

>>16313832
Motorcycles aren’t bicycles either. Google doesn’t know shit about fuck

>>16313625
if you have to ask, you would never pass it