/lit/ - Literature

normie 'im different' book

>>16127440
I knew a girl who thought I was very inteligent and well-read, but I was too autistic to realize she was into me.

>>16127440
>minor in philosophy
>surprised anyone recognizes the french existentialists
>Camus is literally baby’s first

yes

>>16127440
this went big on twitter. comments are hilarious. the amount of cope, people explaining away Camus as niche, attacking those who are amazed at general ignorance. even if you are illiterate piece of shit, how the hell can you not encounter at least myth of S. at least as a metaphor in video game or film review.

>>16127469
Imagine sitting beside him and just gradually spreading your legs until..
Oops! You knock knees and then apologize to each other and for just a moment he smiles at you before going back to his book and you sink back into despair

>>16127467
kek

>>16127440
one time a woman slept with me because i said i was a marxist. what does it even mean to be a marxist in 2020 though

>>16127440
Most people I've slept with were attracted to me because they thought I was an "intellectual".

>>16127440
It actually did. If you are knowledgeable enough you can swoon women by talking about literature. Most of them are so ignorant they will think anything you say is intelligent as long as you are talking about a book/author.

I read books at work. This girl started wanting to "get to know me". I basically just talked about the nuances in Don Quixote and the struggles of translating some of this into English. After that she said we should "hang out". I fucked her soon after that. She literally went out to a book store and bought a bunch of philosophy books to impress me. She asked me what I thought of her purchases. I told her I hate philosophy and didn't really care for what she bought. We banged that night.

>>16127440
Yes absolutely, I've literally never taken a philosophy class but I've read about 45 philosophy books and some classics.

When I use them as part of conversation people think I'm a literal genius but I'm just spouting vaguely philosophical garbage. However I am also tall in shape & not ugly

Yes, but it was with another guy. Talked about Proust and that really impressed him

>>16127604
when i bring up philosophy as a part of a conversation people somehow misinterpret what i've said and then attack me. it's like watching a robot malfunction. i'm a manlet though.

>>16127440
Of course not.
Btw OP's guy is a pseud, even top models have read the stranger, it's definetely not niche.

>>16127440
Yes but the interest it has generated has also been responsible for some bad relationship choices. When people find something interesting, I used to mistakenly assume it meant they're interested in it themselves and have made/will make efforts to explore it themselves. When it's more often they like the idea of being interested in something and want the appearance and credit for that interest but don't find the process of developing it at all enjoyable.

And then at a certain point - since these are people who regard themselves as intelligent only because they want to be interested in 'intellectual' things - they become self-conscious about their own ignorance relative to someone who knows anything more than them. And this leads to several levels of relationship issues.

>>16127552
>what does it even mean to be a marxist in 2020 though
See global capitalism as a failing system? See the people's labor as pointlessly generating wealth for child-molesting lizards? See something unsustainable with the power dynamic? Not that hard. How could you not be in 2020?

>>16127440
Yes, talked about Jack London with a Russian woman. Russians love Jack London.

>Camus
>Existentialist

>>16127665
Yeah, both of them sound so wrong.

>>16127654
idk man i'm reading some baudrillard right now and he's saying that we can't even call what was happening in fucking '05 capitalism anymore

>We can even forget about capital and capitalism. Didn't they reach the point where they would destroy their own conditions of existence? Can we still speak of a "market" or even of a classical economy? In its historical definition, capitalism presided over the multiplication of exchanges under the auspices of value. The market obeys the law of value and equivalency. And the crises of capital can always be resolved by regulating value.
This is no longer true for the financial flows and international speculation that far surpass the laws of the market. Can we still speak of capital when faced with an exponential strategy that pushes capital beyond its limits in a whirlwind of exchanges where it loses its very essence and is

dispersed in an unbridled circulation that brings che very concept of exchange to an end?
Having lost its rational principle, the principle of value, exchange becomes total just as reality, having lost its reality principle, becomes total reality. h may be the fatal destination of capital to go to che end of exchange-toward a total consumption ofreality. In any case, we are bound for this gen eralized exchange, this frenetic communication and information that is the sign of hegemony.
The dimension of hegemony is different from that of capital and different from the dimension of power in its strictly political definition. It is no longer a question of political power tied to a his cory and a form of representation. Representation icself has lost its principle and the democratic illusion is complete. Not through the violation of rights but through the simulation of values and che derealization of all reality. The masquerade again, everyone caught in the signs of power and communing in the rigged unfolding of the political stage.

in this same work he says critical thought has lost all negativity and is absorbed by hegemony. so what does it even mean to be a marxist anymore?

