/lit/ - Literature

>>16010513
It's a duck because rabbit ears aren't like that. Checkmate analytics.

>>16010513
it's a tranny rabbit

>>16010562
Unfortunately this is true.

>>16010513
it's a drawing

>>16010513
Platonism BTFO.

Here's one for you. Anyone else have a book of these illusions/op-art when they were children?

>>16010562
A duck's beak is also not like that

>>16010886
At least post a real one instead of that fake shit.

>>16010886
how is this an illusion? these are obviously different objects

>>16010896
Yeah, it's more like a seagull

>>16010905
jesus christ

>>16010513
Obviously a rabbit with badly drawn ears.

>>16010847
Kek was just thinking of this.

>>16010513
I see a nose

>>16010905
I don't get it what's the problem?

>>16010963
Try to move your head backward and forward fast

>>16010926
Friendly reminder that qualia don't exist. Experiential states are comparative and context dependent. Redness isn't real.

>>16010967
Well now you just made me look like a fucking idiot, what's your problem? Just fucken tell me faggot.

>>16010971
>he hasn't experienced the depths of emotional qualia without any context of meaning
You haven't experienced life yet, fren. Well you have but it's nonetheless interesting to experience such times of emotion.

>>16010971
It just means there is no one-to-one correspondence between qualia and external stimuli. You can still experience "redness", even when you're not looking at a red thing.

>>16010991
He's not >>16010905

The problem is the lines in the image you posted aren't actually the same size. Your image is a meme version set out like the illusion, but not actually employing it.

>>16010963

>>16011063
Dang it, do you have the actual image?

>>16010513
is it a duckor a chiken, or is it a mix of the two a duchen

>>16011072
Explain it to me.

>>16011224
That's a good point.

>>16011245
Do you have mental impairments?

>>16011245
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Checker_shadow_illusion

>>16010513
That's obviously driftwood.

I failed.

reminder that if you haven't reported this thread you're part of the problem

>>16012082
Why

It's a nigger!

>>16012082
Read Wittgenstein faggot

Did anyone ever think that perhaps it was a caricature of a negro? It even has that weird occupital bun thing going on.

So what relation does this have with the rope and the snake in the Upanishads? How can one thing be two things, how can enlightenment already be ignorance?

There's a great truth here that's just on the tip of my tongue.

>>16011313
Oh, that's it? Context determines how we interpret what we see, who could have guessed

>>16010513