[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 41 KB, 620x387, 384885_GOLDMEMBER-_3317241b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16133061 No.16133061[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

>get into a discussion with a woman at work about philosophy, it's actually really stimulating for awhile
>end up talking about Hobbes
>so let me ask you, would you like to go back to the state of nature?
>tell her obviously not
>I guess not she says, the weak would be very vulnerable and at the mercy of the strong
>well I said, as Hobbes points out, that's already the case with states. Have you read Carl Schmitt?
>Mm, no, who's that?
>a German jurist
>what did he say about punishment?
>he was more meta, legality, legitimacy, that sort of thing
>I think I get it
>Oh really? Tell me
>state secret, she says.
>realize she doesn't know what she is talking about

Anyone else notice this? Women can sound intelligent when you first start talking but if you keep it up you will always find out they're autistic

>> No.16133069

have sex

>> No.16133070

>>16133061
>muh women
Back to /r9k/ with you.

>> No.16133081

>>16133061
what?

>> No.16133087

>>16133081
Sorry I'm tired formatting might be bad

>> No.16133089

>>16133061
Why would the average normie, even if its a woman, be well versed in Carl Shit?

>> No.16133114

>>16133089
She was pretending to be well read

>> No.16133119

>>16133114
Ah, well dont women basically pretend about everything,

>> No.16133121

>>16133061
You sound very dumb, OP. Also no one reads Schmitt these days except incels, so you can't expect her to know what you're talking about. The gulf between you and a healthy, young women is literally unbridgeable and you will never have sex.

>> No.16133122
File: 208 KB, 800x534, 1543790090682.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16133122

>>16133061
Why would you expect a random person to know or have read Carl Schmitt? Be happy that you could even talk about Hobbes.

>> No.16133125

>>16133061

Autism the post. She's just some hole you might like to fuck, and may or may not have redeeming personal qualities. Women are basically dwarfed men, get that through your head incel nerd. But oh woops, don't go rattling off about it! You have to keep it a secret otherwise you will look bad and ruin your reputation. The optimal strategy is to say one thing and do the next, as our culture is not currently grounded in reality

>> No.16133128
File: 88 KB, 742x882, 1589159348421.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16133128

>>16133121
You're worse than him.

>> No.16133130

>>16133125
>autism the post

>> No.16133132

So she called you weak.

>> No.16133142

>>16133130

I just described how most men relate to women, it is largely smoke and mirrors

>> No.16133148

>>16133121
>incel
>sex
>incel
>sex
>incel
>sex
arguingwithholes.jpg

>> No.16133174

>>16133132
If so she regretted it. She said if I was determined to get her to talk I would have to get pretty rough and I said you're already talking and then she realized how stupid she was

>> No.16133192

>>16133174
Oh did you just fuck that up majorly my man

>> No.16133204

>>16133128
>>16133148
Cope harder, incels.

>> No.16133217

>>16133192
Nah, she did

>> No.16133218

>>16133174
You should've said "how rough?"
This thread is still hella gay, though.

>> No.16133258

>>16133128
>fractional distillation tower
Finally my chemical engineering degree can be put to good use in interpreting memes.

>> No.16133272

>>16133061
Yep, I once had a girl tell me she'd read Plato but was sort shy about it, I said "really, you've read Plato?" with my head nodded down and my eyes in a sort of condescending look, smiling too, and she said she had also somewhat quietly(usually a very loud and talkable person). Eventually I got it out of her and she started talking about how much she loved just "like, asking these questions; about reality like justice and stuff", she said she had read the Republic, I then asked if she had read the Symposium(somewhat fitting the topic of love for a woman), I asked her another but she said she hadn't but all the other ones, I concluded she'd probably not read much and didn't want to embarrass her so I continued with the overall conversation. Wherein I just started flexing some of my knowledge verbally adjusted to what I guessed her level to be while being a bit beyond it for impressions, specifically speaking about his sense of hierarchy, "and that's another thing, you know, most of these people don't even ask questions like this, they are just the peasant classes like Plato said, and it's more so a genetic predisposition than choice, it's just their nature to be smaller" and so on, I was also partly testing her to see her capabilities, she then was amazed and wouldn't stop telling me about how I should become a professor and "the world needs people like you to like... give lectures and stuff" and did some spiel of which I had no interests in or herself and was jokingly rude and walked away from her.

>> No.16133281

>>16133217
No, you fucked up. See >>16133218 it was an invitation but you just showed her how autistic you are

>> No.16133294
File: 27 KB, 225x350, 114633.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16133294

>>16133174
No one is this unaware, surely?

>> No.16133297

>>16133061
She's not interested in your reading. She gave you a challenge implying weakness, you turned it into intellectual showboating. Next time continue the banter without getting defensive or insulted and you'll get better results.

>> No.16133306

>>16133272
Well done

>>16133281
She was insinuating I was weak

>> No.16133312

You sound like you spent that entire conversation waiting for her to slip up or reveal a lack of knowledge in some regard just so that you could make this thread. Wouldn’t you be happier forming a relationship with a woman who wants to learn and watching her become more well-read instead of bitching about the human imperfections of every woman you meet?

>> No.16133318

>>16133174
>>16133204
>>16133272
>>16133294
>>16133306
Judging by the poster count, these are all the same person, probably an anime poster interested in causing problems on our lovely literature board. I say we give them the same treatment we give all anime posters - the boot.

>> No.16133321

>>16133306
>She was insinuating I was weak
No, you're just too autistic to pick up on actual social cues.

>> No.16133334
File: 57 KB, 736x272, Screen Shot 2020-08-14 at 10.19.40 PM.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16133334

>>16133318
Maybe they're all OP except my post. He seems like a desperate incel type.

>> No.16133335

>>16133318
I'm the OP, only two are me, I hate anime it makes men trannies

>>16133321
Others had the same analysis of the situation as you can see

>> No.16133342

>>16133174
Retard thinks he's playing the hierarchy game but is playing the sex game instead. Loses. More news at 11.

>> No.16133345

>>16133335
>Others had the same analysis of the situation as you can see
If they're all autistic too that doesn't say much, you missed out bigly my guy

>> No.16133353

>>16133061
Anon, she didn't know something and didn't try to act like she knew about it. That trait is 1000x more indicative of intelligence than being a condescending autist.

>> No.16133354

>>16133335
Don't tell lies.

>> No.16133362

>>16133061
Your conversation would've gone better if you stuck to the topic of the latest YA

>> No.16133363
File: 268 KB, 540x705, 212421.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16133363

>>16133354

>> No.16133366

>>16133363
Anyone can edit these photos. Delete your thread and go back.

>> No.16133371

>>16133312
Honestly this. OP was looking for an excuse to degrade her intelligence the whole time. Most people on this board wouldn't even think women were capable of talking about Hobbes, but this wasn't enough for OPs standards.

>> No.16133381

>>16133371
Worse yet, girl was actually trying to flirt with OP but he just tried to one up her instead.

>> No.16133394

>>16133381
He probably blew his only chance, because even intelligent girls generally don't like that type of one-up-ing and directly competitive conversational style unless they're abnormally masculine. She wanted to fuck and OP proved he was an autist.

>> No.16133396

>>16133363
Delete your thread, incel.

>> No.16133403

>>16133394
This

>> No.16133430

>>16133061
>you havent read this fringe writer?
>wow you're dumb as fuck AHAHAHAHAHHAHAAH

>> No.16133431

>>16133394
She was the one trying to be competitive....

>> No.16133440

>>16133431
She literally wasn't, You might not have encountered it very often but that was pretty standard female flirting. It's a playful invitation for you to demonstrate that you're into her.