/lit/ - Literature

it sells

>>16032863
>those latin and french parentheses
what on earth is he doing lel

>>16032863
>>16032880
Ikr, as if "attentio" is going to extrapolate or help anything at all.

>>16032863
But is he unoriginal?

>>16032863
What the fuck is he rambling about you can’t be this retarded

>>16032863
Imagine getting filtered by Kantbot

>>16032863
Everything he says in this, and proceeding if you want to read the rest of this short bit on his twitter, is nothing more than equivocal for a practical introverts therapy. It's no better than putting casual advice pretentiously, and everything he says here practically has no basing. All it shows is 1. That he has no understanding of social experience, and 2. A complete lack of understanding of psychology, how the mind works, how the mind may work, and for example things so basic in how the mind recognises things which is easily shown in neuroscience.

>>16032895
Lmao, he thinks common wisdom is worth writing down like this, and that is funny, but I doubt he found it funny and rather thought it was the voice of his unsung genius.

>>16032899
It’s not getting filtered. Fatborg is rehashing basic self help into pseudobabble

>>16032945
Please state the difference between him and Jordan Peterson

>>16032863
Kantbot?
This is your brain on Cioran.

>>16032863
/lit/ punches up at Kantbot to feel better about themselves

>>16032933
>neuroscience
Yikes.
Go back.

>>16032967
Fatborg needs to get a script and lose some weight. I recommend adderall

Other than the constant terms in parentheses, what's wrong with it?

>>16032989
I'm not a materialist bugman, retard, but I am saying that we can see some very basic patterns of how the brain recognises things in just the most basic neural sense, and how that is not some imaginative "constant flux which makes it impossible to look within" like Kantbot says.

Did you even read it?

>>16032863
Jesus, he really is living rent free with a lot of you guys.

>>16033002
Pretty much everything, it would be better if he wrote it and then accepted it as a practical self-help for introverts in social situations, and that every bit about psychology in it is as unfounded as claiming that introverted self-help to be a universal psychological character of mans being.

>>16033011
>"le rent free" bait

>>16032933
>which is easily shown in neuroscience
You have to go back.

>>16033031
See>>16033006

>>16032863
Source link for that pic? Does he publish his shit somewhere else that isn't paywalled?

>>16033023
As soon kantbot is mentioned people rush in to give their takes.

>>16033039
https://twitter.com/KBULTRA0/status/1289395804516552704/photo/4

And I think so yeah, other than twitter.

>>16033055
Because it's fun.

>>16032933
>muh neuroscience

R E D D I T
E
D
D
I
T

>>16033011
Ok kantbot

>>16032989
>>16033031
>>16033064
Samefag.

>>16033056
>as evidenced by an adolescent girl who is approached or a peasant unfamiliar with urban manners
wew lad

>>16032863

Jesus christ this is your hero /lit/?

>>16032863
Go back to twitter with your bullshit fucking faggot.

>>16032863
>>16032880
He's using Kant's writing style. Check his 1790s Anthropology, he literally writes like that. I think it is very effective when you're an actual erudite (which is not the case for poor ol' Kantbot)
Pic related

>>16033163
Cringe.

>>16033163
lmao that's spot on

The observer effect is a mean mistress and has major implications, /lit/ is low IQ

>>16033163
Lmao, he's writing like Kant who has a lot of things to say but in Kantbot's case he just doesn't have much to say and comes across pseudy and midwitty.

>>16033197
I've just realized OP rused us. That passage is actually from the 1790s Anthropology, that's why it immediatly reminded me of it. Basically, everyone in this thread is actually mocking the real Immanuel Kant.

>>16033197
>Lmao, he's writing like Kant who has a lot of things to say but in Kantbot's case he just doesn't have much to say and comes across pseudy and midwitty.
He's not, he's writing like whoever translates Kant's work to English lmao.

>>16033210
10/10 /lit/ confirmed for midwit psueds I bet OP is Kantbot laughing his ass off

>>16033210
Kant is still an autistic nerd.

>>16033225
No he isn't

>>16033210
Well that's just a lie, I just checked the twitter and it's kantbot.

>>16033235
Nope, it's from the Anthropology, check on Google Books. He just reppsted it on his twitter page

>>16033244
Or here at page 15
https://it.scribd.com/document/229380798/Immanuel-Kant-Anthropology-From-a-Pragmatic-Point-of-View-1996

>>16033244
Very vague anon, you're gonna have to provide a link.

