/lit/ - Literature

>you are supposed to be more wise than the rest of 4chan

lolno

hæters gonnæ hæt

you've confused knowledge with wisdom.

for a second I thought that was a pic of jose carreras

>>1627575
>"how is it said"

Your welcome

>>1627578
well i dont know, is the first time i enter here, but being a place in which literature is discussed and all that stuff, i though you will know about this,

>>1627583
sorry dude, my first language is not english, a stupid mistake

Inimici odio venenatis.

>>1627575
Contemno ire odio

>>1627608
really? hell it sounds good,
maybe a little pretentious

>>1627608
>>1627615
Venenatis isn't real latin. It's gibberish/filler.

>>1627612
>>1627608
which is the correct one?

how is it said " i pretentious" in latin?

>>1627612

>>1627622
Seems more right.

Contemno is to think meanly of, despise, condemn, hate, to defy
ire is the equivilent of "are going to"
odio is "hate"

>>1627634
thanks dude

>>1627628
I praetensus?

>>1627634
>ire is the equivilent of "are going to"
no

ire is "to go"

you need the verb for being somewhere in there

i don't even know if this can be said because the way we use "going" in english is idiomatic

you could keep contemno

but instead put ire in its indicative active present form and put hate in the dative or the locative.. i guess

>>1627643
Really you'd want an idiomatic cognate, but that's anyone's guess as to what that is.

>>1627649
that's true

oh wait contemno is a verb

what were you all thinking?

>>1627643
how would it be then?
hell i dont know shit about latin

>>1627639
praetensus means pretentious in latin?
what about electric boogaloo?

osor is "hater"

i was thinking

Osores viveunt abominare

"Haters living to hate"

best i could come up with

I found this:
http://latindiscussion.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=7070

>>Spanish also has "ir a hacer algo," and Italian uses "andare a fare qualcosa," which are both exactly analogous to the English construction as well. I think it would sound strange to Roman ears, although it probably wouldn't be difficult for them to figure out what you were TRYING to say. The best alterenative would be to use "esse" + future active participle. Sum scripturus liberum cras.

>>Ironically, I was just pondering a similar question: whether or not "esse" + present active participle could viably be used like an English present progressive.

>No. At least not in classical Latin. I've seen it occasionally in the Vulgate, so it may be more prominent in Latin of the later empire.

I think that sounds promising.

>>1627628
>>1627639
>>1627676

ego gloriosus

I don't want to help you show off how smart you are to whoever it is your trying to show off to

>>1627698
I'm sure he'll woo the crowds being able to say "haters gonna hate" and only that

also
>your trying to show off to
i doubt you know yourself

>>1627698
nah, i just want to know it for personal amusement and curiosity

>>1627709
dat an imperator class titan for epic scale?