[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

View post   
File: 99 KB, 679x1024, first-edition-1954-answer-job-g-jung_1_c72903f18b14cedc19d71ef7927a8860.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16027802 No.16027802 [Reply] [Original]

>Job had the moral upper-hand
Was Jung incredible based or incredibly contrarian?

>> No.16027824

I never read this. Is he suggesting Job had the moral upper-hand relatively to God or the people who urged him to renounce God?

>> No.16027831

>>16027802
God can do whatever he wants and be moral

>> No.16027884

>>16027802
The chad Scott doesn't tolerate nonsense
https://slatestarcodex.com/2015/03/15/answer-to-job/

>> No.16028704

>>16027831
Ngl religious freaks like you are scary.

>> No.16028744

>>16028704
God has no reason to do something that isn’t ultimately for his benefit.

>> No.16028757

>>16027802
Jung was based

>> No.16028767

>>16028757
Jung was a pseud.

>> No.16028777

>>16028767
t. pseud

>> No.16029061

>>16028744
God is a narcissistic psychopath

>> No.16029081

>>16029061
the same reasoning applies to you

>> No.16029101
File: 315 KB, 960x960, EWFiDNKU8AcqgQq.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16029101

>>16027802
He had a mind of an Aryan.

Only a Semite would SUBMIT to god.
An Aryan follows the path of a Hero, he questions even the gods, he gives them the middle finger when needed.

>> No.16029325

>>16027824
>Is he suggesting Job had the moral upper-hand relatively to God
yes, though the subtheses go far deeper than that

>> No.16029363

>>16028744
Jung is questioning this. God is after all as a concept in constant discussion about its motivations and actions with His subjects.

>> No.16029379

>>16029101
Yet the Semite Erich Neumann loved this work.

>> No.16029380

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0aqlS9SOkjs