>>16033210
KEKEKEKEKEK

>>16033255
it just gets more autistic, that bit about the girl and the peasant being wholly without artifice and inspiring 'a cheerful laugh in those who are already practiced and wise in this art'

>>16032863
>>16033163
>>16033197
>>16033210
>>16033244
>>16033255
Okay, okay, I think I can save this. We're actually midwits, haha right, for considering Immanual Kant's work dumb and "pseudobabble", it's just the meaning of a work is defined by its system and who is writing it, if this were written by Kantbot and in modern times as a reaction to psychology, and if he were imitating Kant, we could easily call it pretentious, which Kantbot for most of those things did post it for, so we're not entirely wrong for critiquing bot for this.

>>16033257
Here >>16033255

>>16033281
Yeah, I actually agree. Ironically, Kant and Kantbot would agree too

>>16033281
Meant to say
>We're *NOT* actually midwits

>>16033281
tbqh i still think it's dumb and Kant is autistic. The use of Latin is much more understandable in the 18th century though.

>>16033277
It makes sense in Kant's historical context. In the current age we are not as encumbered by social/polite formalities as they were.

>>16033210
>Basically, everyone in this thread is actually mocking the real Immanuel Kant.
k.. kant?

>>16033298
It makes sense if you know nothing about teenage girls or peasants, which Kant probably didn't I guess

>>16033340
He must have met some, he didn't live in a big city.

Jesus Christ, anons, how fucking embarrassing

This is the best thread on /lit/ not a single one of your opinions holds value

I am laughing so hard

>>16032880
>>16032884
>>16032897
>>16032933
>>16032936
>>16032945
>>16033016
>>16033089
>>16033197
Never return to /lit/ you are exiled for eternity

I don't care where you go but you can't stay here

>>16033413
See>>16033281

I am too intellectual to be weighed down by a trick.

>>16033424
Cope. If you had applied the categorical imperative while reading the OP post you would have had a proper moral outlook on the words which would have prevented your deception. You failed.

>>16033439
Not at all, if Kant bot had written this in the 21st century of the meme internet it would have been worthless, it was reviewed in the consideration of Kantbot and what he bases his thoughts and writings on, not of Kant the greatest modern philosopher.

>>16033439
The CI has nothing to do with what you're talking about. It certainly does not prescribe us a duty to judge sentences out of context.

>>16033451
The CI would have enabled you to understand the true context, as it was your immoral position that landed you in the context of Kantbot being the author.
>>16033445
The words contain an objective code that is independent of context, you're just dull to the code and thus context overlaps for you. This is normal for humans, we aren't good at this. Nothing is, yet. NLP software is coming though.

Holy shit!
OH NO NO NO NO
This is embarrassing /lit/ hahahahhaaha
Put me in the screencap, we must make fun of this moment for the rest of /lit/'s existence.

>>16033499
>objective code
Lmao what a LARP, do you know what language is? Do you know what history is?

Is this /lit/'s lowest moment?

>>16033499
>as it was your immoral position that landed you in the context of Kantbot being the author.
Nope, it was OP's comment that landed me there. I assumed it was truthful, and that that excerpt had really been written by Kantbot. It's not immoral for me to trust other people.

>>16033515
No, it's just part of /lit/ humour to joke about being a pseud and midwit board, but that meme was somewhat forgotten a year ago.

>>16033509
Confirmed for no concept of NLP or linguistic determinism
>>16033521
It is when your immoral heart follows the path without a single bump in the road

>Most ebin falseflag of all time over a literally who e celeb
Wow haha, very ebin. Include me in le lebbit screencap :DDDDD /lit/ btfo again lmao :DDD

>>16033524
I i i i i i was just pretending to be retarded!!!

>>16033521
You have saved the board anon, and by Kant's Categorical Imperative of all things. We are not a midwit board.

>>16033536
>the entire board is unable to recognize Kant's writing style which is known to be distinct

Wikipedia skimmers every last one of you

>>16033528
>Confirmed for no concept of NLP or linguistic determinism
These things do not go against what I said, that Kantbot's definitions and system would equate a different meaning altogether, and an obvious judgement of pretentiousness would come about.

>>16033538
Hey pal I'm still on the Greeks.

I'll wait until this thread get archived before making the screencap.