>>16127654
idk man i'm reading some baudrillard right now and he's saying that we can't even call what was happening in fucking '05 capitalism anymore

>We can even forget about capital and capitalism. Didn't they reach the point where they would destroy their own conditions of existence? Can we still speak of a "market" or even of a classical economy? In its historical definition, capitalism presided over the multiplication of exchanges under the auspices of value. The market obeys the law of value and equivalency. And the crises of capital can always be resolved by regulating value.
>This is no longer true for the financial flows and international speculation that far surpass the laws of the market. Can we still speak of capital when faced with an exponential strategy that pushes capital beyond its limits in a whirlwind of exchanges where it loses its very essence and is
dispersed in an unbridled circulation that brings che very concept of exchange to an end?

>Having lost its rational principle, the principle of value, exchange becomes total just as reality, having lost its reality principle, becomes total reality. h may be the fatal destination of capital to go to che end of exchange-toward a total consumption ofreality. In any case, we are bound for this gen eralized exchange, this frenetic communication and information that is the sign of hegemony.
>The dimension of hegemony is different from that of capital and different from the dimension of power in its strictly political definition. It is no longer a question of political power tied to a his cory and a form of representation. Representation icself has lost its principle and the democratic illusion is complete. Not through the violation of rights but through the simulation of values and che derealization of all reality. The masquerade again, everyone caught in the signs of power and communing in the rigged unfolding of the political stage.

in this same work he says critical thought has lost all negativity and is absorbed by hegemony. so what does it even mean to be a marxist anymore?

>>16127677
It means to be a part of an identity cluster that defines your spending habits in the market.

>>16127440
>be me
>buy Ikea shelf directly from the outlet
>shelf is already set up in the showroom
>a bit old, so 50% off
>employer wants to pack it in the van in pieces
>tell him to leave it as it is, even with the book dummies in it
>fast forward
>new shelf is in my flat in London
>old books are still in Brussels
>decide to leave book dummies in it, so it doesn't look empty
>fast foreward
>tinder date comes to my flat after dinner
>takes a glimpse at my books and compliments me how cool they look
>"bet you read a lot, anon."
>start quoting lines from Romeo and Juliette that Shakespeare never wrote
>invent French authors that never lived
>tell her about universities I never been to
>compare her to main characters who don't appear
>we do things I know from 50 Shades of Grey, the movie, of which I have only seen a trailer
why do you bother reading, guys?

Classic status mismatch. He's obviously from some background where even having heard of Camus is high status (prob 1st gen college graduate, hence his picture) while she's from one where (at least pretending to) know all about such things is the bare minimum to hang

Tl;dr guy tries to impress extremely online girl with knowledge that impresses others in his own environment but leaves those in hers cold, "look at this cognitive peasant, he thinks hes people" is bad form so the thing is recast in woke light to eliminate risk of looking elitist

He is then put on blast in front of thousands online, ostensibly because he's a man talking down to a woman, but the replies don't even bother to keep up that kayfabe and instead full on display the status disparity nature of it

>>16127440
How the fuck can you be "reading" The Stranger? Shit's like 150 pages. That's like 2 hours of reading; absolutely no reason not to read that in one go.

>>16127524
Fag

>>16127704
>>16127696
sorry i deleted and reposted to get the greentext better, still missed a line.

>It means to be a part of an identity cluster that defines your spending habits in the market.
not sure if you're the same guy but pretty much, yeah. based

>>16127552
Being a Marxist in 2020 is about scrolling Twitter, and if you feel like pushing yourself, reading half a Wikipedia article about some obscure ideology so you can feel intelligent. Marxists today don't read, all they care about is filling the void of their lives with an "identity".

>>16127735
painfully accurate

>>16127722
What really gives it away is the graduation picture as the profile picture. Imagine thinking graduating university is an achievement.

>Met girl on tinder
>play as normie because most girls find it boring when I talk about books or anything other than partying, drugs and alcohol
>Tells me she loves reading
>don’t dive too deep into it because I don’t want to seem pretentious
>Follow her on Instagram
>posts stories like>>16127469
>a bunch of fiction/teen fantasy books

Honestly I went turbo autism and felt like I had nothing to talk about with her

>>16127761
Anon women who read good books and understand them are unicorns. Find a girl who's willing to listen to your views. You can do the reading and then say the size what youve read into simple coherent arguments that you can tell to her. It will have a much more desirable effect.

