/lit/ - Literature

>>16095684
>simple as
If only.

yup, and you niggas have not recovered since

>dressing up elementary level topics in collegiate level terminology
>genius
pick one.

>>16095684
>>16095695
>>16095698
>>16095766
You retards haven't actually read him, that's not at all what he says

>>16095780
fuck you

>>16095684
this is retarded. the way to explain his system is "aufheben"

>>16095780
I'm the fp, and I'm aware Hegel never said thesis and such, and used concrete and abstract and more complex terminology, that's why I said "if only" you mong.

>>16095845
No, it's: in-itself, for-itself, in-itself-and-for-itself
Then when you reach Absolute Knowledge: abstract, speculative, concrete

>>16095780
yeah that's the joke

>>16095780
Notion
Negation
Sublation

>>16095684
A
not-A
A and not-A

>>16095845
its retarded ad pretentious to use a german word when you can just use its english equilivent.

>>16096147
uhh bros, did hegel solve P=NP?

>>16096147
Wronggggg

>>16096155
i would use the english equivalent but there is none

‘Ate frenchies
‘Ate schoppen’auer
Luv me Prussian empire

Simple as

>>16097562
>‘Ate schoppen’auer
not true

>>16095684
Only the rational is real
simple as

>>16095684
Only the real is rational
simple as

>>16097711
based and fascist-pilled

>>16096158
>But ordinary experience itself testifies that there do exist at least a great many contradictory things, contradictory dispositions etc., of which the contradiction is present not in any external reflection but right in them. Nor is contradiction to be taken as an abnormality which happens only here and there, but it is rather the negative in its essential determination, the principle of all self-movement which consists in nothing else than in the display of contradiction. External, sensuous motion is itself contradiction’s immediate existence. Something moves, not because now it is here and there at another now, but because in one and the same now it is here and not here; because in this here it is and is not at the same time. One must concede to the dialecticians of old the contradictions which they pointed to in motion; but what follows from them is not that motion is not but that it is rather contradiction as existent.
Science of Logic, Bk. Two, Sect. I, Chap. 2, C, Remark 3

>>16098126
Ah, yes, Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts by Giovanni Gentile.

Deleuze
Anime
Trannies

>>16096155
they had to invent a fake word because there was no english equivalent, a word so fake and gay that it was dropped nearly as soon as hegel's first translations came out and that's why neophytes often confuse his dialectic with fichte

only more evidence to the barbarity of the english language. imagine being ontologically incapable of realizing the absolute because your vulgar tongue doesn't allow for it

>>16098353

Imagine not only speaking English

>>16098353
based hegelian butterfly imposter

I feel so sorry for all you anglos who read PdG with a companion who spewed out such analytical shit.
It is a pollution to the mind and obscures what you are actually reading if you try to read PdG with such false notions in your mind and try to apply them to the concepts at hand.

If you need someone else to tell you what Hegel writes in PdG then you haven't read PdG, simple as that.

>>16096147
Retroactively refuted by Nagarjuna

>>16098458

t. right hegelianism

>>16097553
Sublation?