>>16033163

He's not writing like Kant, he's quoting Kant. OP's screenshot is literally from one of Kant's books. Kantbot quoted it on some troll tweet along with four other pages from the book. Just Google the first few words of the screenshot, Christ. This thread is cancer, just make fat jokes and quit being pseuds.

https://books.google.com/books?id=eKKcUTnWWo0C&pg=RA1-PA131&lpg=RA1-PA131&dq=%22paying+attention+(attentio)+to+oneself%22&source=bl&ots=OVvOWLWox4&sig=ACfU3U0A3lxjCF8_a4qewd2mSrBt1oA-Dw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjfuZyQrf7qAhVQJKwKHQF3BWEQ6AEwAHoECAQQAQ#v=onepage&q&f=false

>>16032967
Peterson is older, thinner, has kids and experience as a professor. He's not much smarter but at least he can regurgitate good shit from others occasionally.

>>16033556
Well alright bro, see your words are unique to you. There is an underlying code you just haven't the capacity to notice it accurately, given a limited understanding of the patterns of either individual. The pattern is there, and it is distinct. In the future we will quantify things like this immediately.

>>16033572
>he believes Peterson's fake family schtick

It's all part of the business model

>>16032863
>that's retarded
"ermmm don't you know that Kant wrote that! checkmate pseud

It's still retarded

>>16033576
What a LARP nerd, yes there is a pattern but you're looking at it in a cringe mathematical outlook. The thing is, I of course haven't read Kant. I am excused by that and the Op deceiving me. It is perfectly explainable if Kantbot had written that.

>>16033580
Weve got a doubledowner!!!

Lets hear it. Lets hear how Immanuel Kant is retarded.

>>16033587
Bro you really miss the point. Eventually there will no longer be these kinds of linguistic confusions because of computing advancements. The categorical imperative will be applied in ways Kant could only dream of. It's not a larp.

>>16033596
Kant would never dream of this dehumanising autism.

>>16033596
>Eventually there will no longer be these kinds of linguistic confusions because of computing advancements.
Yikes

>>16033627
>>16033603
In humans the categorical imperative cannot truly be achieved with total accuracy, computers are the true way to apply his ethics. Also, Kant literally had little machines in his pockets. Fucker was steampunk'd out.

>>16033591
if he wrote that he's retared and autistic

Kantbot is right. The level of discourse on the internet is at an all time low.

>>16033655
Idk the roodypoo and candyass shit was pretty low

Truly /lit/ has fallen to a new low. This is even worse than the tampon-boy episode.

>>16032863
>why is a midwit a midwit
are you a tard?

>there were probably anons that felt so embarrassed that they closed the tab and left 4chan for today
Oh no no no

>>16032863
My word of choice would be pseud.

>>16033217
Wrong. Kant was a retard. This is the greatest proof.

>>16034053
Another one fell for it boys.

Kant, Hegel, and honestly all continentals are midwit pseuds and/or obscurantist charlatans

https://youtu.be/fgerL96Df_Y
Kant eternally BTFO.

>>16034091
ur so smart wyteboi

>>16034094
Lmao goblina Kant.ew

Kill yourselves for not being capable of recognising legit philosophy writing

https://youtu.be/cTP01Wbsh0E
Kant is the equivalent of a 5 year old kenyan.

>>16034156
How is it legit anon?

>>16034169
You need higher IQ to get it

>>16034156
If it's legitimate, shouldn't it be easy to recognize it as such? Or at least for a layman to recognize that it isn't illegitimate? Kant is trash.

>>16034180
>If it's legitimate, shouldn't it be easy to recognize it as such?
Yes, it is for those who are not subhuman retards like people ITT

>>16034094
Is this what happens when you get bullied by the noumena?
https://youtu.be/SrsmQpMX5bg

>>16034176
Sure thing anon.

>>16034190
Cope brainlet

>>16033413
God you’re such a queer tagging me. You’re such a queer mass responding. You’re such a queer trying to corral /lit/ like its playtime and you’re the biggest child in the ballpit. Speaking on behalf of literature, message boards, the kids in your early milieu who detested you: queer, go to the 90s and get aids

>>16034167
I wonder why he would want to fail the mirror test.

>>16033163
In this case attentio is the same as Heidegger's 'concern'. Ofc for Heidegger knowledge is not taken in to the mind, but Dasien's forgetting of everything outside of its concern. But in any case, Kant is clearly using it here in his exposition of philosophy of mind and intentionality.

Kantbot is a pseud because he is using technical terminology inappropriately. That is pseudo-analysis.

>>16034185
Indeed the sane and healthy people in this thread have identified Kant's writings as pure pseudery, the sort to which losers with delusions of grandeur like Kantbot naturally flock to.

>>16034235
Low IQ

>>16034257
projecting ESL

>>16034257
>look I posted it again

Let's get that screencap

>>16034277
>>16034282
Coping brainlets

>>16034295
seething phoneposter

>>16032863
Cool excerpt from literature. Where can I read more?

