[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 777 KB, 996x730, zhv7lwj3mgd51.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16265056 No.16265056 [Reply] [Original]

I've been doing a bit of reading on the economic aspects of Marxism, however it occurred to me that I don't know where to start with the more philosophical aspects. I've seen people post Stalin's, "Dialectical and Historical Materialism" and I've occasionally been recommended some works by Bukharin, however I really don't know what order would be best to understand concepts such as dialectical materialism or the base and superstructure or ideology, and so on. Could one of you anons help me figure out how exactly I should educate myself on such topics?

>> No.16265072

>>16265056
The only marxian literature you need is a special guide on tying nooses. Be sure to also review multiple autopsies of sucide victims seo that you can position the gun in your mouth adequately

>> No.16265120
File: 120 KB, 959x659, 960x0(2).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16265120

>>16265072
Why are you so dismissive about me wanting to read one of the most influential philosophers to have ever lived?

>> No.16265144

>>16265056
Start with Plato to understand dialectics

>> No.16265159

>>16265120
because he's a reactionary

discard all of his opinions

>> No.16265258

>>16265056

>the base and superstructure
Marx his Preface to the Critique of Political Economy (=/= Das Kapital)

>ideology
The first parts of the German Ideology

>> No.16265316
File: 341 KB, 704x669, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16265316

>>16265258
>t.

>> No.16265385
File: 62 KB, 678x198, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16265385

I tried asking /pol/, this was their response

>> No.16265394

>>16265120
Marx is a kike not a philosopher. get the fuck off my board tranny.

>> No.16265417
File: 13 KB, 255x191, 3f4b211c77cccd8991f1d0199d4223a4-imagejpeg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16265417

>>16265394
Aah yes, showcasing truly the pinnacle of intellectual discourse.
Back to >>>/pol/ faggot.

>> No.16265418

>>16265385
/pol/ is not a place for people with questions, it's a place for blind devotion to an answer
i am sympathetic to them but it's ridiculous how easily manipulated they are

>> No.16265425

>>16265159
Heinrich Marx was born in Saarlouis, with the name Hirschel Levi, the son of Marx Levy Mordechai (1743–1804) and Eva Lwow (1753–1823). Heinrich Marx's father was the rabbi of Trier, a role which his older brother would later assume.[1]

Shame you can't discard facts as easily

>> No.16265453
File: 169 KB, 592x572, 1466.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16265453

>>16265425
Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.

>> No.16266769

>>16265056
Jesus dude don't start with Stalin. Guy simply doesn't get Marx -- he reads Capital like a religious text, which makes sense because he was a peasant educated in a seminary.

Read Capital, and use a good reading guide (maybe David Harvey, although there are others if you don't like the way he writes (which I don't). No other secondary sources required.

Having a good base in Hegel is also advised, but here I would actually advise using a secondary source: the man himself is impossible to read without hating yourself. The Routledge companion is pretty legit.

>> No.16266784

>>16266769
Capital is a treatise of political economy, it doesn't really highlights Marx his philosophy.

>> No.16266792

Also, this is such a worthy endeavour. The economic aspects of Marx are empty without the philosophical dimension. I find his ideas incredibly elegant, precisely because of how he combines the two (even if I don't agree with them). Reading Capital is a genuinely elevating experience.

>> No.16266799

>>16266784
Have you read it, ESL?

>> No.16266802

>>16265425
Marx himself was pretty anti-jewish, as the greatest Jews always are
>>16265453
>a pseudointellectual pedophile who contributed nothing but egotistical wank to philosophy says antisemites are bad
>implying anyone will care
Sartre’s critique of antisemites was itself baseless and mostly constituted ad hominem, anti-antisemitism is refutable by looking at statistics of involvement in media and progressive movements

>> No.16266805

>>16266799
Only the first two chapters

>> No.16266824

>>16266802
>by looking at statistics of involvement in media and progressive movements
Doesn't tell us why jews are bad, retard. Satre is right, anti-semitism is just blaming everything on jews but even if you replace every jew with white europeans you don't solve any political problems.

>> No.16266832

>>16266802
Statistics of media and political involvement cannot justify antisemitism, in either a normative or a descriptive sense.

