/lit/ - Literature

>>16264613
larpnar basedbeard

>might makes right, based and redpilled


Noooooo what do you mean about a Chinese surveillance state and secret police

>might makes right


Why is 6ft tall Tyrone here

>might makes right


It doesn't count Germany was outnumbered both times

>ragnar redbeard

>>16264773
> this is definitely going on r/Conservative
thank you for the silver kind stranger

ITT: seething moralcucks

>>16264851
>ITT: seething moralcucks

>>16264851
I guess you don't have might anon

>pov you are a little girl who bumped into a might makes right reader

>might is right
>survival of the fittest

>>16264963
do americans really?

After a deep undercover operation I have managed to obtain a picture of OP

I cry everyday but God doesn't answer

>>16264613
I tried to read this and was utterly not convinced to waste my time reading whatever this was, I remember getting the distinct impression that it sounded like a ranting homeless old man, compared to what I usually read

Surely there is better material or literature on might is right or extreme darwinism

>>16265151
>Surely there is better literature on an massively retarded philosophy

>Replies: 28
>Posters: 8

>>16265204
>Yikes

>>16265173
I think its a very real philosophy people adhere to when I look at the world around me. "Extreme darwinism" or what this book is going in the direction of is something like how Devi described Genghis Khan as a man "in time" , someone who lives according to the metaphysical cyclical era of the dark age, therefore, they must embody the nature of violence in order to rule in the earthly realm, thus fully being a "man in time"

>>16265231
Would it just become a snake eating it's tail though. Even if the end goal had been reached of every man achieving his might potential, the definition of weakness would simply keep evolving

However if you go into Devi's work you'll realize its more complex than just 3 simple archetypes of man, so its also true its not fitting for our era to manifest "a man in time" such as Genghis Khan, however today it does not deny there are "men in time" , in fact, in my view, America is the number one definition of a "state in time" , where one must view the typical terrorist fighter of the Middle East as both a "man above time" however also a "man in time" , fighting with lightning and the sun, as unbelievable as it may be, however its true, terrorists are merely the continuation of Adolf Hitler, except in such a way that Hitler was only part of a timeless saga of light forces versus dark forces

>>16264963
Kekus Maximus

>>16265249
This is only true because of metaphysically, socially, physically and spiritually cyclical degeneration over time

>>16265249
This is only true because of metaphysical, social, physical and spiritual cyclical degeneration over time

I didn't like Ragnarr Redbeard before entering the thread, but judging by how much /leftypol/ hates him, he must be based.
>durr you have a moral responsibility to give a shit about my well-being
No. I don't.

>this one officer. This one right here

I don't even care about the book but I genuinely hope you cringecringebasedcringebasedbasedcringebasedcringecringecringe cucks choke on your vomit tonight

>definitive proof might makes right

>>16265634
Damn. Who knew Schopenhauer was a man of so many talents

ITT: The same few seething faggots who neither understand what might is nor what is meant by right

>>16264613
Why is this thread posted every single day?

>>16264613
Can someone tl;dr this without a political spin because the pseudonym alone means I'm never going to read it.

>>16265847
It's a descriptive idea, not a moral statement. People with power shape everything and the struggle for it is innate.

>>16265977
>descriptive
Soijack poster owned op

>>16264613
>Favorite
The racism and anti-semetism
>Don't like
The ideas