>>16034294
you do it. make sure to capture the double down-ing artistically

>>16033281
If Kantbot wrote this In the present reacting to psychology, it would be stupid. Kant writing it wasn’t stupid in his time. TL;DR’d

>>16033528
Words are symbols, retard
Read Wittgenstein

>>16034344
Nonetheless, if you can't tell good philosophy writing you're a pseud

>>16034369
If you think philosophy is worthwhile, you're a pseud.

>>16034385
You got filtered by philosophy so you're automatically a midwit

>>16034391
Continental philosophy is the ultimate expression of midwittery.

>>16034369
How does that refute what I said?

>>16033210
Is this the work where Kant says black people and women aren't human, and so not moral agents? It's not like everything Kant wrote is automatically genius or worthwhile.

>>16034457
? If he said that he's beyond based. What the fuck are you talking about retard?

>>16034327
I suck at images.

>>16034470
>If he agrees with me he's based!
cringe

>>16034482
>if he disagrees with me he's not worthwhile
Kys hole

>>16034496
>if someone disagrees with my idiotic reasoning, they must be naturally be diametrically opposed to the conclusion AND of the other gender
Of course you're a Kantian.

>>16034521
Go back

>>16033011
Ok fats.

>>16034470
It's idiotic because it reveals that his entire ethical system is universal only to the entities he determined worthwhile. In other words, ethics is limited to 'rational agents' who are determined socially. It's not strictly speaking universal, but universal for social groups we already accept as worth moral consideration.

The point is Kant, like many philosophers wrote genius and wrote drivel. His anthropology is a known stain on his philosophy...

>>16034545
His ethical system doesn't extend to women and blacks the same way it doesn't extend to animals. Now fuck off back to r*ddit

>>16034545
>social groups
Women and blacks are biological groups you retarded piece of shit

>>16034529
seething phoneposter

>>16034573
seething phoneposter

>>16034580
seething phoneposter

>>16034594
seething phoneposter

>>16034594
>>16034606
>>16034612

>>16034606
seething phoneposter

>>16034612
seething phoneposter

threads like these should be proof to all the regards that they have been horribly instrumentalized in internet factionwars

but I know that's not the case regards will keep posting stale memes until their brains shrivel

>>16034545
>>16034521
Why are you pretending you're not a woman? It's obvious from your writing and "logic"

>>16034648
Incel spotted.

>>16034645
>regards

>>16034649

>>16034654
Is this what you think women look like?

>>16034650
stop exposing me as a phoneposter thanks

>>16034658
>r/eddit humor

>>16034667
t. soijak poster

possibly the most embarrassing thread on /lit/
just end the board now, it's over, we will never recover

>>16034648
HOLY cringe

Great thread.

https://youtu.be/QFWZNEzeeEo
So THIS is the power of Kant.

>>16034696
Why do you keep posting this?

True midwittery suddenly believing this writing is profound simply because it's Kant. It's badly written, and Kant's Anthropology is notoriously poor 'philosophy'.

>>16032863
Sounds as if he never talks to people. Too much noticing yourself leads to awkwardness but not noticing yourself at all leads to you just riding the social wave. It can be good it can be bad, but you have no control over it. As with everything, practice lets you get better at it.

>>16034853
embarrassing

>>16034885
No. It's good what he says: a definite man will not care what he is seen as, and therefore be at ease. But if a man wishes to get some kind of output out of the social meeting, wouldn't he need to steer the conversation to a beneficial place? For that you need a bit of self awareness.

>>16034927
read the thread before answering me

>>16034954
He's right though.
>Kant had eccentric beliefs about health and wellness. Kant wrapped himself up very tightly in his bed, and his manservant Lampe had an almost maternal relationship with him. Kant had pseudoscientific beliefs about pollutants in the air during cold weather (it would be anachronistic to refer to ‘germs’ for his understanding), and the importance of sleeping properly. Kant believed in the importance of regular and consistent sleeping patterns for reasons us moderns would perhaps disagree with. Kant believed that sleep brought us closer to death, insofar as having more time in bed led to having less time alive. This might seem to sound correct by normal sensibility, but Kant had very little scientific backing for this belief; Kant thought that having less sleep would mean one would have a longer life, while having too much sleep would give us a shorter life. The grounds of his promotion of ‘equilibrium’ are alien to today’s notion of good sleep health. Kant also believed strongly in breathing through one’s nose instead of one’s mouth, and constantly covered his mouth when out in bitter cold.

