/lit/ - Literature

/Beans General/

>>16075304
B A S E D

And this leads me to my actual question since I really need an outside look on this or someone to just tell me anything about this. (I went to and tried talking to a school psychologist about my mind changing like this but he just gave me an anxiety calendar further leading me down to thinking my belief is correct). Am I becoming mentally ill or is almost every person in contemporary time around me mentally ill, blind to the superstructure and the possible infinity surrounding it?
Almost don't want to post this now after writing it but I feel so alone about this all so I'd just appreciate an outlook on it.

>>16075304
Bean poster, saving threads that need to be saved
>>16075301
Go and die you schizo faggot

Have sex. Unironically.

>>16075301
you're wrong

>>16075304
I fucking love beans bros

>>16075304
lets gooooo

>>16075301
this sounds fun
ride it out

>>16075309
any knowledge of a superstructure as i imagine you interpret that is impossible. same with infinity, though you aren't wrong there in the fact that you only regarded it as "possible". though when you use language you've already subjected yourself to necessary universal falsehood, in application to all things including this reply

>>16075309
>is almost every person in contemporary time around me mentally ill, blind to the superstructure and the possible infinity surrounding it
This one. You‘re becoming aware. It‘s good.

>>16075309
>>16075344
its fun attempting to articulate this so im giving a second reply here. what is your philosophy predicated on? language? logic? however you want to put it, ask the following question, what is your language or your logic based on? if no reliable answer can be given, there is no reliable answer at all

>>16075389
visually represented set theory applied to reality. So the paradox can't touch it since it would be inconsistent with reality. Reaching an outside view, seeing all these things as they really are here (here as in this superstructures environment) and not in a mind (substructure), things as in numbers, objects, technology, processes, human thoughts, etc. With an unknown outside superset above this superstructure. I'm not really proposing a formalization, rather just a tool to escape ones own false interpretation.
Otherwise, I become a child and I exist, my mind from a functional perspective is what it does, I go to school and am taught without being taught the metacognition itself underlying it, the process of thought and axioms taken to be true underneath that which men made to come to these conclusions are hidden in the superstructure which is our shared perceived environment. A mind existing in itself or its own substructure as a subset of the superstructure becomes mentally ill without origin only going further and deeper in, impossible for it to understand the things found in the superstructure above without its own mind going to it.
Example of mentally ill and relevant substructure thought is
>I see you are doing x, just like in dy (dee-why, small part of y)
or rather you are baking a pancake? Just like in the television show dy (small part of y)?
But what is actually happening is x in y, not x in dy.

>>16075614
if were thinking mathematically lets say x = x, the most basic equation. wherefore did we get =? the equation asserts itself as true regardless of the value of x due to =. so is it = = =? = =_? thus the fundamental self immolation of mathematics absent of a granted context, upon which there is no reliable basis. and if the basis for all answer is unreliable, again, what reliable answer can be given? all we have is language and it is incapable. the fact that you disagree with this reinforces the argument, by the way

>>16075614
>>16076406
why is inconsistency with reality a problem? wouldn't that be the only possible answer to any metaphysical question? there seems to be a lack of understanding of the word metaphysical. and paradox is predicated on nothing but logic, so i ask again, upon what is logic or language predicated?

>>16075614
>>16076406
>>16076423
the endpoint here is that all is possibility, uncertainty, unreliability in any metaphysical or philosophical sense, where as there may be definition in the holistic falsehood of practicality. therein it appears we may agree, but the only course of action one can reasonably make from this conclusion is to remove oneself from any metaphysical question, so you and i have failed there

>>16075304
Cool

>>16075301
I enjoyed reading this anon, really. I remember when I felt this way, very nostalgic. I'm too tired to longpost but maybe you'll find your answer in some sufficiently lonely sentiment like Nietzsche's idea of Eternal Recurrence as one example, but only one example. Kierkegaard's leap of faith is another example. Preferably design your own. Once you find a way to relate your peculiar kind of loneliness to history and the world, then at that point you'll find yourself reacting to things like life and death, wondering about them, they'll start making you giddy with joy at the possibilities, you will also notice that you can exert your thoughts a lot stronger. Only be careful not to get caught in the snare of the false dichotomy of determinism and free-will, I struggled a lot with that myself, although you may be smarter than me and have already overcome that hurdle. Sorry if I'm not being very articulate anon. You're in for some interesting experiences, no getting off Mr. Bones wild ride now.