[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature


View post   

File: 9 KB, 300x168, elevator music.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15972452 No.15972452 [Reply] [Original]

I have emerged and solved all the problem of philosophy, but keep all the smart posts to myself, and for now I will graciously bestow the right answers to x to y classical to literature.

Beethoven:Shakespeare the tragedian
Bach:Tolstoy
Mozart:Shakespeare the everyman
Bach:Dante with expansive annotations
Liszt:Goethe
Debussy:Flaubert

I will make additions or edits based on well reasoned anons.

>> No.15972555

>>15972452
Wagner?
Poulenc?

>> No.15972577

>>15972555
Nietzsche and that faggot who I'm not gonna say but you know him and his 7 part work.

>> No.15972586

>>15972452
>Beethoven:Shakespeare the tragedian
I will choose to ignore their defining differences just to allow this easiness, and the eminent truth in it.

>Bach:Tolstoy
Utterly false and a basic impression.

>Mozart:Shakespeare the everyman
No way, you'd need a more youthful poet. No Dante or Shakespeare here, more Schiller or Goethe like.

>Bach:Dante with expansive annotations
I can at least see this, and it holds up in their overt Christian symbolism.

>Liszt:Goethe
Maybe in heard words and seen images, but in any real way not at all.

>Debussy:Flaubert
I think this is somewhat unfair to Flaubert.

Where is Wagner, as the other anon said? i'll make one contribution:

Meyerbeer: Bronze Age Pervert

>> No.15972595

>>15972452
>>15972586
I should also say Martin Luther was the choice for another anon on Bach, and I prefer it.

>> No.15972640

>>15972586
>I think this is somewhat unfair to Flaubert.
How come?

>> No.15972706

>>15972586
>>Debussy:Flaubert
>I think this is somewhat unfair to Flaubert.

I mean it's all patchy, but this works at least for Anglo perceptions for Flaubert.

>> No.15972716
File: 131 KB, 360x450, pink wojak.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15972716

>>15972640
>>15972706
Well, I HATE Debussy.

>> No.15972743

>>15972716
That's too bad. He's not really a top-tier composer, but I enjoy his works from time to time. The same applies to Flaubert as a writer.

>> No.15972792

>>15972452
Bach is greatest composer of all time.
So Bach is Shakespeare.

>> No.15972818

Wagner = Nietzsche

>> No.15972841

>>15972818
You forgot the :^)

>> No.15972870

>>15972818
I said that here
>>15972577
Nietzsche wrote literature.

>> No.15972874 [DELETED] 

Chopin:Kierkegaard

>> No.15972880

>>15972874
lol, this actually fits pretty well.

>> No.15972883

Stravinsky:Heidegger

>> No.15972887

Chopin:Kierkegaard

>> No.15972890

who is the king crimson of literature? my answer is ernest hemingway

>> No.15972894

>>15972880
Why'd you delete your post? Chopin:Kierkegaard is a funny comparison.

>> No.15972904

>>15972887
>>15972894
Christ, anime tier afterimage clone teleports behind you shit going on here

>> No.15972907

>>15972894
was rethinking it, but i came back to it

>> No.15972915

>>15972907
im really fond of chopin but not that familliar with Kierkegaard

>> No.15972932

brahms = eichendorff

>> No.15972985

>>15972452
Debussy should be Mallarme

>> No.15973002
File: 6 KB, 268x284, 1563410197774.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15973002

>>15972586
MEYERBEER BTFO
LMAO

>> No.15973025

The closest writer to Bach is God himself

>> No.15973072

>>15972586
>No way, you'd need a more youthful poet. No Dante or Shakespeare here, more Schiller or Goethe like.
I think Mozart and Pushkin would be a good match. If not, then maybe Pushkin and Mendelsohn.

>> No.15973091
File: 195 KB, 745x373, Bach.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15973091

>>15973025
This.

>> No.15973097

>>15972870
I think he was saying that it's utterly stupid to make Nietzsche Wagner's literary equivalent.

>> No.15973169 [DELETED] 

Paganini:Machiavelli

>> No.15973342

Mozart - Leibniz