>>16034954
?The philosopher got up every morning at five o’clock, ate lunch and went out only at five o’clock in the evening for the walk, so punctual that people regulated their watches. Dined in the company, but walking by himself – and here begins the hypochondriacal neurosis. He did it not to meditate in peace, but to breathe through the nose, that could not have done in company. He opened his mouth only to recommended to his friends constantly: “Balance and persevering in this exercise ensures a long immunity from colds, aches, catarrh and lung disorders.” He had a system of rods to hold up stockings without using – like his contemporaries – the garters that were blocking circulation. At ten o’clock he went to sleep in a room completely dark: a moonbeam could disturb the rest.

>>16034987
>At ten o'clock in the night he would go to bed; that means exactly ten, not one minute
before, not one minute after. His servant... he had only one servant. Who else would
agree to live with such a person? — only a servant. His family deserted him; he was so
mechanical, such a drain, such a drag on the whole family. The servant used to simply
tell him the time -- not "Now go to sleep"; he would simply come and declare, "It is ten
o'clock," and that was it. He would jump immediately into his bed. Even if there were
visitors, he would not even say goodbye to them. He would go into the bed, under his
blanket, and the servant would declare to the visitors, "Now you go please. He has gone
to sleep."

>At exactly five o'clock he had to be dragged out of the bed. Sometimes it was too cold
and he was too tired, but the routine had to be followed — even if he was ill, the routine
had to be followed. The servant was told that maybe sometimes he will feel weak,
tempted to sleep a little longer, but he is not to listen. He has to be dragged out, even
against his will. Even if he is saying, "No, I want to sleep," the servant has to pull him
out. It sometimes used to be a fight, a quarrel. The servant had to beat him to bring him
out of the bed — that was his duty.

>>16034978
>>16034987
>>16035005
Autism really is a superpower. Not too different from the average German though.

>>16033210
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

these quotes about Kant validate his texts more than anything else

>>16035108
lol wot

>>16035112
https://www.appliedbehavioranalysisprograms.com/historys-30-most-inspiring-people-on-the-autism-spectrum/
"autism" is an egalitarian ruse to deny the existence of divine enlightened individuals.

>>16033210
>God, whoever wrote this garbage is a ridiculous pseudointellectual
>"Actually it's the real Immanuel Kant"
>Okay, so I was right.

>>16035112
don't know how you cannot think this ultimate midwit cope

>>16034978
>>16034987
>>16035005

>>16034978
>>16034987
>>16035005
Simply based.

BAP is right

>>16035445
That Kant and other autistic savants with mind boggling intellectual influence will always be men superior to male models and jocks?

yes yes he is

>>16035468
Kant is just cringe Schopenhauer

>>16032880
stfu anglo

>>16035482
don't know what mind games you have been exposed to

>>16032989
>>16033031
>>16033064
Low IQ coping idealists.
If you lost your hippocampus you'd never be able to form new memories again.
There is nothing in the mind that isn't reducible to materialistic impulses.
Modern neuroscience is weak as shit but ultimately the philosophical foundation is correct.
Coping, seething, and shitting your diapers while quoting pseudo-philosophical texts don't change this reality.

>>16034978
>Kant also believed strongly in breathing through one’s nose instead of one’s mouth, and constantly covered his mouth when out in bitter cold.
Confirmed Kant epicly recked the cringe mouthbreathers.

>>16034211

>>16035505
Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung
try reading a book kantlet

>>16035553
go back.

>>16035553
I was the original anon, and though while you contain the truth that explicates my original statement into truth, you're wrong in suggesting everything in mans life can be reduced to the empirical. All of life is not empirical, the true nature of mans being is not mere quantity.

>>16035598
I've never been.
Stop coping.

Kantbot is just Jordan Peterson for people who use phrases like "irony poisoned" and "hellworld"

>>16035590
Schopenhauer the vulgarizer the angliziced "common sense" loser

no thanks

>>16035618
ironic post

... Not like this litbros

How do these Twitter geniuses like kantbot, logo, and guppy keep humiliating us???

>>16035638
Get a job guppy

OH NO NO NO NO NO

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>16034354

EXACTLY

READ A CRYPTOGRAPHY BOOK

>>16035836
if encrypted information is indistinguishable from randomness, how do we know that naturally occurring randomness isn't itself encrypted?

>>16035856
It is encrypted from the human point of view, we live in a decoherent dimension. Also, eventually it will be distinguishable. The quantum level of things has a totally different level of coherence.