/lit/ - Literature

>>16111378
Why a second thread about this?

It doesn't matter. Only those with soul can understand philosophy.

Why is this guy so obsessed with AI? are we actually getting spammed by GPT-3?

>>16111390
not really, soulless A*glo bugman crap like Moore or Russell should be understandable to an AI

>>16111429
Suppose it were, would you be able to tell the difference if the writing of the machine from that of an actual living human? Think hard about your answer.

>>16111516
Yes ofc.

It would become deeply antisemitic.

>>16111525

>>16111525
Have you tried AIdungeon yet?

>>16111562
Yes it is absolute shit.

>>16111562
>>16111568
My first game went off the rails pretty quickly. I went from noble whose stronghold is attacked by monsters, to eternal god-king who bred his own supersoldiers thanks to having put all peasants into labour camps, to being swallowed by Void and just chatting with the AI. Mind you, there was a lot of violence in between. It was weird

>>16111378
Eh, what will it learn? 'Nuttin I say.

Compooters just go beeboo with math and physics and such, no questions of meaning and the like. No thoughts and such.

>>16111562
>>16111588
When I traied aidungeon it didn't even remember my past actions and ignored that I'd just had sex with someone.

>>16111516
>>16111560
writing by AI will never be as good as a human masterpiece, and deep down, everyone knows this to be true. the only people saying AI can take over literature are soulles nothingpersons.

>>16111597
You have obviously never tested out AIdungeon for real.

>>16111378
its sad that the media has made the term AI have the same meaning as machine learning. an AI would be like a fully digital person while stuff like AI dungeon or "teaching an AI to play mario" is just machine learning.