>>16127807
Synthesize not say the size

>>16127654
Cringe

>>16127725
Maybe he is reading it in French.

>>16127440
>>16127467
for someone who's aware of the existentialists and has heard of Camus, but has never bothered reading them, can any of you convince me?
what of value did the existentialists say? why should I read them?

>>16127440
>Surprised anyone knows of Camus
Imagine spending more than a week with her. Your irony would reach its peak.
>>16127837
>Can someone pay some attention to me please?
No go fuck yourself obnoxious summer fag.

>>16127837
Leave this board and never come back

>>16127837
if you care about truth, objective reality and intellectual honesty they're worthless.

>>16127837
No philosophy has any value; it's entertainment for the antisocial

>>16127722
Nah this guy is probably the "smart" guy in his frat and that's why he thinks Camus is obscure

>>16127568
This is so false. Women don't give a fuck unless you are good-looking, but reading books gives women a passable excuse to convince themselves that they are not fucking you out of shallowness or vapidity

>>16127654
Those are far-right talking points aswell, if not exclusively.

>>16127721
You have never done that

>>16128003
> Those are far-right talking points aswell
Yeah, but the far-right iteration of these talking points is extremely shallow and retarded. The right has no structural critique, and no economic alternative. There's no rightist version of Marx, no fascist economists. They are lost in an endless culture war.
> if not exclusively
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA oh brother

>>16128008
>pic related
pic relates

>>16127440
Vidya yes, literature no. Strange new world.

>>16128014
Yeah, and marxist one is extremely out-dated, the main claim that capitalism is gonna fall under its own weight turned out to be false

>>16128059
Marxism is a mode of analysis more than a historical prediction. Rightists think they're so smart when they say "ooohh hooo Marx failed to predict the future!!!" when everyone is over that already. He never intended his shit to be viewed like some Nostradamus bullshit. See: all neo-Marxist and post-Marxist economists for the last sixty or so years.

>>16128003
this

>>16128078
So now you are talking about neo-marxism and post-marxism, which differ a lot from marxism which is what we were talking about.

>>16128078
Serious "rightists" are Marxists.

>>16128078
I'm sure that medieval priests thought they were very smart because they also had a book to quote from that nobody else read, with very flexible prophecies contained therein. Just roll the dice and you can find an applicable verse that proves whatever you'd like to say is right.

>>16128014
>They are lost in an endless culture war.
You say, as though the economic alternative proposed by leftists will manifest itself in a sustainable way even though global capital opposes it, even in regions where communism is the proclaimed state ideology.
The vast majority of electorally ‘viable’ positions left wingers hold are standard social democrat stances. Stances which are being rotten away in Europe, where socdem foundations are being replaced by (fiscal) liberalization.

Many realize that the economic alternative you mention are, at this point, a pipe dream (good luck starting a revolution in western nations with militarized governance), no matter how many zer0 books you read. Leftism has itself, in practice, devolved into ‘an endless culture war’.

I suspect that these threads are made by Horia Belcea. There is one poster who obsessively harasses anyone who disagrees with him in exactly the same way that Horia Belcea did in his SOTOATS threads, and these threads are being spammed in exactly the same way those threads were too. We should all just stop replying to them or start calling Horia out on his bullshit.

>>16127722
>an intelligent and perceptive post on /lit/
I'll be dammed

>>16127440
Both of these people are cunts, the guy for being a total pseud and the girl for being an attention-seeking whore and posting a private conversation on twitter. However I gotta give it to the whore; why was the pseud so incredulous of the whore reading the book? He cornered himself with the condescending way of phrasing his messages. This is how it's gone if he didn't pretend he was more well-read than her:

>Pseud: haha I'm reading camus's the stranger
>Whore: haha yes thank you, I've read it
>P: that sounds awesome, what did you like about it?
>W: I didn't like much meursault's purely apathetic character but his execution wasn't justified. I also liked marie's depiction
>P: oh I wouldn't call meursault's purely apathetic but that's fine. I think we agree on his unjustified death and I also liked marie's depiction
>W: yeah you're right
>P: so I'm going to the beach with my homies, you can come along if you want to
>W: I've something to do sorry
>P: that's fine
>W: well you know what?
>P: no what lol?
>W: I think I can reschedule it, I'll head to the mall and get me some swimsuit.
>P: awesome! don't forget your sun cream, Whore
>W: sure, Pseud. What's your snapchat btw?