If Jews are disproportionately intelligent (which they are) then they will be over-represented in progressive movements and media (because people in influential positions in media and progressive movements are intelligent). Just as Jews are over-represented in science.

>> No.16266852

>>16265453
Anecdotes of a mescaline addled old pervert.
>>16266832
Explain how they're 25% of Russian billionaires vs. 0.11% of the population, sheer intelligence my ass.

>> No.16266860

>>16265453
>Never believe that trannies are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The trannies have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.

>> No.16266870

>>16265453
Not of fan of Sartre but he was 100% on point here

>> No.16266872

>>16265056
Though you should really ask leftypol for particular approaches to dialectical materialism and ideology, a comprehensive understanding of the former is granted by following the progression of thought in the major figures of modern philosophy (from Descartes onwards).

I can only vouch for my way, and that was by starting with Spinoza/Leibniz (to understand modes and principles), going through Kant's first critique (for his dialectic), learning Hegel's refutation of Kant, reading some Feuerbach, and finally understanding Marx's inversion of Hegel. It's a long reading list, but worthwhile for the knowledge itself.

>> No.16266900

>>16266832
Intelligence would not justify a tiny minority monopolising media and finance for their own benefit whilst claiming to be still oppressed. The rich are the larger problem, but if you cannot see that Jews are a disproportionately large part of that problem then you are blind.

>> No.16266907

>>16266852
With a sample size that small (99 out of a population of 144.5 million) the result is likely to be chance (also where did you get the 25% figure anyway?)

>> No.16266916

>>16266900
Please think before you post. If you cannot see the problems with this argument then you're not worth replying to.

Hint: Your reasoning is circular.

>> No.16266926
File: 116 KB, 624x624, CEB48455-E6C1-45A8-A7E8-AC07C296EB57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16266926

Never believe that Jews are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The Jews have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.

>> No.16267371

>>16265056
>words

>> No.16267379

>>16267371
You're on /lit/ retard, yes words

>> No.16267423

>>16267379
Yeah, words with multiplicity but without truth, substance, or even humor.

>> No.16267430
File: 48 KB, 500x386, 001_deleuze.jpg(mediaclass-landscape-large.1df3d6f438769113d26ed8577bc84d61afea2a7e).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16267430

>>16267423
>Filtered this hard

>> No.16267455

>>16267430
The only thing that would filter someone from that picture would be sheer boredom.

>> No.16267494

>>16267455
>he doesn't know about the difference between young and old Marx
Yep you got filtered, lurk and read more or go back.

>> No.16267522

>>16265453
that quote is from a pedophile but hey at least he isn't an anti semite

>> No.16267567

>>16267494
>he doesn't know about the difference between young and old Marx
What, that he 'broke from his humanism in his later writings'?

>Yep you got filtered, lurk and read more or go back.
I read the picture, and it wasn't complicated--just long. Only a midwit would find difficulty with it or even think some person would be filtered by it in the first place.

>> No.16267580

>>16265417
A marxist talking about intellectuall discourse is the equivalent of a criminal serving as a judge. There i no such hting as discourse with a marxist as he has already determined that just for entering a rebuttal you deserve to be starved, hung, imprisoned, labeled as insane or murdered in broad daylihgt. Hence any healthy society will pluck marxists like weeds from a garden.

>> No.16267591

>>16267430
>>16267494
>>16267494
>If you aren't familliar with the precise history of my world view its not because I am laughable or easliy dismissed but because you're inferior to me intellectually.

>> No.16267597
File: 201 KB, 516x470, 1596985925570.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16267597

>>16267567
>long
>3 short paragraphs
You sure are on the right board kiddo

>> No.16267607

>>16265056
Wheres the joke?

>> No.16267611

>>16267597
>try to make a meme
>3 paragraphs and no joke

>> No.16267613

>>16267580
>you deserve to be starved, hung, imprisoned, labeled as insane or murdered in broad daylihgt.
Wew, nice paranoia federal agent. Can you leave us alone?

>> No.16267625

>>16267591
No, you just got filtered like he said retard. Seethe harder

>> No.16267636
File: 29 KB, 679x516, 1584763184216.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16267636

>>16267607
>>16267611
>everything is a joke

>> No.16267661

>>16267636
>everything is a joke

concerning communism, yes.