/lit/ - Literature

Weininger, Sex and Character
Schopenhauer, On Women
Vilar, The Manipulated Man
Paglia, Sexual Personae
Baumeister, Is There Anything Good About Men?
Wollstonecraft, Vindication of the Rights of Women
Warren Farrell, The Myth of Male Power

Reminder to respond to any roasties invoking holes.jpg by referring them to holes.jpg. The only way they will learn to say something other than 'u cant have holes if u say that' is to refuse to engage with them. Help them help themselves.

>>15935187
>>15935199

Post your chin

"Taught from their infancy that beauty is woman's sceptre, the mind shapes itself to the body, and, roaming round its gilt cage, only seeks to adore its prison. Men have various employments and pursuits which engage their attention, and give a character to the opening mind; but women, confined to one, and having their thoughts constantly directed to the most insignificant part of themselves, seldom extend their views beyond the triumph of the hour."

"The whole female sex are, till their character is formed, in the same condition as the rich: for they are born .. with certain sexual privileges, and whilst they are gratuitously granted them, few will ever think of works of supererogation, to obtain the esteem of a small number of superiour people."
>Mary Wollstonecraft

"So, then, wherever wasteful expenditure and the show of abstention from effort is normally, or on an average, carried to the extent of showing obvious discomfort or voluntarily induced physical disability. There the immediate inference is that the individual in question does not perform this wasteful expenditure and undergo this disability for her own personal gain in pecuniary repute, but in behalf of some one else to whom she stands in a relation of economic dependence; a relation which in the last analysis must, in economic theory, reduce itself to a relation of servitude.

To apply this generalization to women's dress, and put the matter in concrete terms: the high heel, the skirt, the impracticable bonnet, the corset, and the general disregard of the wearer's comfort which is an obvious feature of all civilized women's apparel, are so many items of evidence to the effect that in the modern civilized scheme of life the woman is still, in theory, the economic dependent of the man—that, perhaps in a highly idealized sense, she still is the man's chattel. The homely reason for all this conspicuous leisure and attire on the part of women lies in the fact that they are servants to whom, in the differentiation of economic functions, has been delegated the office of putting in evidence their master's ability to pay. There is a marked similarity in these respects between the apparel of women and that of domestic servants, especially liveried servants. In both there is a very elaborate show of unnecessary expensiveness, and in both cases there is also a notable disregard of the physical comfort of the wearer. But the attire of the lady goes farther in its elaborate insistence on the idleness, if not on the physical infirmity of the wearer, than does that of the domestic. And this is as it should be; for in theory, according to the ideal scheme of the pecuniary culture, the lady of the house is the chief menial of the household."
>Thorstein Veblen

>>15935205
Hole.

>>15935187
have sex

>>15935227
No thanks I don't want to have sex with you.

>>15935187
have sex

How can you hate women, they are so cute and probably smell nice too

>>15935308
I don't think that girl would give you the time of the day, buddy.

>>15935356
It's not hers to give. Buddy.

Is homosexuality the optimal choice then?

>>15935443
No, just raising women not to be braindead whores on antidepressants would do it.

>>15935187
>Weininger
Imagine listening to a Jew telling you not to get married and have children. The gullible White man is duped yet again, yikes!

I love women. Are there any good novels written about/by women?

>>15935308
that's a lie anon women never smelled nice.

>>15935443
No, but it's an acceptable one.

Sincere question, why would anyone hate women?
Isn't it better to avoid the general bitterness that results by embracing an emotion such as hatred and instead choose to live apathetically towards them?

>>15935308
>fake eyebrows
This disappoints me greatly every time I see it. It's almost as bad as a tattoo or piercing.

>>15935457
Stupid /pol/tard, Western women in 2020 are by and large trash tier, your best bet is ignoring spooks like (((future of white race))) or (((nation))) altogether
>>15935470
No, women can't write

>>15935489
Because they are trying to take away your rights and invading your spaces

>>15935499
But that would be jews though, and last I checked it is men enabling these women. Women just take because it is in human nature to take. In this case it is the simping males or numales whatever you want to call them that bend the knee to them for some unknowable reason.
Wouldn't your hatred instead be better redirected at jews and female-enabling men?

>>15935308
You can tell by the eyes that she isn't thinking. My dog staring at me has more profundity in its animal toughts than her.

>>15935491
t. either a homosexual or an ethnic.

Sorry Panjir, me not marrying a White girl will not make them want to send you bob any more than they already do.

>>15935528
Sounds like you want to date a man, Anon. Not sure why gay guys love talking to straight guys about how inferior women are.

>>15935187
Rent-free

>>15935565
I wouldn't need to talk about the inferiority of women so often if it were universally recognized. But this age of general idiocy forces me to do so.

Feminism would die in one day if someone did a research on why women choose their sexual partners.
>inb4 incel fantasies about chads with giant jaws.
No. THAT would be even more rational than the actual truth. They act like they love sex and they love muscled tall imponent attractive chads so men never discover the truth. Because if men were aware about the female criteria at choosing partners, we would go back to Roman times concerning women's liberties and value in society. They would be furniture.

>>15935227
>>15935244
No.

>>15935741

What are you suggesting is the criteria?

>>15935741
Women choosing weak men in a very calculated manner because they are easy to control?

Have you heard of Alex, aka "Hell By The Dashboard Light"?

>>15935796
Environment and position. They fall in love with some retard just because 1) he's in her circles 2) he has a good position in them. It could be whoever. Not by physical shape, not by being atractive, not by intelligence, not by personality, not even by status or money, only because the retard was there just in the perfect time and place.

>>15935187
He literally only BTFO'd himself literally, he was literally an attention whore and a self-hating homosexual and self-hating jew

>>15935308
This, its only faggots like the one in the OP that hate them, freaks of nature

>>15935489
Only subversive jews and faggots that are jealous and are projecting do