And the rest is history: She sent him some swimsuit pics, they went to the beach, the pseud fucked the whore, and no Arab was killed.

Women have shit taste in general, so no.

>>16128195
did he ask her to go to the beach so he could shot her when the sun hits his eyes?

>>16127464
these lying whores can't even tell that I'm a fucking retard! As soon as they start complimenting me like that I'm out.

The Stranger is taught in fucking HS literature classes.

>>16128162
This is a valid critique of my positions. Indeed, I recognise the challenges of holding revolutionary outlooks, and much of what you describe (there being no "horizon" beyond capital, if you will) is outlined in detail in Mark Fisher's Capitalist Realism (haha at the zer0 books reference). As silly as it sounds, I believe that despite this, one has to hold an optimistic outlook and actively seek out fissures in the system; indications of a future beyond the horizon. Because the alternative is to sink into nihilism, and this is why I think that the far-right is much worse. The far-right, by not even paying lip service to an economic alternative let alone truly believing in one, implicitly capitulates to the loss of a future and loses itself in a miasma of nihilism. But I contend that the USSR was once seen as inevitable and it collapsed in a week; the great monarchies of Europe were seen as impenetrable before they fell one after another in the space of a few years. History teaches us that what seems endless is often far from it.

>>16127665
>NO MOM IT'S CALLED ABSURDISM AND IT'S COMPLETELY DIFFERENT UGH YOU JUST DON'T GET IT!!!

>>16128207
No, no casualty that day. The sun bothered him a bit but he got one of those beach umbrellas that look like a tent; in fact that's where he fucked her. That day they also made plan for a date the following week.

>>16128195
god i hate pseuds

not when you starting talking about the fact that the "accident" in lolita was clearly an inside job.

>>16127980
You'd be surprised at how well-read some frats are, at mine we had a lot of people who were big into medieval chivalric poetry.

>>16127568
Thats bullshit, but i believe it.

>>16127909
>>16127923
>>16127932
>>16127964
I had no idea the question was so controversial.
Two people telling me the existentialists are not worth reading, and two existentialists - not being able to explain why they are worth reading - telling me to piss off.

>>16127440
>surprised anyone recognizes one of the most mainstream schools of philosophical thought

pls kill me

>>16127440
I have gotten laid after sperging out about Melville but that's probably in spite of it

>>16127440
yeah, this girl sent me her instagram and she had the stupid fucking whitman "I am multitudes" quote that every arty girl has but unattributed and I think recognizing it was whitman fast tracked my getting pussy. she was a lit major and a commie so we then talked about marx and other shit and i guess i passed her standards. she was cute and had big tits, was a nice time for a while

>>16127837
heidegger is the best existentialist and he's not even an existentialist

>tfw can't stop pseuding
I can't commit to any philosophy because I fear coming off as a pseud by not understanding the philosopher as well as I think I am. I kept walking into this trap of being overexcited and thinking I have found absolute truths only to regret it afterwards. How do I form solid stances?

>>16127483
I knew several people who haven’t heard of him, teachers in school

>>16128450
oh yeah, being and time is on my reading list, probably won't get onto it for a few months.
my main reason for wanting to read him is this petite cougar with fantastic tits showed me her dissertation on him and I wouldn't mind shagging her after covid lockdown

>>16127440
memeing about judith butler got me laid so i guess i can say her works aren't totally useless

>>16128457
>I kept walking into this trap of being overexcited and thinking I have found absolute truths
This is learning, anon

>>16128500
kek. checked. dubs fit perfectly.

>>16127987
Based, succinct and accurate analysis.

>>16127722
double dubs of completely true

>>16127440
No, but Warhammer has. Now I'll never have wizard powers.

>>16127632
>when i bring up philosophy as a part of a conversation people somehow misinterpret what i've said and then attack me
>No, I said I want a glass of juice!

The ulysses, it was totally worth it.
Also deleuze.

no but it got me Iliad

you aint getting laid nigga.

>>16127440
Academia is so fucking dead. They're only pumping out retards these days.

Why did this Tweet go big? I'm so confused.

>>16127469
>ywn be a parisian antinous reading in the tube
why even live

>>16127440
>my personal philosophy

That is the most embarassing part.

>>16128811
Academia can't make someone more intelligent, you can't tell them to do the impossible. It's just more people are going into further education

>>16128702
CARLOS

>>16127440
>bragging about the stranger
Jesus I remember reading that book during lunchbreak at mcdonalds when I was 16.

>>16128900
>Academia can't make someone more intelligent
I disagree, the whole point of academia was to teach people fundamental skills that will help them improve their thinking. The main skills are reading, writing, speaking and listening. With those four refined, you can pretty much learn anything and thereby increase your intelligence. But they don't really teach that anymore. Instead of showing people HOW to think, they just teach them WHAT to think. That turn in academia was enough to kill it. There are of course small groups of professors who are still good, but overall it's garbage. It seems to function mainly as a propaganda center for the neoliberal bourgeois elite. They won't dare teach anything deeply or seriously because their hollowness will be exposed. Hence why OP's pic related seems to think the French existentialists are super obscure; she received only a very shallow education. It's actually quite sad.

>>16128338
I'm sure it's different at different unis but I went to University in the American South and the frat boys were all dumb fucks. The "smart" ones would be just like the guy in OP. Graduation pic as profile picture, thinks the most high-brow literature in the world is Ernest Hemingway and that Camus is obscure, extreme overconfidence in their intelligence due to getting B's in business classes and being surrounded by people who are even stupider than they are

>>16127524
Imagine sitting beside him and just gradually spreading your legs until..
BANG! You break both your and his kneecaps from the extreme collision of you knocking your knee against his. He screams in pain for a few moments, you grab his book and slink away in despair.

>>16127721
based non-reader
>>16128008
fag

>>16127440
Camus? More like anus. French fuck.

Yes, on dating apps I mostly ended up with the sorts of girls who have twitter accounts where they type all in lower-case and pretend to read Hegel.

They are generally very stupid. I embarrassed myself with more than a few girls in hindsight because I actually wanted to talk about our mutual interest in "read theory" type subjects. It was almost as if they were saying "why are you continuing to talk about this, even though I've already let you get to the date stage? We're supposed to talk about food and 'what you do for fun', now." But I figured if I'm on a date with someone who claims to be big time into Derrida, won't shut the fuck up about Derrida, and all of our initial cringe banter was about mutual interest in Derrida, she's going to want to talk about something related to Derrida at least a little bit.

I don't know if you guys have this experience too, but you know that thing where a woman talks a big game about her interests and pretends to be edgy and self-assured, until the moment she decides you've passed her tests and you're "in," and then she immediately becomes passive and submissive, almost like she wants you to condescend to her? Like she's saying "congratulations I don't really read Deleuze, you can now talk down to me because you do." I don't understand that. I guess I'm a fag but I don't want to spend 4 hours with a blustery retard whose interest in things is only a temporary front for finding a guy to talk down to her.

The only girls who actually knew about the things they claimed to be interested in were the Marxists with huge jugs. Small titty Marxists were invariably fake, boring skinny bitches who just wanted clout. In my experience, a woman oblivious to her jugs is usually a woman autistic enough to learn something for its own sake and not because twitter told her to.

All of this wants me to commit sudoku, but then again a relationship between a man and a woman is not about mutual interests, it's about compatibility .

>>16127440
>when I was in college I sold used books to get a bit more cash
>one girl bought a lot of them
>hey these books are good.. do you have some time off? Maybe we can talk about them
>panicked and tell her that I better go
To this day I am not sure if she was hitting on me or trying to harvest my organs, more since I was a fat retard with greasy hair.

>>16127721
kek

>>16128234
this. I know I'm a pseud, and to pretend otherwise is insulting.

Namedropping the Neoplatonists got me laid once
Not even explaining what they believed, just vaguely mentioning Plotinus and Proclus (at that point, I didn't even know who Iamblichus was)
Also, I can't do it quite well but a friend I met in uni goes to an island in our country and gets high quality pussy by name dropping Marxists and Max Weber

>>16129509
I think the guy's success with Marxism and Weber is really noteworthy because he's like 5'7, has a massive nose and isn't exactly buff

>>16129526
I know a really short nigga who knows like 10 languages and has lots of eclectic interests and he gets absolutely amazing pussy regularly, fucking mirin'

>>16128184
sad thing is that its lifted from twitter

https://twitter.com/acczibit/status/1293879823799070723

>>16127722
Marquis de Posade?

>>16127440
it has both gotten me laid and no second date pwned
cliffs:
one line of poetry or couplet can do wonders if it actually fits the conversation
never, ever mention evola on a first date with a grad student

>>16127440
I once got a date on Tinder by telling a girl that I was into philosophy. She said we should hang out so I could teach her more but, even though I did bring three books, to the pub we only had sex that night.

>>16129623
>>16129643
well, that was a disappointment

No, closest they've gotten me is a really close friend who is now making me tutor her in German, French, and Philosophy.

Six years ago I met my now wife via a /lit/ tinychat group, so, I guess so yeah

>>16127440
no

>>16127440
I fucked a couple of my profs with it

>>16130356
Fake, but based.

>>16127735
grim, but true. I have personally met such "marxists" through involvement in the british labour party, total larpers

>>16129643
lol reminds me of his tweets too now you point it out

>>16130987
they've made Labour unelectable. How the fuck do you lose safe seats you've held for a fucking century?
oh yeah that's right call the constituents a bunch of racist uneducated misled idiots. as a leave voting don valley constituent, Emily Thornberry has personally called me stupid. fucking hag.

>>16128457
By getting older.

>>16130987
Any horror stories from Labour? As an outsider it seems like a complete shitshow

>>16128338
What school?

>>16131088
no horror stories myself as I've deliberately avoided political discussion with anyone who gives off the momentum corbynite smell.
whose bright fuckin idea was it to base party policy on the pontifications of ash sarkar and owen jones, instead of listening to their constituents? fuckin mongs.

>>16127440
That's the lamest literature discussion I've seen in a while. And I browse /lit/.

>>16127761
All girls my age do is talk about drugs. I should be selling e or coke, would get so much puss.

>>16127483
lots of people know about camus in my country but bc a popular anime character had his name as an homage

>>16127722
Well read.

What if he said Baudrillard or Derrida

>>16131488
Red flag

>>16131511
Deconstruction is strategtically useful, Derrida is based

>>16131488
W-What if he said Zizek? Asking for a friend I swear.

Found this gem in the twitter thread

>it's hard to think of anything more elitist than having the opportunity to go to college and then studying philosophy

/lit/ eternally btfo

>>16131586
Nigga you just admitted to using twitter, you were btfo'd from the start

>>16131586
>implying I'd drive myself into tens of thousands of [your national currency] of debt
>implying I don't just spend a few hundred a year on books
>implying I'm not an autodidact
there's nothing more elitist than being privileged enough to go to college and wasting that opportunity on an intersectional social studies class discussing social disadvantage.

>>16131584
You don't KNOW Zizek???

Wow how can clueless can peasants be lmao, you LITERALLY have youtube right? wow

I would've figured knowing the gist of a few Stephen King novels would go further than trying to talk philosophy

>>16127654
you will never pass

My freshmen year of college, I went on a school trip to Florence. On about the second or third day, they took us to see David at the Galleria dell'Accademia. Once our tour ended, they let us saunter around for an hour or so. In that time, I had taken a seat next to the statue and pulled out a book I had brought with me. Then this beautiful girl I’d been eyeing approached me and sat beside me. We remarked on David’s physique and joked around for a little and then she gestured toward my book and asked me what I was reading. I told her Big Sur, and she laughed because incidentally, her uncle had once worked with the Kerouac House in Orlando, where she was from. We began spending more time together throughout the trip just exploring Florence and would even take some time to go out somewhere and read together, or beside one another, really. A week after our first meeting, I lost my virginity to her. The following year, she took me to meet her folks in Orlando. She actually ended up taking me to go see the Kerouac House, which warmed my heart. Six years later, we’re still together.

>>16127735
i have a «marxist» friend, and i asked him about Das Kapital, which he replied that «nobody reada because its super hard and boring». Sums it up nicely.

>>16131703
Based Kerouac getting anons poon from beyond the grave.

>>16131703
cute if true

>>16129180
Kek

>>16129180
Twitter really has been poisonous to us. Hell social media as a whole, everything is just a front to look better for first impressions, but nobody has any interest in learning/doing something thoroughly because they dont recognize the benefits of actions that only affects the individual. Its sad really.